scholarly journals Philistine Cult and Religion According to Archaeological Evidence

Religions ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
David Ben-Shlomo
Keyword(s):  
Iron Age ◽  
Popular Religion ◽  
Archaeological Evidence ◽  
Cultural Elements ◽  
Iron Age Ii ◽  
Iron Age I ◽  
Textual Records

The paper surveys and discusses the updated archaeological evidence for Philistine cult and religion, and cult and religion in Philistia during the Iron Age. The evidence can be related to public or official cult, represented in temple and shrine structures, and to that coming from households, representing possibly more popular religion. The evidence of public cult, so far mostly from peripheral sites, includes largely cultural elements linked with the local Canaanite cult and religion. Yet, within households at the Philistine cities there is more evidence for cultic elements of Aegean affinity during Iron Age I. In particular, figurines and ceramic figurative vessels and objects will be discussed. It seems that the Philistine religion may have retained certain distinctive elements also during Iron Age II. Nevertheless, it is still difficult to reconstruct the details of the nature of the Philistine religion due to the limited amount of evidence and lack of textual records.

scholarly journals 14C Dates and the Iron Age Chronology of Israel: A Response

Radiocarbon ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amihai Mazar ◽  
Christopher Bronk Ramsey
Keyword(s):  
Iron Age ◽  
Eastern Mediterranean ◽  
Bayesian Models ◽  
Age Dating ◽  
Radiocarbon Dates ◽  
Iron Age Ii ◽  
Iron Age I ◽  
Mediterranean Archaeology ◽  
Historical Periods ◽  
Probability Range

Boaretto et al. (2005) published 68 radiocarbon dates relating to 30 samples from 10 Iron Age sites in Israel as part of their Early Iron Age Dating Project. Though the main goal of their paper was an interlaboratory comparison, they also presented results of Bayesian models, calculating the transition from Iron Age I to Iron Age II in Israel to be about 900 BCE instead of the conventional date of about 1000 BCE. Since this date has great importance for all of Eastern Mediterranean archaeology, in this paper we examine the results in light of the dates published in the above-mentioned article. Our paper was revised in light of new data and interpretations published by Sharon et al. (2007).Following a survey of the contexts and specific results at each site, we present several Bayesian models. Model C2 suggests the date range of 961–942 BCE (68% probability) for the transition from Iron Age I to Iron Age II, while Model C3 indicates a somewhat later date of 948–919 BCE (compare the date 992–961 BCE calculated at Tel Rehov for the same transition). In our Model D, we calculated this transition date at Megiddo as taking place between 967–943 BCE. Finally, we calculated the range of dates of major destruction levels marking the end of the Iron Age I, with the following results: Megiddo VIA: 1010–943 BCE; Yoqne'am XVII: 1045–997 BCE; Tell Qasile X: 1039–979 BCE; Tel Hadar: 1043–979 BCE (all in the 68.2% probability range). Figure 4 indicates that the transition between Iron I and II probably occurred between these above-mentioned destruction events and the dates achieved in our Models C2 or C3, namely during the first half of the 10th century BCE.This study emphasizes the sensitivity of Bayesian models to outliers, and for reducing or adding dates from the models. This sensitivity should be taken into account when using Bayesian models for interpreting radiometric dates in relation to subtle chronological questions in historical periods.

scholarly journals The Iron Age I–II Transition in the Northern Levant: An Emerging Consensus?

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 325-351
Author(s):  
Timothy Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Iron Age ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Local History ◽  
Iron Age Ii ◽  
Iron Age I ◽  
Tell Tayinat ◽  
Southeast Anatolia

The development of a refined, and widely accepted, chronological and cultural sequence has eluded the study of the Iron Age Northern Levant, despite more than a century of archaeological exploration and research. The renewed investigations at Tell Tayinat (ancient Kunulua), capital of the Neo-Hittite Kingdom of Palastin/Walastin and scene of large-scale excavations by the Syrian-Hittite Expedition in the 1930s, have resulted in a tightly constructed stratigraphic and chronological cultural sequence, or “local history,” for this period. This refined “Amuq Sequence” indicates a number of culturally and historically significant transitions, including the transition from the Iron Age I to the Iron Age II, ca. 900 BCE, and it offers the prospect of forging a consensus regarding the cultural and chronological periodization of the broader Iron Age Northern Levant and Southeast Anatolia.

