INDIAN SIGN LANGUAGE RECOGNITION SYSTEM USING OPENPOSE

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
MALHOTRA POOJA ◽  
K. MANIAR CHIRAG ◽  
V. SANKPAL NIKHIL ◽  
R. THAKKAR HARDIK ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Recognition System ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Indian Sign Language

scholarly journals An Efficient Indian Sign Language Recognition System using Sift Descriptor

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1456-1461
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Fitness Function ◽  
Hand Movement ◽  
Back Propagation ◽  
Recognition System ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Scale Invariant ◽  
Feed Forward Back Propagation ◽  
Indian Sign Language

Communication is one of the basic requirements for living in the world. Deaf and dumb people convey through Sign Language but normal people have difficulty to understand their language. In order to provide a source of medium between normal and differently abled people, Sign Language Recognition System (SLR) is a solution . American Sign Language (ASL) has attracted many researchers’ attention but Indian Sign Language Recognition (ISLR) is significantly different from ASL due to different phonetic, grammar and hand movement. Designing a system for Indian Sign Language Recognition becomes a difficult task. ISLR system uses Indian Sign Language (ISL) dataset for recognition but suffers from problem of scaling, object orientation and lack of optimal feature set. In this paper to address these issues, Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) as a descriptor is used. It extracts the features that train the Feed Forward Back Propagation Neural Network (FFBPNN) and optimize it using Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) according to the fitness function. The dataset has been collected for alphabet from the video by extracting frames and for numbers it has been created manually from deaf and dumb students of NGO “Sarthak”. It has been shown through simulation results that there has been significant improvement in accurately identifying alphabets and numbers with an average accuracy of 99.43%

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document