scholarly journals Sea Ice Concentration and Sea Ice Extent Mapping with L-Band Microwave Radiometry and GNSS-R Data from the FFSCat Mission Using Neural Networks

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1139
Author(s):  
David Llaveria ◽  
Juan Francesc Munoz-Martin ◽  
Christoph Herbert ◽  
Miriam Pablos ◽  
Hyuk Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Neural Network Approach ◽  
Ice Concentration ◽  
L Band ◽  
Moderate Cost

CubeSat-based Earth Observation missions have emerged in recent times, achieving scientifically valuable data at a moderate cost. FSSCat is a two 6U CubeSats mission, winner of the ESA S3 challenge and overall winner of the 2017 Copernicus Masters Competition, that was launched in September 2020. The first satellite, 3Cat-5/A, carries the FMPL-2 instrument, an L-band microwave radiometer and a GNSS-Reflectometer. This work presents a neural network approach for retrieving sea ice concentration and sea ice extent maps on the Arctic and the Antarctic oceans using FMPL-2 data. The results from the first months of operations are presented and analyzed, and the quality of the retrieved maps is assessed by comparing them with other existing sea ice concentration maps. As compared to OSI SAF products, the overall accuracy for the sea ice extent maps is greater than 97% using MWR data, and up to 99% when using combined GNSS-R and MWR data. In the case of Sea ice concentration, the absolute errors are lower than 5%, with MWR and lower than 3% combining it with the GNSS-R. The total extent area computed using this methodology is close, with 2.5% difference, to those computed by other well consolidated algorithms, such as OSI SAF or NSIDC. The approach presented for estimating sea ice extent and concentration maps is a cost-effective alternative, and using a constellation of CubeSats, it can be further improved.

scholarly journals Ice Concentration Retrieval from the Analysis of Microwaves: A New Methodology Designed for the Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise Kilic ◽  
Catherine Prigent ◽  
Filipe Aires ◽  
Georg Heygster ◽  
Victor Pellet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Optimal Estimation ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Ice Concentration

Over the last 25 years, the Arctic sea ice has seen its extent decline dramatically. Passive microwave observations, with their ability to penetrate clouds and their independency to sunlight, have been used to provide sea ice concentration (SIC) measurements since the 1970s. The Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer (CIMR) is a high priority candidate mission within the European Copernicus Expansion program, with a special focus on the observation of the polar regions. It will observe at 6.9 and 10.65 GHz with 15 km spatial resolution, and at 18.7 and 36.5 GHz with 5 km spatial resolution. SIC algorithms are based on empirical methods, using the difference in radiometric signatures between the ocean and sea ice. Up to now, the existing algorithms have been limited in the number of channels they use. In this study, we proposed a new SIC algorithm called Ice Concentration REtrieval from the Analysis of Microwaves (IceCREAM). It can accommodate a large range of channels, and it is based on the optimal estimation. Linear relationships between the satellite measurements and the SIC are derived from the Round Robin Data Package of the sea ice Climate Change Initiative. The 6 and 10 GHz channels are very sensitive to the sea ice presence, whereas the 18 and 36 GHz channels have a better spatial resolution. A data fusion method is proposed to combine these two estimations. Therefore, IceCREAM will provide SIC estimates with the good accuracy of the 6+10GHz combination, and the high spatial resolution of the 18+36GHz combination.

scholarly journals Changes of the Arctic marginal ice zone during the satellite era

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1971-1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Rolph ◽  
Daniel L. Feltham ◽  
David Schröder
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Satellite Observations ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Upper And Lower Bounds ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Ice Concentration ◽  
Marginal Ice Zone ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract. Many studies have shown a decrease in Arctic sea ice extent. It does not logically follow, however, that the extent of the marginal ice zone (MIZ), here defined as the area of the ocean with ice concentrations from 15 % to 80 %, is also changing. Changes in the MIZ extent has implications for the level of atmospheric and ocean heat and gas exchange in the area of partially ice-covered ocean and for the extent of habitat for organisms that rely on the MIZ, from primary producers like sea ice algae to seals and birds. Here, we present, for the first time, an analysis of satellite observations of pan-Arctic averaged MIZ extent. We find no trend in the MIZ extent over the last 40 years from observations. Our results indicate that the constancy of the MIZ extent is the result of an observed increase in width of the MIZ being compensated for by a decrease in the perimeter of the MIZ as it moves further north. We present simulations from a coupled sea ice–ocean mixed layer model using a prognostic floe size distribution, which we find is consistent with, but poorly constrained by, existing satellite observations of pan-Arctic MIZ extent. We provide seasonal upper and lower bounds on MIZ extent based on the four satellite-derived sea ice concentration datasets used. We find a large and significant increase (>50 %) in the August and September MIZ fraction (MIZ extent divided by sea ice extent) for the Bootstrap and OSI-450 observational datasets, which can be attributed to the reduction in total sea ice extent. Given the results of this study, we suggest that references to “rapid changes” in the MIZ should remain cautious and provide a specific and clear definition of both the MIZ itself and also the property of the MIZ that is changing.

