scholarly journals Pulse Rate Variability Analysis Using Remote Photoplethysmography Signals

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 6241
Author(s):  
Su-Gyeong Yu ◽  
So-Eui Kim ◽  
Na Hye Kim ◽  
Kun Ha Suh ◽  
Eui Chul Lee
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Pulse Rate ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Health Status Indicators ◽  
Pulse Rate Variability ◽  
System A ◽  
Remote Photoplethysmography ◽  
Volume Pulse ◽  
Blood Volume Pulse

Pulse rate variability (PRV) refers to the change in the interval between pulses in the blood volume pulse (BVP) signal acquired using photoplethysmography (PPG). PRV is an indicator of the health status of an individual’s autonomic nervous system. A representative method for measuring BVP is contact PPG (CPPG). CPPG may cause discomfort to a user, because the sensor is attached to the finger for measurements. In contrast, noncontact remote PPG (RPPG) extracts BVP signals from face data using a camera without the need for a sensor. However, because the existing RPPG is a technology that extracts a single pulse rate rather than a continuous BVP signal, it is difficult to extract additional health status indicators. Therefore, in this study, PRV analysis is performed using lab-based RPPG technology that can yield continuous BVP signals. In addition, we intended to confirm that the analysis of PRV via RPPG can be performed with the same quality as analysis via CPPG. The experimental results confirmed that the temporal and frequency parameters of PRV extracted from RPPG and CPPG were similar. In terms of correlation, the PRVs of RPPG and CPPG yielded correlation coefficients between 0.98 and 1.0.

scholarly journals A wavelet-based decomposition method for a robust extraction of pulse rate from video recordings

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e5859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miha Finžgar ◽  
Primož Podržaj
Keyword(s):  
Wavelet Transform ◽  
Pulse Rate ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Pulse Signal ◽  
Video Signals ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
Volume Pulse ◽  
Blood Volume Pulse

Background Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) is a promising optical method for non-contact assessment of pulse rate (PR) from video recordings. In order to implement the method in real-time applications, it is necessary for the rPPG algorithms to be capable of eliminating as many distortions from the pulse signal as possible. Methods In order to increase the degrees-of-freedom of the distortion elimination, the dimensionality of the RGB video signals is increased by the wavelet transform decomposition using the generalized Morse wavelet. The proposed Continuous-Wavelet-Transform-based Sub-Band rPPG method (SB-CWT) is evaluated on the 101 publicly available RGB facial video recordings and corresponding reference blood volume pulse (BVP) signals taken from the MMSE-HR database. The performance of the SB-CWT is compared with the performance of the state-of-the-art Sub-band rPPG (SB). Results Median signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the proposed SB-CWT ranges from 6.63 to 10.39 dB and for the SB from 4.23 to 6.24 dB. The agreement between the estimated PRs from rPPG pulse signals and the reference signals in terms of the coefficients of determination ranges from 0.81 to 0.91 for SB-CWT and from 0.41 to 0.47 for SB. All the correlation coefficients are statistically significant (p < 0.001). The Bland–Altman plots show that mean difference range from 5.37 to 1.82 BPM for SB-CWT and from 22.18 to 18.80 BPM for SB. Discussion The results show that the proposed SB-CWT outperforms SB in terms of SNR and the agreement between the estimated PRs from RGB video signals and PRs from the reference BVP signals.

scholarly journals Evaluation of biases in remote photoplethysmography methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ananyananda Dasari ◽  
Sakthi Kumar Arul Prakash ◽  
László A. Jeni ◽  
Conrad S. Tucker
Keyword(s):  
Pulse Rate ◽  
Environmental Conditions ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Wearable Sensors ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Video Data ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Rate Measurement ◽  
Pulse Rate Variability ◽  
Remote Photoplethysmography

AbstractThis work investigates the estimation biases of remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) methods for pulse rate measurement across diverse demographics. Advances in photoplethysmography (PPG) and rPPG methods have enabled the development of contact and noncontact approaches for continuous monitoring and collection of patient health data. The contagious nature of viruses such as COVID-19 warrants noncontact methods for physiological signal estimation. However, these approaches are subject to estimation biases due to variations in environmental conditions and subject demographics. The performance of contact-based wearable sensors has been evaluated, using off-the-shelf devices across demographics. However, the measurement uncertainty of rPPG methods that estimate pulse rate has not been sufficiently tested across diverse demographic populations or environments. Quantifying the efficacy of rPPG methods in real-world conditions is critical in determining their potential viability as health monitoring solutions. Currently, publicly available face datasets accompanied by physiological measurements are typically captured in controlled laboratory settings, lacking diversity in subject skin tones, age, and cultural artifacts (e.g, bindi worn by Indian women). In this study, we collect pulse rate and facial video data from human subjects in India and Sierra Leone, in order to quantify the uncertainty in noncontact pulse rate estimation methods. The video data are used to estimate pulse rate using state-of-the-art rPPG camera-based methods, and compared against ground truth measurements captured using an FDA-approved contact-based pulse rate measurement device. Our study reveals that rPPG methods exhibit similar biases when compared with a contact-based device across demographic groups and environmental conditions. The mean difference between pulse rates measured by rPPG methods and the ground truth is found to be ~2% (1 beats per minute (b.p.m.)), signifying agreement of rPPG methods with the ground truth. We also find that rPPG methods show pulse rate variability of ~15% (11 b.p.m.), as compared to the ground truth. We investigate factors impacting rPPG methods and discuss solutions aimed at mitigating variance.

