scholarly journals Impact of Drug-Gene-Interaction, Drug-Drug-Interaction, and Drug-Drug-Gene-Interaction on (es)Citalopram Therapy: The PharmLines Initiative

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 256
Author(s):  
Muh. Akbar Bahar ◽  
Pauline Lanting ◽  
Jens H. J. Bos ◽  
Rolf H. Sijmons ◽  
Eelko Hak ◽  
...  

We explored the association between CYP2C19/3A4 mediated drug-gene-interaction (DGI), drug-drug-interaction (DDI) and drug-drug-gene-interaction (DDGI) and (es)citalopram dispensing course. A cohort study was conducted among adult Caucasians from the Lifelines cohort (167,729 participants) and linked dispensing data from the IADB.nl database as part of the PharmLines Initiative. Exposure groups were categorized into (es)citalopram starters with DGI, DDI and DDGI. The primary outcome was drug switching and/or dose adjustment, and the secondary was early discontinuation after the start of (es)citalopram. Logistic regression modeling was applied to estimate adjusted odd ratios with their confidence interval. We identified 316 (es)citalopram starters with complete CYP2C19/3A4 genetic information. The CYP2C19 IM/PM and CYP3A4 NM combination increased risks of switching and/or dose reduction (OR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.03–7.29). The higher effect size was achieved by the CYP2C19 IM/PM and CYP3A4 IM combination (OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 1.22–15.69). CYP2C19/3A4 mediated DDIs and DDGIs showed trends towards increased risks of switching and/or dose reduction. In conclusion, a DGI involving predicted decreased CYP2C19 function increases the need for (es)citalopram switching and/or dose reduction which might be enhanced by co-presence of predicted decreased CYP3A4 function. For DDI and DDGI, no conclusions can be drawn from the results.

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 781-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej J. Zamek-Gliszczynski ◽  
Xiaoyan Chu ◽  
Jack A. Cook ◽  
Joseph M. Custodio ◽  
Aleksandra Galetin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Tagwerker ◽  
Mary Jane Carias-Marines ◽  
David J. Smith

Current deficits in effectively utilizing PGx testing in clinical practice include limited awareness and training of healthcare professionals, routine ordering of assays investigating up to 5 genes and lack of concise reporting of dosing guidelines and drug-drug-interactions. A novel deep sequencing (>1000X) PGx panel is described encompassing 23 genes and 141 SNPs or indels combined with PGx dosing guidance, drug-gene-interaction (DGI) and drug-drug-interaction (DDI) reporting to prevent adverse drug reaction events. During a 2-year period, patients (n = 171) were monitored in a pain management clinic. Urine toxicology, PGx reports, and progress notes were studied retrospectively for changes in prescription regimens before and after the PGx report was made available to the provider. Among patient PGx reports with medication lists provided (n = 146) 57.5% showed one or more moderate and 5.5% at least one serious pharmacogenetic interaction. 66% of patients showed at least one moderate and 15% one or more serious drug-gene or drug-drug-interaction. A significant number of active changes in prescriptions based on the PGx reports provided was observed for 85 patients (83%) for which a specific drug was either discontinued, switched within the defined drug classes of the report or a new drug added. Preventative action was observed for all serious interactions and only moderate interactions were tolerated for lack of other alternatives. This study demonstrates a successful implementation of PGx testing utilizing an extended PGx panel combined with a customized, informational report to help improve clinical outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley D. Kufel ◽  
Paul M. Armistead ◽  
Lindsay M. Daniels ◽  
Jonathan R. Ptachcinski ◽  
Maurice D. Alexander ◽  
...  

