scholarly journals SBAS/EGNOS for Maritime

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 764
Author(s):  
Manuel Lopez-Martinez ◽  
José-Manuel Álvarez ◽  
José-Maria Lorenzo ◽  
Carlos Garcia Daroca
Keyword(s):  
Global Positioning System ◽  
Service Provision ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
User Communities ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Primary Means ◽  
Augmentation Techniques ◽  
Maritime Navigation ◽  
Gnss Receivers ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) has become the primary means of obtaining Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) information at sea. The current capabilities of the Global Positioning System (GPS) constellation, although adequate for ocean navigation, have some shortfalls for coastal navigation: some user communities have a need for enhanced performance and they can benefit from the available “augmentation” techniques, resulting in improved GPS performance. Nowadays, the users can take advantage of Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBASs). The maritime domain has been used SBAS for several years and it is supported by GNSS receivers used in the recreational and professional sectors. The SBAS/European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) can be used to complement the differential GNSS (DGNSS) for the provision of enhanced accuracy and integrity information with additional benefits. There are different possible solutions for the transmission of SBAS/EGNOS information to maritime users, considering that the corrections can be available from different transmission means. The different options for the use of SBAS for maritime navigation, the benefits brought to mariners, as well as the associated regulations, standardization and service provision aspects, are presented in this article.

scholarly journals Method of Evaluating the Positioning System Capability for Complying with the Minimum Accuracy Requirements for the International Hydrographic Organization Orders

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (18) ◽  
pp. 3860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Specht
Keyword(s):  
Global Positioning System ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Positioning System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Positioning Systems ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Gnss Receivers ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Alternative Solutions

According to the IHO (International Hydrographic Organization) S-44 standard, hydrographic surveys can be carried out in four categories, the so-called orders—special, 1a, 1b, and 2—for which minimum accuracy requirements for the applied positioning system have been set out. These amount to, respectively: 2 m, 5 m, 5 m, and 20 m at a confidence level of 0.95. It is widely assumed that GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) network solutions with an accuracy of 2–5 cm (p = 0.95) and maritime DGPS (Differential Global Positioning System) systems with an error of 1–2 m (p = 0.95) are currently the two main positioning methods in hydrography. Other positioning systems whose positioning accuracy increases from year to year (and which may serve as alternative solutions) have been omitted. The article proposes a method that enables an assessment of any given navigation positioning system in terms of its compliance (or non-compliance) with the minimum accuracy requirements specified for hydrographic surveys. The method concerned clearly assesses whether a particular positioning system meets the accuracy requirements set out for a particular IHO order. The model was verified, taking into account both past and present research results (stationary and dynamic) derived from tests on the following systems: DGPS, EGNOS (European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service), and multi-GNSS receivers (GPS/GLONASS/BDS/Galileo). The study confirmed that the DGPS system meets the requirements for all IHO orders and proved that the EGNOS system can currently be applied in measurements in the orders 1a, 1b, and 2. On the other hand, multi-GNSS receivers meet the requirements for order 2, while some of them meet the requirements for orders 1a and 1b as well.

scholarly journals Operation of geodetic GNSS instruments under chirp signal L1 jamming

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (02) ◽  
pp. 189-204
Author(s):  
Franc Dimc ◽  
Polona Pavlovčič Prešeren ◽  
Matej Bažec
Keyword(s):  
Global Positioning System ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Signal Interference ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Gnss Receivers ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
To Receive

This paper presents the results of a vulnerability test of several geodetic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers in case of intentional signal interference in the frequency L1 for GPS (Global Positioning System). Nine instruments from different manufacturers (i.e., Leica Geosystems AG, Trimble Inc., Javad GNSS) were tested. The test was based on static and kinematic jamming. A static scenario with three-minute interruptions was followed by experiments with a stationary jammer located at distances from 10 m to 160 m from the receivers. For short-term kinematic interference, the jammer was installed in the vehicle, which passed the GNSS instruments at different speeds. An analysis of different scenarios showed that the jammer interrupted GPS but not GLONASS signals in certain situations. Since Galileo was not nominally operational at the time of the July 2019 measurements, only GPS and GLONASS were eligible for the study. The geodetic GNSS instruments reacted to the interruptions with a decreased signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and either with a complete inability to determine the code/phase position or with an incorrect calculation of phase ambiguities (initialization), which also affected the quality of the positioning. The proximity of the jammer played the most significant role in the complete inability to receive the signal; however, for the incorrect positioning longer duration of jamming was also a reason.

