scholarly journals Formation Control for a Fleet of Autonomous Ground Vehicles: A Survey

Robotics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aakash Soni ◽  
Huosheng Hu
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Vehicles ◽  
Formation Control ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Autonomous Vehicle ◽  
Ground Vehicles ◽  
Implementation Challenges ◽  
Autonomous Ground Vehicles ◽  
Vehicle Platooning ◽  
And Control

Autonomous/unmanned driving is the major state-of-the-art step that has a potential to fundamentally transform the mobility of individuals and goods. At present, most of the developments target standalone autonomous vehicles, which can sense the surroundings and control the vehicle based on this perception, with limited or no driver intervention. This paper focuses on the next step in autonomous vehicle research, which is the collaboration between autonomous vehicles, mainly vehicle formation control or vehicle platooning. To gain a deeper understanding in this area, a large number of the existing published papers have been reviewed systemically. In other words, many distributed and decentralized approaches of vehicle formation control are studied and their implementations are discussed. Finally, both technical and implementation challenges for formation control are summarized.

Proportional Navigation and Model Predictive Control of an Unmanned Autonomous Vehicle for Obstacle Avoidance

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan P. Shaw ◽  
David M. Bevly
Keyword(s):  
Obstacle Avoidance ◽  
Autonomous Vehicle ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
Reference Trajectory ◽  
Ground Vehicles ◽  
Proportional Navigation ◽  
Predictive Controller ◽  
Proportional Navigation Law ◽  
Vehicle Dynamic Model ◽  
And Control

This paper presents a new approach for the guidance and control of a UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle). An obstacle avoidance algorithm was developed using an integrated system involving proportional navigation (PN) and a nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC). An obstacle avoidance variant of the classical proportional navigation law generates command lateral accelerations to avoid obstacles, while the NMPC is used to track the reference trajectory given by the PN. The NMPC utilizes a lateral vehicle dynamic model. Obstacle avoidance has become a popular area of research for both unmanned aerial vehicles and unmanned ground vehicles. In this application an obstacle avoidance algorithm can take over the control of a vehicle until the obstacle is no longer a threat. The performance of the obstacle avoidance algorithm is evaluated through simulation. Simulation results show a promising approach to conditionally implemented obstacle avoidance.

scholarly journals An Overview of Lidar Imaging Systems for Autonomous Vehicles

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
pp. 4093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Royo ◽  
Maria Ballesta-Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Vehicles ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Autonomous Vehicle ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Imaging Systems ◽  
Light Sources ◽  
Final Solution ◽  
Large Uncertainty ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Subject

Lidar imaging systems are one of the hottest topics in the optronics industry. The need to sense the surroundings of every autonomous vehicle has pushed forward a race dedicated to deciding the final solution to be implemented. However, the diversity of state-of-the-art approaches to the solution brings a large uncertainty on the decision of the dominant final solution. Furthermore, the performance data of each approach often arise from different manufacturers and developers, which usually have some interest in the dispute. Within this paper, we intend to overcome the situation by providing an introductory, neutral overview of the technology linked to lidar imaging systems for autonomous vehicles, and its current state of development. We start with the main single-point measurement principles utilized, which then are combined with different imaging strategies, also described in the paper. An overview of the features of the light sources and photodetectors specific to lidar imaging systems most frequently used in practice is also presented. Finally, a brief section on pending issues for lidar development in autonomous vehicles has been included, in order to present some of the problems which still need to be solved before implementation may be considered as final. The reader is provided with a detailed bibliography containing both relevant books and state-of-the-art papers for further progress in the subject.

scholarly journals Canonical instabilities of autonomous vehicle systems

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrick Wallace
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Control ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Autonomous Vehicle ◽  
Power Network ◽  
Ground Vehicles ◽  
The Road ◽  
Control Information ◽  
Formal Argument ◽  
Vehicle Systems ◽  
And Control