scholarly journals Presentation and evaluation of the Arctic sea ice forecasting system neXtSIM-F

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3207-3227
Author(s):  
Timothy Williams ◽  
Anton Korosov ◽  
Pierre Rampal ◽  
Einar Ólason
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Ice Concentration ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Ice Model

Abstract. The neXtSIM-F (neXtSIM forecast) forecasting system consists of a stand-alone sea ice model, neXtSIM (neXt-generation Sea Ice Model), forced by the TOPAZ ocean forecast and the ECMWF atmospheric forecast, combined with daily data assimilation of sea ice concentration. It uses the novel brittle Bingham–Maxwell (BBM) sea ice rheology, making it the first forecast based on a continuum model not to use the viscous–plastic (VP) rheology. It was tested in the Arctic for the time period November 2018–June 2020 and was found to perform well, although there are some shortcomings. Despite drift not being assimilated in our system, the sea ice drift is good throughout the year, being relatively unbiased, even for longer lead times like 5 d. The RMSE in speed and the total RMSE are also good for the first 3 or so days, although they both increase steadily with lead time. The thickness distribution is relatively good, although there are some regions that experience excessive thickening with negative implications for the summertime sea ice extent, particularly in the Greenland Sea. The neXtSIM-F forecasting system assimilates OSI SAF sea ice concentration products (both SSMIS and AMSR2) by modifying the initial conditions daily and adding a compensating heat flux to prevent removed ice growing back too quickly. The assimilation greatly improves the sea ice extent for the forecast duration.

scholarly journals Sea ice and water classification on dual-polarized Sentinel-1 imagery during melting season

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Tingting Zhu ◽  
Gunnar Spreen ◽  
Christian Melsheimer ◽  
Marcus Huntemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Fram Strait ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Water Classification ◽  
Sar Data ◽  
Ice Water ◽  
Melting Season

Abstract. We provide a new sea ice and water classification product with high spatial and high temporal coverage using Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data. The classification is applied in the Fram Strait region in the Arctic during melting seasons, when the contrast between backscatter intensities of different ice types observed by SAR is reduced due to the melted ice surface and wet snow on sea ice. The wet or melted snow strongly reduces the SAR penetration depth and thus suppresses the volume scattering contribution of sea ice. Furthermore, within the marginal sea ice zone (MIZ)ambiguities between ice and water can result from the effects of winds and ocean currents on the ocean SAR backscatter. On the other hand, under calm conditions the contrast between thin ice and flat open water can be reduced, and thusdecrease the separability of some ice. In summary, the melting season represents the most challenging time of the year forreliable ice-water classification from SAR data. We propose here a new approach to overcome these problems by using amixture statistical distribution based conditional random fields (MSTA-CRF) model. To obtain reliable ice-waterclassification whilst maintaining a fast computation time suitable for operational applications, the MSTA-CRF adopts a superpixel approach in the fully connected CRF model. The MSTA-CRF is a semantic model, which integrates statisticaldistributions (Gamma, Weibull, Alpha-Stable, etc.) to model the backscatters of ice and water and overcome the effects ofspeckle noise and wind-roughened water. Dual-polarization Extended Wide (EW) mode Sentinel-1A/1B SAR data with40 m spatial resolution is available several times per day within the Fram Strait region. Observations from June toSeptember during the six years 2015–2020 are collected and classified into ice and water categories. The classification performance of algorithm is evaluated using ice charts from the Ice Service at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute(MET Norway). The methods of training sample selection, and their application to processing large data volumes andautomatic classification of ice-water are discussed. In the experiment part, we demonstrate that the MSTA-CRF can providea good performance with about 90 % accuracy for ice-water classification, which is better than most of other state-of-theart algorithms. Compared with the 89 GHz microwave radiometer ASI sea ice concentration product, the sea ice extent in Fram Strait derived from MSTA-CRF algorithm is lower during melting seasons from 2015 to 2020, and the monthly Juneto September sea ice area does not change so much in 2015–2017 and 2019–2020, but it has a significant decrease in 2018.