scholarly journals Feasibility of assessing ultra-short-term pulse rate variability from video recordings

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e8342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miha Finžgar ◽  
Primož Podržaj
Keyword(s):  
Pulse Rate ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Pulse Rate Variability ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
Remote Photoplethysmography ◽  
Small Effect Size

Objectives Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) is a promising non-contact measurement technique for assessing numerous physiological parameters: pulse rate, pulse rate variability (PRV), respiratory rate, pulse wave velocity, blood saturation, blood pressure, etc. To justify its use in ultra-short-term (UST) PRV analysis, which is of great benefit for several healthcare applications, the agreement between rPPG- and PPG-derived UST-PRV metrics was studied. Approach Three time-domain metrics—standard deviation of normal-to-normal (NN) intervals (SDNN), root mean square of successive NN interval differences (RMSSD), and the percentage of adjacent NN intervals that differ from each other by more than 50 ms (pNN50)—were extracted from 56 video recordings in a publicly available data set. The selected metrics were calculated on the basis of three groups of 10 s recordings and their average, two groups of 30 s recordings and their average, and a group of 60 s recordings taken from the full-length recordings and then compared with metrics derived from the corresponding reference (PPG) pulse waveform signals by using correlation and effect size parameters, and Bland–Altman plots. Main results The results show there is stronger agreement as the recording length increases for SDNN and RMSSD, yet there is no significant change for pNN50. The agreement parameters reach r = 0.841 (p < 0.001), r = 0.529 (p < 0.001), and r = 0.657 (p < 0.001), estimated median bias −1.52, −2.28 ms and −1.95% and a small effect size for SDNN, RMSSD, and pNN50 derived from the 60 s recordings, respectively. Significance Remote photoplethysmography-derived UST-PRV metrics manage to capture UST-PRV metrics derived from reference (PPG) recordings well. This feature is highly desirable in numerous applications for the assessment of one’s health and well-being. In future research, the validity of rPPG-derived UST-PRV metrics compared to the gold standard electrocardiography recordings is to be assessed.

scholarly journals Assessment of ROI Selection for Facial Video-Based rPPG

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 7923
Author(s):  
Dae-Yeol Kim ◽  
Kwangkee Lee ◽  
Chae-Bong Sohn
Keyword(s):  
Region Of Interest ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Skin Thickness ◽  
Facial Image ◽  
Remote Photoplethysmography ◽  
The Face ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Evaluation Metric ◽  
Volume Pulse ◽  
Blood Volume Pulse

In general, facial image-based remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) methods use color-based and patch-based region-of-interest (ROI) selection methods to estimate the blood volume pulse (BVP) and beats per minute (BPM). Anatomically, the thickness of the skin is not uniform in all areas of the face, so the same diffuse reflection information cannot be obtained in each area. In recent years, various studies have presented experimental results for their ROIs but did not provide a valid rationale for the proposed regions. In this paper, to see the effect of skin thickness on the accuracy of the rPPG algorithm, we conducted an experiment on 39 anatomically divided facial regions. Experiments were performed with seven algorithms (CHROM, GREEN, ICA, PBV, POS, SSR, and LGI) using the UBFC-rPPG and LGI-PPGI datasets considering 29 selected regions and two adjusted regions out of 39 anatomically classified regions. We proposed a BVP similarity evaluation metric to find a region with high accuracy. We conducted additional experiments on the TOP-5 regions and BOT-5 regions and presented the validity of the proposed ROIs. The TOP-5 regions showed relatively high accuracy compared to the previous algorithm’s ROI, suggesting that the anatomical characteristics of the ROI should be considered when developing a facial image-based rPPG algorithm.

scholarly journals Differential effects of the blood pressure state on pulse rate variability and heart rate variability in critically ill patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Mejía-Mejía ◽  
James M. May ◽  
Mohamed Elgendi ◽  
Panayiotis A. Kyriacou
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
Pulse Rate ◽  
Pulse Transit Time ◽  
Pulse Rate Variability ◽  
Physiological Factors ◽  
Ecg Signals ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Electrocardiogram Ecg

AbstractHeart rate variability (HRV) utilizes the electrocardiogram (ECG) and has been widely studied as a non-invasive indicator of cardiac autonomic activity. Pulse rate variability (PRV) utilizes photoplethysmography (PPG) and recently has been used as a surrogate for HRV. Several studies have found that PRV is not entirely valid as an estimation of HRV and that several physiological factors, including the pulse transit time (PTT) and blood pressure (BP) changes, may affect PRV differently than HRV. This study aimed to assess the relationship between PRV and HRV under different BP states: hypotension, normotension, and hypertension. Using the MIMIC III database, 5 min segments of PPG and ECG signals were used to extract PRV and HRV, respectively. Several time-domain, frequency-domain, and nonlinear indices were obtained from these signals. Bland–Altman analysis, correlation analysis, and Friedman rank sum tests were used to compare HRV and PRV in each state, and PRV and HRV indices were compared among BP states using Kruskal–Wallis tests. The findings indicated that there were differences between PRV and HRV, especially in short-term and nonlinear indices, and although PRV and HRV were altered in a similar manner when there was a change in BP, PRV seemed to be more sensitive to these changes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document