Formal argument suggests that command, communication and control systems can remain stable in the sense of the Data Rate Theorem that mandates the minimum rate of control information required to stabilize inherently unstable 'plants', but may nonetheless, under fog-of-war demands, collapse into dysfunctional modes at variance with their fundamental mission. We apply the theory to autonomous ground vehicles under intelligent traffic control in which swarms of interacting, self-driving devices are inherently unstable as a consequence of the basic irregularity of the road network. It appears that such 'V2V/V2I' systems will experience large-scale failures analogous to the vast propagating fronts of power network blackouts, and possibly less benign, but more subtle patterns of `psychopathology' at various scales.

scholarly journals Space Invaders: Pedestrian Proxemic Utility Functions and Trust Zones for Autonomous Vehicle Interactions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanta Camara ◽  
Charles Fox
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Vehicles ◽  
Autonomous Vehicle ◽  
Utility Functions ◽  
Hyperbolic Function ◽  
The Road ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Public Datasets ◽  
Discrete Theory ◽  
And Control ◽  
Road Crossing

AbstractUnderstanding pedestrian proxemic utility and trust will help autonomous vehicles to plan and control interactions with pedestrians more safely and efficiently. When pedestrians cross the road in front of human-driven vehicles, the two agents use knowledge of each other’s preferences to negotiate and to determine who will yield to the other. Autonomous vehicles will require similar understandings, but previous work has shown a need for them to be provided in the form of continuous proxemic utility functions, which are not available from previous proxemics studies based on Hall’s discrete zones. To fill this gap, a new Bayesian method to infer continuous pedestrian proxemic utility functions is proposed, and related to a new definition of ‘physical trust requirement’ (PTR) for road-crossing scenarios. The method is validated on simulation data then its parameters are inferred empirically from two public datasets. Results show that pedestrian proxemic utility is best described by a hyperbolic function, and that trust by the pedestrian is required in a discrete ‘trust zone’ which emerges naturally from simple physics. The PTR concept is then shown to be capable of generating and explaining the empirically observed zone sizes of Hall’s discrete theory of proxemics.

scholarly journals Autonomous Driving—A Crash Explained in Detail

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (23) ◽  
pp. 5126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betz ◽  
Heilmeier ◽  
Wischnewski ◽  
Stahl ◽  
Lienkamp
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Vehicles ◽  
Autonomous Vehicle ◽  
Autonomous Driving ◽  
Software Test ◽  
Planning And Control ◽  
Modular Software ◽  
Fatal Crash ◽  
Detailed Explanation ◽  
A Minor ◽  
And Control

Since 2017, a research team from the Technical University of Munich has developed a software stack for autonomous driving. The software was used to participate in the Roborace Season Alpha Championship. The championship aims to achieve autonomous race cars competing with different software stacks against each other. In May 2019, during a software test in Modena, Italy, the greatest danger in autonomous driving became reality: A minor change in environmental influences led an extensively tested software to crash into a barrier at speed. Crashes with autonomous vehicles have happened before but a detailed explanation of why software failed and what part of the software was not working correctly is missing in research articles. In this paper we present a general method that can be used to display an autonomous vehicle disengagement to explain in detail what happened. This method is then used to display and explain the crash from Modena. Firstly a brief introduction into the modular software stack that was used in the Modena event, consisting of three individual parts—perception, planning, and control—is given. Furthermore, the circumstancescausing the crash are elaborated in detail. By presented and explaining in detail which softwarepart failed and contributed to the crash we can discuss further software improvements. As a result, we present necessary functions that need to be integrated in an autonomous driving software stack to prevent such a vehicle behavior causing a fatal crash. In addition we suggest an enhancement of the current disengagement reports for autonomous driving regarding a detailed explanation of the software part that was causing the disengagement. In the outlook of this paper we present two additional software functions for assessing the tire and control performance of the vehicle to enhance the autonomous.

Road-following formation control of autonomous ground vehicles

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Ono ◽  
Greg Droge ◽  
Havard Grip ◽  
Olivier Toupet ◽  
Chris Scrapper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Formation Control ◽  
Ground Vehicles ◽  
Autonomous Ground Vehicles ◽  
Road Following
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document