A paucity of data currently exists regarding drug–drug interaction (DDI) with tacrolimus and isavuconazole coadministration. Current literature provides conflicting recommendations on whether an empiric tacrolimus dose reduction is necessary when coadministered with isavuconazole. A 47-year-old African American female with acute lymphoblastic leukemia underwent an allogenic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) and was subsequently placed on routine posttransplant therapy including tacrolimus for immunosuppression and posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis. Tacrolimus was empirically dose reduced due to the expected DDI with posaconazole based on current recommendations. Due to a persistently prolonged QTc interval and need for mold coverage, antifungal prophylaxis was ultimately changed to isavuconazole at standard recommended dosing. Tacrolimus was empirically dose reduced by 40% based on limited available literature at the time; however, tacrolimus trough concentrations subsequently declined, requiring an increase in tacrolimus dose to maintain therapeutic trough concentrations. Adequate isavuconazole absorption was documented through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data by measuring an isavuconazole trough concentration and directly observing isavuconazole’s shortening effect on the QTc interval, respectively. Our experience in an alloSCT patient suggests that an empiric tacrolimus dose reduction is not required when isavuconazole is initiated, but close tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring should rather be performed to guide tacrolimus dosing.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4791-4791
Author(s):  
Jianping Zhang ◽  
Connie L. Erickson-Miller ◽  
Geoffrey Chan ◽  
Yan Yan Zhou

Abstract Background: Eltrombopag, an orally bioavailable thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is approved for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (adults and children), hepatitis C virus-related thrombocytopenia, in multiple countries. In the US, eltrombopag is also approved for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) in patients with insufficient response to immunosuppressive therapy. In SAA, patients frequently take cyclosporine (CsA), concurrently with eltrombopag. Eltrombopag is a substrate of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and CsA is reported to be an inhibitor of this transporter. To assess this BCRP interaction further, the effect of CsA on plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of eltrombopag was assessed in a clinical drug-drug interaction study in healthy human subjects. Methods: In a phase 1, open-label, randomized, three-period crossover study, healthy subjects were randomized to one of the three treatment sequences: (D0, D1, D2), (D1, D0, D2), or (D1, D2, D0), where D0 = 50 mg eltrombopag, D1 = 50 mg eltrombopag + 200 mg CsA, and D2 = 50 mg eltrombopag + 600 mg CsA. Eltrombopag was administered on the first day of each treatment period. On Day -1 of each treatment period, subjects checked into the clinical research unit, where they remained until the 72-hour PK blood draw on Day 4. After a 3- to 10-day washout period, they returned for Day 1 of the next treatment period. The total duration of a subject's participation in the study from screening to final discharge was approximately 6 weeks (assuming 3-day washouts between treatment periods). Safety and PK were analyzed during each period. Results: Thirty-nine healthy subjects were randomized to receive treatment (13 subjects per treatment sequence); 28 (72%) were men and 11 (28%) were women. All 39 subjects completed the study; all subjects were included in the PK and safety analyses. In general, the plasma eltrombopag PK profiles were consistent across the three treatment arms and consistent with that previously reported for eltrombopag in healthy adult subjects (see Figure). Plasma eltrombopag PK parameters and their statistical comparisons are shown in the Table below. On average, eltrombopag AUC(0-inf) and Cmax decreased by 18% and 25%, respectively, when coadministered with 200 mg CsA and decreased by 24% and 39% when coadministered with 600 mg CsA. Median time to Cmax (tmax) of eltrombopag increased from 3 hours to 4 hours in the presence of 200 mg and 600 mg CsA. The most common adverse events (AE) were hot feeling (62%), headache (36%), and nausea (18%). Except for one subject who had a Grade 2 headache, all AEs reported during the study were Grade 1 events. No clinically significant abnormal electrocardiograms were reported. There were no severe adverse events in this study. Conclusions: Given that the eltrombopag dose adjustment is permitted during the course of treatment for achieving the target platelet count, the decrease in exposure following co-administration of 200 mg or 600 mg CsA was not considered clinically meaningful, and therefore no starting dose adjustment is recommended when eltrombopag is co-administered with CsA. Funding: This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline; eltrombopag is an asset of Novartis AG as of March 2, 2015. Disclosures Zhang: Parexel: Employment. Erickson-Miller:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Patents but no royalties. Chan:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Zhou:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document