scholarly journals New methodology to estimate Arctic sea ice concentration from SMOS combining brightness temperature differences in a maximum-likelihood estimator

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1987-2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Gabarro ◽  
Antonio Turiel ◽  
Pedro Elosegui ◽  
Joaquim A. Pla-Resina ◽  
Marcos Portabella
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Arctic Sea ◽  
Ice Concentration ◽  
L Band

Abstract. Monitoring sea ice concentration is required for operational and climate studies in the Arctic Sea. Technologies used so far for estimating sea ice concentration have some limitations, for instance the impact of the atmosphere, the physical temperature of ice, and the presence of snow and melting. In the last years, L-band radiometry has been successfully used to study some properties of sea ice, remarkably sea ice thickness. However, the potential of satellite L-band observations for obtaining sea ice concentration had not yet been explored. In this paper, we present preliminary evidence showing that data from the Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission can be used to estimate sea ice concentration. Our method, based on a maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE), exploits the marked difference in the radiative properties of sea ice and seawater. In addition, the brightness temperatures of 100 % sea ice and 100 % seawater, as well as their combined values (polarization and angular difference), have been shown to be very stable during winter and spring, so they are robust to variations in physical temperature and other geophysical parameters. Therefore, we can use just two sets of tie points, one for summer and another for winter, for calculating sea ice concentration, leading to a more robust estimate. After analysing the full year 2014 in the entire Arctic, we have found that the sea ice concentration obtained with our method is well determined as compared to the Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI SAF) dataset. However, when thin sea ice is present (ice thickness ≲ 0.6 m), the method underestimates the actual sea ice concentration.

scholarly journals Antarctic summer sea ice concentration and extent: comparison of ODEN 2006 ship observations, satellite passive microwave and NIC sea ice charts

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Ozsoy-Cicek ◽  
H. Xie ◽  
S. F. Ackley ◽  
K. Ye
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Linear Trend ◽  
Passive Microwave ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Ice Concentration ◽  
Ice Edge

Abstract. Antarctic sea ice cover has shown a slight increase in overall observed ice extent as derived from satellite mapping from 1979 to 2008, contrary to the decline observed in the Arctic regions. Spatial and temporal variations of the Antarctic sea ice however remain a significant problem to monitor and understand, primarily due to the vastness and remoteness of the region. While satellite remote sensing has provided and has great future potential to monitor the variations and changes of sea ice, uncertainties remain unresolved. In this study, the National Ice Center (NIC) ice edge and the AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer – Earth Observing System) ice extent are examined, while the ASPeCt (Antarctic Sea Ice Process and Climate) ship observations from the Oden expedition in December 2006 are used as ground truth to verify the two products during Antarctic summer. While there is a general linear trend between ASPeCt and AMSR-E ice concentration estimates, there is poor correlation (R2=0.41) and AMSR-E tends to underestimate the low ice concentrations. We also found that the NIC sea ice edge agrees well with ship observations, while the AMSR-E shows the ice edge further south, consistent with its poorer detection of low ice concentrations. The northward extent of the ice edge at the time of observation (NIC) had mean values varying from 38 km to 102 km greater on different days for the area as compared with the AMSR-E sea ice extent. For the circumpolar area as a whole in the December period examined, AMSR-E therefore underestimates the area inside the ice edge at this time by up to 14% or, 1.5 million km2 less area, compared to the NIC ice charts. These differences alone can account for more than half of the purported sea ice loss between the pre 1960s and the satellite era suggested earlier from comparative analysis of whale catch data with satellite derived data. Preliminary comparison of satellite scatterometer data suggests better resolution of low concentrations than passive microwave, and therefore better fidelity with ship observations and NIC charts of the area inside the ice edge during Antarctic summer.

scholarly journals The EUMETSAT sea ice climate record

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Tonboe ◽  
S. Eastwood ◽  
T. Lavergne ◽  
A. M. Sørensen ◽  
N. Rathmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Open Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Radiative Transfer Model ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Ice Concentration ◽  
Microwave Imager

