scholarly journals Antidepressants and Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Narut Prasitlumkum ◽  
Wisit Cheungpasitporn ◽  
Nithi Tokavanich ◽  
Kimberly R. Ding ◽  
Jakrin Kewcharoen ◽  
...  

Background: Antidepressants are one of the most prescribed medications, particularly for patients with mental disorders. Nevertheless, there are still limited data regarding the risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) associated with these medications. Thus, we performed systemic review and meta-analysis to characterize the risks of VA and SCD among patients who used common antidepressants. Methods: A literature search for studies that reported risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in antidepressant use from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database from inception through September 2020. A random-effects model network meta-analysis model was used to analyze the relation between antidepressants and VA/SCD. Surface Under Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) was used to rank the treatment for each outcome. Results: The mean study sample size was 355,158 subjects. Tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) patients were the least likely to develop ventricular arrhythmia events/sudden cardiac deaths at OR 0.24, 0.028–1.2, OR 0.32 (95% CI 0.038–1.6) for serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), and OR 0.36 (95% CI 0.043, 1.8) for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), respectively. According to SUCRA analysis, TCA was on a higher rank compared to SNRI and SSRI considering the risk of VA/SCD. Conclusion: Our network meta-analysis demonstrated the low risk of VA/SCD among patients using antidepressants for SNRI, SSRI and especially, TCA. Despite the relatively lowest VA/SCD in TCA, drug efficacy and other adverse effects should be taken into account in patients with mental disorders.

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S352
Author(s):  
Mohammad Bashashati ◽  
Irene Sarosiek ◽  
Sharareh Moraveji ◽  
Alok Dwivedi ◽  
Tariq Siddiqui ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 459
Author(s):  
Pattara Rattanawong ◽  
Jakrin Kewcharoen ◽  
Chanavuth Kanitsoraphan ◽  
Timothy Barry ◽  
Anusha Shanbhag ◽  
...  

EP Europace ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 969-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Rosengarten ◽  
P. A. Scott ◽  
J. M. Morgan

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
L. Douglas Smith ◽  
Sarah Gast ◽  
Danielle F. Guy

Background Brugada syndrome is a genetic disorder of cardiac conduction that predisposes patients to spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Although Brugada syndrome is one of the most common causes of sudden cardiac death, patients presenting with the syndrome often go misdiagnosed. This error has potentially fatal consequences for patients, who are at risk for sudden cardiac death without appropriate management. Objective To increase the critical care professional’s knowledge of Brugada syndrome through detailed description of the characteristic electrocardiographic findings, an algorithmic approach to electrocardiogram evaluation, and a case report of a patient with a previously missed diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. The essential concepts of epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, risk stratification, and management are reviewed for critical care professionals who may encounter patients with the syndrome. Diagnosis Patients typically present with syncope or cardiac arrest and an abnormal electrocardiographic finding of ST-segment elevation in the precordial leads. The diagnosis of Brugada syndrome centers on identification of its electrocardiographic characteristics by critical care professionals who routinely evaluate electrocardiograms. Critical care professionals, especially nurses and advanced practice nurses, should be proficient in recognizing the electrocardiographic appearance of Brugada syndrome and initiating appropriate management. Interventions Management strategies include prevention of sudden cardiac death through lifestyle modification and placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Critical care professionals should be aware of commonly used medications that may exacerbate ventricular arrhythmia and place patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. Conclusion Increased awareness of Brugada syndrome among critical care professionals can decrease patient morbidity and mortality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. S186 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Agbaedeng ◽  
R. Mahajan ◽  
D. Munawar ◽  
A. Elliott ◽  
D. Twomey ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 443-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Pan ◽  
Makoto Hibino ◽  
Elsa Kobeissi ◽  
Dagfinn Aune

AbstractCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, while sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for over 60% of all cardiovascular deaths. Elevated blood pressure and hypertension have been associated with increased risk of SCD, but the findings have not been consistent. To clarify whether blood pressure or hypertension is associated with increased risk of SCD and to quantify the size and the shape of any association observed. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for published prospective studies on blood pressure or hypertension and SCD up to 30 April 2018. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. The meta-analysis included 2939 SCDs among 418,235 participants from 18 studies. The summary RRs were 2.10 (95% CI 1.71–2.58, I2 = 56.7%, pheterogeneity = 0.018, n = 10) for prevalent hypertension, 1.28 (95% CI 1.19–1.38, I2 = 45.5%, pheterogeneity = 0.07, n = 10) per 20 mmHg increment in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 1.09 (95% CI 0.83–1.44, I2 = 83.4%, pheterogeneity = 0.002, n = 3) per 10 mmHg increment in diastolic blood pressure (DBP). A nonlinear relationship was suggested between SBP and SCD. The results persisted in most subgroup and sensitivity analyses. There was no evidence of publication bias. This meta-analysis found an increased risk of SCD with hypertension diagnosis and increasing SBP. Future studies should clarify the association for DBP and the shape of the dose–response relationship between blood pressure and SCD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document