scholarly journals A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Bill I. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Randomized Controlled

We would like to thank Dr [...]

scholarly journals Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis. Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial”

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Jackson Peos ◽  
Andrew W. Brown ◽  
Colby J. Vorland ◽  
David B. Allison ◽  
Amanda Sainsbury
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Continuous Energy ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Campbell and colleagues recently published a randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of diets involving intermittent energy restriction versus continuous energy restriction on changes in body composition and resting metabolic rate (RMR) in resistance-trained adults[...]

scholarly journals Correction to: The effect of moderate intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on body composition and resting metabolic rate in resistance-trained females: A randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Madelin R. Siedler ◽  
Eric T. Trexler ◽  
Megan N. Humphries ◽  
Priscila Lamadrid ◽  
Brian Waddell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Resting Metabolic Rate ◽  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Continuous Energy

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Growth and Fat-Free Mass Gain in Preterm Infants After Discharge: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. e1215-e1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Roggero ◽  
M. L. Gianni ◽  
O. Amato ◽  
N. Liotto ◽  
L. Morlacchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Mass Gain ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Rationale and Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Fast versus Slow Weight Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Obesity—The TEMPO Diet Trial

Healthcare ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radhika Seimon ◽  
Alice Gibson ◽  
Claudia Harper ◽  
Shelley Keating ◽  
Nathan Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Cardiometabolic Health ◽  
Meal Replacement ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Eating Disorder Behaviors

Very low energy diets (VLEDs), commonly achieved by replacing all food with meal replacement products and which result in fast weight loss, are the most effective dietary obesity treatment available. VLEDs are also cheaper to administer than conventional, food-based diets, which result in slow weight loss. Despite being effective and affordable, these diets are underutilized by healthcare professionals, possibly due to concerns about potential adverse effects on body composition and eating disorder behaviors. This paper describes the rationale and detailed protocol for the TEMPO Diet Trial (Type of Energy Manipulation for Promoting optimal metabolic health and body composition in Obesity), in a randomized controlled trial comparing the long-term (3-year) effects of fast versus slow weight loss. One hundred and one post-menopausal women aged 45–65 years with a body mass index of 30–40 kg/m2 were randomized to either: (1) 16 weeks of fast weight loss, achieved by a total meal replacement diet, followed by slow weight loss (as for the SLOW intervention) for the remaining time up until 52 weeks (“FAST” intervention), or (2) 52 weeks of slow weight loss, achieved by a conventional, food-based diet (“SLOW” intervention). Parameters of body composition, cardiometabolic health, eating disorder behaviors and psychology, and adaptive responses to energy restriction were measured throughout the 3-year trial.

Effects of high‐protein diets on fat‐free mass and muscle protein synthesis following weight loss: a randomized controlled trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 3837-3847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan M. Pasiakos ◽  
Jay J. Cao ◽  
Lee M. Margolis ◽  
Edward R. Sauter ◽  
Leah D. Whigham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Muscle Protein ◽  
Muscle Protein Synthesis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
High Protein Diets ◽  
Protein Diets

scholarly journals Gut Microbiota Is Linked to Physical Health Improvements Resulting from Energy-Restricted Diet and Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Adults

Proceedings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Shakuntla Gondalia ◽  
Matthew Cooke ◽  
Stephen Keenan ◽  
Regina Belski
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Physical Health ◽  
Gut Microbiome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Restricted Diet ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Continuous Energy

Animal studies have demonstrated that energy-restricted diets and exercise affect the gut microbiome and are positively linked to physical health; however, less is known about the impacts of various patterns of dietary restriction combined with exercise on the gut microbiota and associated health outcomes in humans. This study aimed to determine if an energy-restricted diet combined with resistance training altered the gut microbiome, and whether any changes were associated with differences in body composition, dietary intake, or biomarkers of metabolic health. Twenty-six healthy males and females, aged 19–36 years with BMIs of 22–35 kg/m2, were enrolled in a 2-arm parallel, randomized controlled trial and followed either a 5:2 intermittent fasting (IFT, n = 13) or continuous energy restriction (CERT, n = 13) diet combined with supervised resistance training for 12 weeks. Both treatments resulted in decreased body weight and increased lean body mass. Shifts in the abundance of, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a high butyrate producer, was positively associated with changes in lean body mass (IFTp = 0.05, CERTp = 0.01) in both the groups. Moreover, in the CERT group, changes in Coprococcus genus were negatively associated with energy (p = 0.009) and fat intake (p= 0.03) and positively associated with body fat (p = 0.02). Overall, the findings indicate that using resistance training paired with either intermittent or continuous energy restriction, result in similar changes in bacterial diversity and shifts in relative abundance of bacterial taxa. The shift in specific bacterial taxa were positively associated with measures of physical health providing further support to the proposed relationship between energy consumption, exercise, gut microbiota, and physical health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document