Abstract. An Arctic and Antarctic sea ice area and extent dataset has been generated by EUMETSAT's Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSISAF) using the record of American microwave radiometer data from Nimbus 7 Scanning Multichannel Microwave radiometer (SMMR) and the Defense Meteorological satellite Program (DMSP) Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) and Special Sensor Microwave Imager and Sounder (SSMIS) satellite sensors. The dataset covers the period from 1978 to 2014 and updates and further developments are planned for the next phase of the project. The methodology is using: 1) numerical weather prediction (NWP) input to a radiative transfer model (RTM) for correction of the brightness temperatures for reduction of atmospheric noise, 2) dynamical algorithm tie-points to mitigate trends in residual atmospheric, sea ice and water emission characteristics and inter-sensor differences/biases, 3) and a hybrid sea ice concentration algorithm using the Bristol algorithm over ice and the Bootstrap algorithm in frequency mode over open water. A new algorithm has been developed to estimate the spatially and temporally varying sea ice concentration uncertainties. A comparison to sea ice charts from the Arctic and the Antarctic shows that ice concentrations are higher in the ice charts than estimated from the radiometer data at intermediate ice concentrations. The sea ice climate dataset is available for download at (www.osisaf.org) including documentation.

Sea Ice Concentration and Sea Ice Extent Mapping with the Fsscat Mission: A Neural Network Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Llaveria ◽  
Juan Francesc Munoz-Martin ◽  
Christoph Herbert ◽  
Miriam Pablos ◽  
Adriano Camps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Network Approach ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Neural Network Approach ◽  
Ice Concentration

scholarly journals Consistent Comparison of Remotely Sensed Sea Ice Concentration Products with ERA-Interim Reanalysis Data in Polar Regions

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 2880
Author(s):  
Shuang Liang ◽  
Jiangyuan Zeng ◽  
Zhen Li ◽  
Dejing Qiao ◽  
Ping Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Climate Change Research ◽  
Ice Concentration

Sea ice concentration (SIC) plays a significant role in climate change research and ship’s navigation in polar regions. Satellite-based SIC products have become increasingly abundant in recent years; however, the uncertainty of these products still exists and needs to be further investigated. To comprehensively evaluate the consistency of the SIC derived from different SIC algorithms in long time series and the whole polar regions, we compared four passive microwave (PM) satellite SIC products with the ERA-Interim sea ice fraction dataset during the period of 2015–2018. The PM SIC products include the SSMIS/ASI, AMSR2/BT, the Chinese FY3B/NT2, and FY3C/NT2. The results show that the remotely sensed SIC products derived from different SIC algorithms are generally in good consistency. The spatial and temporal distribution of discrepancy among satellite SIC products for both Arctic and Antarctic regions are also observed. The most noticeable difference for all the four SIC products mostly occurs in summer and at the marginal ice zone, indicating that large uncertainties exist in satellite SIC products in such period and areas. The SSMIS/ASI and AMSR2/BT show relatively better consistency with ERA-Interim in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively, but they exhibit opposite bias (dry/wet) relative to the ERA-Interim data. The sea ice extent (SIE) and sea ice area (SIA) derived from PM and ERA-Interim SIC were also compared. It is found that the difference of PM SIE and SIA varies seasonally, which is in line with that of PM SIC, and the discrepancy between PM and ERA-Interim data is larger in Arctic than in Antarctic. We also noticed that different algorithms have different performances in different regions and periods; therefore, the hybrid of multiple algorithms is a promising way to improve the accuracy of SIC retrievals. It is expected that our findings can contribute to improving the satellite SIC algorithms and thus promote the application of these useful products in global climate change studies.

scholarly journals Perspectives on future sea ice and navigability in the Arctic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinlei Chen ◽  
Shichang Kang ◽  
Wentao Du ◽  
Junming Guo ◽  
Min Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Open Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Northwest Passage ◽  
Ice Concentration ◽  
Transportation Accessibility

Abstract. The retreat of sea ice is very significant in the Arctic under global warming. It is projected to continue and have great impacts on navigation. In this investigation, decadal changes in sea ice parameters were evaluated by multimodel from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, and Arctic navigability was assessed under two shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) and two vessel classes within the Arctic transportation accessibility model. The sea ice extent is expected to decrease along the SSP5-8.5 scenario with a high possibility under current emissions and climate change. The decadal decreasing rate will increase in March but decrease in September until 2060 when the oldest ice completely disappears and sea ice changes reach an irreversible tipping point. The sea ice thickness will decrease and transit in parts of the Arctic and will decline overall by −0.22 m per decade after September 2060. Both the sea ice concentration and volume will thoroughly decline with decreasing decadal rates, while the decrease in volume will be higher in March than in September. Open water ships will be able to cross the Northeast Passage and Northwest Passage in August–October 2045–2055, with a maximum navigable area in September. The opportunistic crossing time for polar class 6 (PC6) ships will advance to October–December in 2021–2030, while the maximum navigable area will be seen in October. In addition, the Central Passage will also open for PC6 ships during September–October in 2021–2030.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document