scholarly journals Performance Assessment of PPP Surveys with Open Source Software Using the GNSS GPS–GLONASS–Galileo Constellations

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 5420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Angrisano ◽  
Gino Dardanelli ◽  
Anna Innac ◽  
Alessandro Pisciotta ◽  
Claudia Pipitone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Global Positioning System ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Static Mode ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Significant Performance ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

In this work, the performance of the multi-GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technique, in static mode, is analyzed. Specifically, GPS (Global Positioning System), GLONASS, and Galileo systems are considered, and quantifying the Galileo contribution is one of the main objectives. The open source software RTKLib is adopted to process the data, with precise satellite orbits and clocks from CNES (Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales) and CLS (Collecte Localisation Satellites) analysis centers for International GNSS Service (IGS). The Iono-free model is used to correct ionospheric errors, the GOT-4.7 model is used to correct tidal effects, and Differential Code Biases (DCB) are taken from the Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Luftund Raumfahrt (DLR) center. Two different tropospheric models are tested: Saastamoinen and Estimate ZTD (Zenith Troposhperic Delay). For the proposed study, a dataset of 31 days from a permanent GNSS station, placed in Palermo (Italy), and a dataset of 10 days from a static geodetic receiver, placed nearby the station, have been collected and processed by the most used open source software in the geomatic community. The considered GNSS configurations are seven: GPS only, GLONASS only, Galileo only, GPS+GLONASS, GPS+Galileo, GLONASS+Galileo, and GPS+GLONASS+Galileo. The results show significant performance improvement of the GNSS combinations with respect to single GNSS cases.

scholarly journals Covariance Analysis of Real-Time Precise GPS Orbit Estimated from Double-Differenced Carrier Phase Observations

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 2271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunkyoung Yu ◽  
Donguk Kim ◽  
Junesol Song ◽  
Changdon Kee
Keyword(s):  
Fault Detection ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Global Positioning System ◽  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Additional Parameter ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Correlation Information ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Orbit Errors

The covariance of real-time global positioning system (GPS) orbits has been drawing attention in various fields such as user integrity, navigation performance improvement, and fault detection. The international global navigation satellite system (GNSS) service (IGS) provides real-time orbit standard deviations without correlations between the axes. However, without correlation information, the provided covariance cannot assure the performance of the orbit product, which would, in turn, causes significant problems in fault detection and user integrity. Therefore, we studied real-time GPS orbit covariance characteristics along various coordinates to effectively provide conservative covariance. To this end, the covariance and precise orbits are estimated by means of an extended Kalman filter using double-differenced carrier phase observations of 61 IGS reference stations. Furthermore, we propose a new method for providing covariance to minimize loss of correlation. The method adopted by the IGS, which neglects correlation, requires 4.5 times the size of the covariance to bind orbit errors. By comparison, our proposed method reduces this size from 4.5 to 1.3 using only one additional parameter. In conclusion, the proposed method effectively provides covariance to users.

Urban Fleet Monitoring with GPS and GLONASS

1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tsakiri ◽  
M. Stewart ◽  
T. Forward ◽  
D. Sandison ◽  
J. Walker
Keyword(s):  
Global Positioning System ◽  
Public Transport ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Dead Reckoning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Basic Function ◽  
Positioning System ◽  
Positioning Systems ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The increasing volume of traffic in urban areas has resulted in steady growth of the mean driving time on fixed routes. Longer driving times lead to significantly higher transportation costs, particularly for vehicle fleets, where efficiency in the distribution of their transport tasks is important in staying competitive in the market. For bus fleets, the optimal control and command of the vehicles is, as well as the economic requirements, a basic function of their general mission. The Global Positioning System (GPS) allows reliable and accurate positioning of public transport vehicles except within the physical limitations imposed by built-up city ‘urban canyons’. With a view to the next generation of satellite positioning systems for public transport fleet management, this paper highlights the limitations imposed on current GPS systems operating in the urban canyon. The capabilities of a future positioning system operating in this type of environment are discussed. It is suggested that such a system could comprise receivers capable of integrating the Global Positioning System (GPS) and the Russian equivalent, the Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS), and relatively cheap dead-reckoning sensors.

