scholarly journals A Review on Systems-Based Sensory Gloves for Sign Language Recognition State of the Art between 2007 and 2017

Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 2208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Aktham Ahmed ◽  
Bilal Bahaa Zaidan ◽  
Aws Alaa Zaidan ◽  
Mahmood Maher Salih ◽  
Muhammad Modi bin Lakulu
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition

scholarly journals A comparison of convolutional neural networks for Kazakh sign language recognition

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2 (113)) ◽  
pp. 44-54
Author(s):  
Chingiz Kenshimov ◽  
Samat Mukhanov ◽  
Timur Merembayev ◽  
Didar Yedilkhan
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Sign Language ◽  
Convolutional Neural Networks ◽  
Gesture Recognition ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Hand Gesture ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Important Means ◽  
Complex Relationships

For people with disabilities, sign language is the most important means of communication. Therefore, more and more authors of various papers and scientists around the world are proposing solutions to use intelligent hand gesture recognition systems. Such a system is aimed not only for those who wish to understand a sign language, but also speak using gesture recognition software. In this paper, a new benchmark dataset for Kazakh fingerspelling, able to train deep neural networks, is introduced. The dataset contains more than 10122 gesture samples for 42 alphabets. The alphabet has its own peculiarities as some characters are shown in motion, which may influence sign recognition. Research and analysis of convolutional neural networks, comparison, testing, results and analysis of LeNet, AlexNet, ResNet and EffectiveNet – EfficientNetB7 methods are described in the paper. EffectiveNet architecture is state-of-the-art (SOTA) and is supposed to be a new one compared to other architectures under consideration. On this dataset, we showed that the LeNet and EffectiveNet networks outperform other competing algorithms. Moreover, EffectiveNet can achieve state-of-the-art performance on nother hand gesture datasets. The architecture and operation principle of these algorithms reflect the effectiveness of their application in sign language recognition. The evaluation of the CNN model score is conducted by using the accuracy and penalty matrix. During training epochs, LeNet and EffectiveNet showed better results: accuracy and loss function had similar and close trends. The results of EffectiveNet were explained by the tools of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework. SHAP explored the model to detect complex relationships between features in the images. Focusing on the SHAP tool may help to further improve the accuracy of the model

3D Technologies and Applications in Sign Language

2020 ◽  
pp. 50-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiriakos Stefanidis ◽  
Dimitrios Konstantinidis ◽  
Athanasios Kalvourtzis ◽  
Kosmas Dimitropoulos ◽  
Petros Daras
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Everyday Life ◽  
Sign Language ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Current State ◽  
Future Work

Millions of people suffering from partial or complete hearing loss use variants of sign language to communicate with each other or hearing people in their everyday life. Thus, it is imperative to develop systems to assist these people by removing the barriers that affect their social inclusion. These systems should aim towards capturing sign language in an accurate way, classifying sign language to natural words and representing sign language by having avatars or synthesized videos execute the exact same moves that convey a meaning in the sign language. This chapter reviews current state-of-the-art approaches that attempt to solve sign language recognition and representation and analyzes the challenges they face. Furthermore, this chapter presents a novel AI-based solution to the problem of robust sign language capturing and representation, as well as a solution to the unavailability of annotated sign language datasets before limitations and directions for future work are discussed.

INDIAN SIGN LANGUAGE RECOGNITION SYSTEM USING OPENPOSE

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
MALHOTRA POOJA ◽  
K. MANIAR CHIRAG ◽  
V. SANKPAL NIKHIL ◽  
R. THAKKAR HARDIK ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Recognition System ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Indian Sign Language

STATIC DEVNAGARI SIGN LANGUAGE RECOGNITION

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
VERMA VERSHA ◽  
PATIL SANDEEP B. ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition

Technological Aids for Deaf and Mute in Modern World

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasu Mehra ◽  
Dhiraj Pandey ◽  
Aayush Rastogi ◽  
Aditya Singh ◽  
Harsh Preet Singh
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Gesture Recognition ◽  
Recognition System ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Background Elimination ◽  
Sign Recognition ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Better Than

Background:: People suffering from hearing and speaking disabilities have a few ways of communicating with other people. One of these is to communicate through the use of sign language. Objective:: Developing a system for sign language recognition becomes essential for deaf as well as a mute person. The recognition system acts as a translator between a disabled and an able person. This eliminates the hindrances in exchange of ideas. Most of the existing systems are very poorly designed with limited support for the needs of their day to day facilities. Methods:: The proposed system embedded with gesture recognition capability has been introduced here which extracts signs from a video sequence and displays them on screen. On the other hand, a speech to text as well as text to speech system is also introduced to further facilitate the grieved people. To get the best out of human computer relationship, the proposed solution consists of various cutting-edge technologies and Machine Learning based sign recognition models which have been trained by using Tensor Flow and Keras library. Result:: The proposed architecture works better than several gesture recognition techniques like background elimination and conversion to HSV because of sharply defined image provided to the model for classification. The results of testing indicate reliable recognition systems with high accuracy that includes most of the essential and necessary features for any deaf and dumb person in his/her day to day tasks. Conclusion:: It’s the need of current technological advances to develop reliable solutions which can be deployed to assist deaf and dumb people to adjust to normal life. Instead of focusing on a standalone technology, a plethora of them have been introduced in this proposed work. Proposed Sign Recognition System is based on feature extraction and classification. The trained model helps in identification of different gestures.

Indian Sign Language Recognition on PYNQ Board

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhendra Singh ◽  
G. N. Rathna ◽  
Vivek Singhal
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Hand Gesture ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Hand Gestures ◽  
Depth Images ◽  
Kinect Camera ◽  
Impaired People ◽  
Web Camera ◽  
Indian Sign Language

Introduction: Sign language is the only way to communicate for speech-impaired people. But this sign language is not known to normal people so this is the cause of barrier in communicating. This is the problem faced by speech impaired people. In this paper, we have presented our solution which captured hand gestures with Kinect camera and classified the hand gesture into its correct symbol. Method: We used Kinect camera not the ordinary web camera because the ordinary camera does not capture its 3d orientation or depth of an image from camera however Kinect camera can capture 3d image and this will make classification more accurate. Result: Kinect camera will produce a different image for hand gestures for ‘2’ and ‘V’ and similarly for ‘1’ and ‘I’ however, normal web camera will not be able to distinguish between these two. We used hand gesture for Indian sign language and our dataset had 46339, RGB images and 46339 depth images. 80% of the total images were used for training and the remaining 20% for testing. In total 36 hand gestures were considered to capture alphabets and alphabets from A-Z and 10 for numeric, 26 for digits from 0-9 were considered to capture alphabets and Keywords. Conclusion: Along with real-time implementation, we have also shown the comparison of the performance of the various machine learning models in which we have found out the accuracy of CNN on depth- images has given the most accurate performance than other models. All these resulted were obtained on PYNQ Z2 board.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document