scholarly journals The case for proto-Dvāravatī: A review of the art historical and archaeological evidence

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Iron Age ◽  
Fifth Century ◽  
Archaeological Evidence ◽  
Strong Case ◽  
The Past ◽  
Art Historians ◽  
Iron Age I ◽  
First Millennium ◽  
Western Language

The mid-first millennium CE represents a crucial period in the emergence of early polities in Southeast Asia. However, disagreement remains between archaeologists and art historians as to the precise dating of this shift from prehistory to history. This article focuses on the Dvāravatī period and re-evaluates evidence in Thai and Western language publications. A growing number of sites excavated over the past two decades in particular show occupation from c. the fourth to fifth century onwards while others provide a continual sequence stretching back well into the Iron Age. I argue that evidence from these sites makes a strong case for postulating a proto-Dvāravatī period spanning c. the fourth to fifth centuries. In doing so this article proposes this period as the timeframe within which the nascent traits and characteristics of what becomes Dvāravatī in the seventh to ninth centuries are present and gradually developing.

scholarly journals The Archaeology of Cult of Ancient Israel’s Southern Neighbors and the Midianite-Kenite Hypothesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Manuel Tebes
Keyword(s):  
Iron Age ◽  
Religious Practices ◽  
Early Iron Age ◽  
Arid Areas ◽  
Focus Attention ◽  
Archaeological Evidence ◽  
Biblical Scholarship ◽  
Iron Age I ◽  
History Of

The Midianite-Kenite hypothesis, the idea that the pre-Israelite roots of Yahwism can be traced back to the areas south and southeast of Palestine, has a long pedigree in biblical scholarship. Analyses supporting this view generally agree in three main points. First, they assume that the influence of the southern cultic practices on Yahwism occurred during a restricted period of time, traditionally dated to the Early Iron Age. Second, they see the origins of Yahwism through the lenses of diffusionist perspectives, characterizing this process as a movement or migration of one or a few determined groups to Canaan. And third, adequate analyses of the archaeological evidence of the arid areas to the south of Palestine are few. In this article I will turn the interpretation of the epigraphic and archaeological evidence upside down. Instead of looking to the (mostly biblical) evidence on the origins of the cult of Yahweh and assuming its genesis lies in movements of people from the southern regions to Canaan in the Early Iron Age, I will focus attention on the history of the cultic practices in the Negev, southern Transjordan, and northern Hejaz during the entire Iron Age, and how this information is related to the religious practices known in Judah and Israel during the biblical period, shedding new light on the prehistory of the cult of Yahweh. I will evaluate the evidence not as a single, exceptional event, but as a long-term process within the several-millennia history of cultic practices and beliefs of the local peoples.

scholarly journals The “United Monarchy” on the Ground: The Disruptive Character of the Iron Age I–II Transition and the Nature of Political Transformations

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 15-67
Author(s):  
Avraham Faust
Keyword(s):  
State Formation ◽  
Iron Age ◽  
Settlement Patterns ◽  
Social Complexity ◽  
Formation Processes ◽  
Iron Age Ii ◽  
Political Transformations ◽  
United Monarchy ◽  
Iron Age I ◽  
The Common

It is commonly agreed that the Iron Age I–II transition was gradual and that processes of social complexity initiated in the Iron Age I simply matured in the Iron Age II. The emergence of Levantine kingdoms – whether the so-called “United Monarchy” (i.e., the highland polity) or other polities – was therefore seen as an outcome of this gradual maturation, even if the date of their emergence is hotly debated. The present paper challenges both the perceived gradual nature of Iron Age complexity and the dated understanding of state formation processes that lies behind the common scholarly reconstructions of Iron Age political developments. Instead, the paper shows that the Iron Age I–II transition was troubled and was accompanied by drastic changes in many parameters, whether settlement patterns, settlement forms, or various material traits. Acknowledging these transformations is therefore the first step in understanding the process through which local kingdoms emerged.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document