Accounting for Inter-System Bias in DGNSS Positioning with GPS/GLONASS/BDS/Galileo

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 686-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Liu ◽  
Bao Shu ◽  
Longwei Xu ◽  
Chuang Qian ◽  
Rufei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Positioning System ◽  
Simple Algorithm ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Harsh Environments ◽  
Positioning System ◽  
Gnss Positioning ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
System Bias ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Reliability And Availability

Code Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) is widely used in satellite navigation and positioning because of its simple algorithm and preferable precision. Multi-Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) is expected to enhance the accuracy, reliability and availability of Differential GNSS (DGNSS) positioning. Traditional DGNSS models should set separate clock parameters due to the clock differences between the different systems. Awareness of the Inter-System Bias (ISB) could help to maximise the redundancy of the positioning model, thus improving the performance of multi-GNSS positioning. This paper aims to examine the inter-system bias of GPS/GLONASS/BeiDou (BDS)/Galileo and their benefits in DGNSS positioning. Results show that Differential ISB (DISB) characteristics vary with different receiver types and systems. The size of DISB could reach metre-level and the precision of estimated DISBs can reach approximately several centimetres within tens of epochs. Therefore, a new real-time DGNSS model that accounts for ISB is proposed. After differential ISBs are initialised, positioning with four satellites from arbitrarily the same or different systems can be realised. Moreover, compared with the traditional DGNSS model, the precision of the positioning results with the new model are obviously improved, especially in harsh environments.

scholarly journals Estimating ocean tide loading displacements with GPS and GLONASS

Solid Earth ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1849-1863
Author(s):  
Bogdan Matviichuk ◽  
Matt King ◽  
Christopher Watson
Keyword(s):  
Global Positioning System ◽  
Western Europe ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Ocean Tide ◽  
Ground Displacement ◽  
Ocean Tide Loading ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Tidal Constituents ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

Abstract. Ground displacements due to ocean tide loading have previously been successfully observed using Global Positioning System (GPS) data, and such estimates for the principal lunar M2 constituent have been used to infer the rheology and structure of the asthenosphere. The GPS orbital repeat period is close to that of several other major tidal constituents (K1, K2, S2); thus, GPS estimates of ground displacement at these frequencies are subject to GPS systematic errors. We assess the addition of GLONASS (GLObal NAvigation Satellite System) to increase the accuracy and reliability of eight major ocean tide loading constituents: four semi-diurnal (M2, S2, N2, K2) and four diurnal constituents (K1, O1, P1, Q1). We revisit a previous GPS study, focusing on 21 sites in the UK and western Europe, expanding it with an assessment of GLONASS and GPS+GLONASS estimates. In the region, both GPS and GLONASS data have been abundant since 2010.0. We therefore focus on the period 2010.0–2014.0, a span considered long enough to reliably estimate the major constituents. Data were processed with a kinematic precise point positioning (PPP) strategy to produce site coordinate time series for each of three different modes: GPS, GLONASS and GPS+GLONASS. The GPS solution with ambiguities resolved was used as a baseline for performance assessment of the additional modes. GPS+GLONASS shows very close agreement with ambiguity resolved GPS for lunar constituents (M2, N2, O1, Q1) but with substantial differences for solar-related constituents (S2, K2, K1, P1), with solutions including GLONASS being generally closer to model estimates. While no single constellation mode performs best for all constituents and components, we propose to use a combination of constellation modes to recover tidal parameters: GPS+GLONASS for most constituents, except for K2 and K1 where GLONASS (north and up) and GPS with ambiguities resolved (east) perform best.

scholarly journals Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Different Types of Jamming Signals on Commercial GNSS Receivers

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haidy Elghamrawy ◽  
Malek Karaim ◽  
Mohamed Tamazin ◽  
Aboelmaged Noureldin
Keyword(s):  
Satellite System ◽  
Signal Interference ◽  
Interference Signal ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Wideband Signals ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
Gnss Receivers ◽  
Propagation Medium ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
The Impact

The received global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signal has a very low power due to traveling a very long distance and to the nature of the signal’s propagation medium. Thus, GNSS signals are easily susceptible to signal interference. Signal interference can cause severe degradation or interruption in GNSS position, navigation, and timing (PNT) services which could be very critical, especially in safety-critical applications. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the impact of the presence of jamming signals on a high-end GNSS receiver and investigate the benefits of using a multi-constellation system under such circumstances. Several jamming signals are considered in this research, including narrowband and wideband signals that are located on GPS L1 or GLONASS L1 frequency bands. Quasi-real dynamic trajectories are generated using the Spirent™ GSS6700 GNSS signal simulator combined with an interference signal generator through a Spirent™ GSS8366 unit. The performance evaluation was carried out using several evaluation metrics, including signal power degradation, navigation solution availability, dilution of precision (DOP), and positioning accuracy. The multi-constellation system presented better performance over the global positioning system (GPS)-only constellation in most cases. Moreover, jamming the GPS band caused more critical effects than jamming the GLONASS band.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document