scholarly journals High-Protein or Low Glycemic Index Diet—Which Energy-Restricted Diet Is Better to Start a Weight Loss Program?

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1086
Author(s):  
Ewa Waliłko ◽  
Małgorzata Napierała ◽  
Marta Bryśkiewicz ◽  
Aneta Fronczyk ◽  
Liliana Majkowska

Background: To date, no crossover studies have compared the effects of high-protein (HP) and low glycemic index (LGI) diets applied as starting energy-restricted diets. Methods: Thirty-five overweight or obese volunteers with sedentary lifestyles aged 41.4 ± 11.0 years, with body mass index (BMI) of 33.6 ± 4.2 kg/m2, without diabetes, completed an 8-week randomized crossover study of an energy-restricted diet (reduction of 30%; approximately 600 kcal/day). The anthropometric parameters, body composition, 24 h blood pressure, and basic metabolic profile were measured at baseline and after completing the two 4-week diets; i.e., the HP (protein at 30% of the daily energy intake) or LGI diet, followed by the opposite diet. All subjects maintained food diaries and attended six counselling sessions with a clinical dietitian. Results: The final weight loss was not significantly different when the HP diet was used first but was associated with a greater loss of fat mass: 4.6 kg (5.8; 3.0 kg) vs. 2.2 (4.5; 0.8); p < 0.025, preserved muscle mass, and reduced LDL-cholesterol. Conclusions: A short-term HP diet applied as a jump-start diet appeared to be more beneficial than an LGI diet, as indicated by the greater fat mass loss, preservation of muscle mass, and better effects on the lipid profile.

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 802-807
Author(s):  
Michele Sculati ◽  
Filippo Rossi ◽  
Mauro Morlacchini ◽  
Hellas Cena ◽  
Carla Roggi

2010 ◽  
Vol 140 (10) ◽  
pp. 1815-1823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Mitsuhashi ◽  
Daisuke Nagaoka ◽  
Katsumi Ishioka ◽  
Karen E. Bigley ◽  
Masayuki Okawa ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 822-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bouche ◽  
S. W. Rizkalla ◽  
J. Luo ◽  
H. Vidal ◽  
A. Veronese ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (02) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
R. Kanchana ◽  
Sancia Vaz ◽  
Divya Reddy ◽  
Abigail Antao ◽  
Trusha Shirodkar ◽  
...  

Menopause ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Thaís R. Silva ◽  
Suzana C. Lago ◽  
Andressa Yavorivski ◽  
Laís L. Ferreira ◽  
Tayane M. Fighera ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-516
Author(s):  
Nina Rica Wium Geiker ◽  
Louise L. Toennesen ◽  
Arne Astrup ◽  
Vibeke Backer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 5830
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Banach ◽  
Paweł Glibowski ◽  
Paulina Jedut

Previous studies using probiotics have shown strain-dependent effects on body mass index (BMI), body mass, or fat mass (FM). The aim of this study was to evaluate how the addition of yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 strains to a diet plan affects selected anthropometric parameters in obese people on an energy-restricted diet. Fifty-four subjects aged 20–49 (34.52 ± 9.58) years were included in this study. The recruited subjects were assigned to two subgroups: consuming probiotic yogurt along with a hypocaloric diet (GP) (n–27) or the same diet but without an intentional introduction of yogurt (GRD) (n–27) for 12 weeks. Both GP and GRD decreased body weight, BMI, fat mass and visceral fat by 5.59 kg and 4.71 kg, 1.89 and 1.61 kg/m2, 4.80 kg and 4.07 kg, and 0.68 and 0.65 L, respectively, although the obtained differences were not significant. Analysis of GP and GRD results separately at the beginning and end of the intervention showed that fat loss was substantial in both groups (p < 0.05). Consumption of yogurt containing LA-5 and BB-12 does not significantly improve anthropometric parameters in obese patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document