scholarly journals Snake-Eye Myelopathy and Surgical Prognosis: Case Series and Systematic Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Maria Fontanella ◽  
Luca Zanin ◽  
Riccardo Bergomi ◽  
Marco Fazio ◽  
Costanza Maria Zattra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Surgical Data ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

The prognostic value of “snake-eyes” sign in spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unclear and the correlation with different pathological conditions has not been completely elucidated. In addition, its influence on surgical outcome has not been investigated in depth. A literature review according to PRISMA (Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols) guidelines on the prognostic significance of “snake-eyes” sign in operated patients was performed. Clinical, neuroradiological, and surgical data of three institutional patients, were also retrospectively collected. The three patients, with radiological evidence of “snake-eyes” myelopathy, underwent appropriate surgical treatment for their condition, with no new post-operative neurological deficits and good outcome at follow-up. The literature review, however, reported conflicting results: the presence of “snake-eyes” sign seems a poor prognostic factor in degenerative cervical myelopathy, even if some cases can improve after surgery. “Snake-eyes” myelopathy represents a rare form of myelopathy; pathophysiology is still unclear. The frequency of this myelopathy may be greater than previously thought and according to our literature review it is mostly a negative prognostic factor. However, from our experience, prognosis might not be so dire, especially when tailored surgical intervention is performed; therefore, surgery should always be considered and based on the complete clinical, neurophysiological, and radiological data.

scholarly journals Prognostic factors for chronic post-surgical pain after lung or pleural surgery: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e051554
Author(s):  
Pascal Richard David Clephas ◽  
Sanne Elisabeth Hoeks ◽  
Marialena Trivella ◽  
Christian S Guay ◽  
Preet Mohinder Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Surgical Pain ◽  
Literature Reviews ◽  
Chronic Post Surgical Pain

IntroductionChronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) after lung or pleural surgery is a common complication and associated with a decrease in quality of life, long-term use of pain medication and substantial economic costs. An abundant number of primary prognostic factor studies are published each year, but findings are often inconsistent, methods heterogeneous and the methodological quality questionable. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are therefore needed to summarise the evidence.Methods and analysisThe reporting of this protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist. We will include retrospective and prospective studies with a follow-up of at least 3 months reporting patient-related factors and surgery-related factors for any adult population. Randomised controlled trials will be included if they report on prognostic factors for CPSP after lung or pleural surgery. We will exclude case series, case reports, literature reviews, studies that do not report results for lung or pleural surgery separately and studies that modified the treatment or prognostic factor based on pain during the observation period. MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, Google Scholar and relevant literature reviews will be searched. Independent pairs of two reviewers will assess studies in two stages based on the PICOTS criteria. We will use the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool for the quality assessment and the CHARMS-PF checklist for the data extraction of the included studies. The analyses will all be conducted separately for each identified prognostic factor. We will analyse adjusted and unadjusted estimated measures separately. When possible, evidence will be summarised with a meta-analysis and otherwise narratively. We will quantify heterogeneity by calculating the Q and I2 statistics. The heterogeneity will be further explored with meta-regression and subgroup analyses based on clinical knowledge. The quality of the evidence obtained will be evaluated according to the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation guideline 28.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will not be necessary, as all data are already in the public domain. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021227888.

TORS for OSA: a practice, pitfalls and literature review

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 488-498
Author(s):  
Amro Hassaan ◽  
Aaron Trinidade ◽  
Bhik Kotecha ◽  
Neil Tolley
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Patient Positioning ◽  
Tongue Base ◽  
Historical Study ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Purpose Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) is increasingly employed in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) management. Objective outcomes are generally assessed through polysomnography. Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be a useful adjunct in objective upper airway assessment, in particular the tongue base, providing useful information for surgical planning and outcome assessment, though care must be taken in patient positioning during surgery. The purpose of this paper is to identify pitfalls in this process and suggest a protocol for pre-operative MRI scanning in OSA. Design/methodology/approach This study is a four-patient prospective case-series and literature review. Outcome measures include pre- and post-operative volumetric changes in the pharynx as measured on MRI and apnoea–hypopnea indices (AHI), with cure being OSA resolution or a 50 per cent reduction in AHI. Findings All patients achieved AHI reduction and/or OSA cure following TORS, despite a decrease in pharyngeal volume measurements at the tongue base level. This study and others lacked standardisation in the MRI scanning protocol, which resulted in an inability to effectively compare pre- and post-operative scans. Pitfalls were related to variation in head/tongue position, soft-tissue marker usage and assessed area boundary limits. Practical implications TORS appears to be effective in OSA management. A new protocol for patient positioning and anatomical landmarks is suggested. Originality/value The findings could provide directly comparable data between scans and may allow correlation between tongue base volumetric changes and AHI through subsequent and historical study meta-analysis.

scholarly journals Tumour-stroma ratio and 5-year mortality in gastric adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niko Kemi ◽  
Maarit Eskuri ◽  
Joonas H. Kauppila
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Tumour Stroma ◽  
Potential Prognostic Factor ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Abstract Tumour-stroma ratio (TSR) is a novel potential prognostic factor in cancers and based on the proportions of stroma and tumour area. The prognostic value of TSR in gastric cancer is incompletely known. The aim of this study was to estimate prognostic significance of TSR in gastric adenocarcinoma. A search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed. A meta-analysis was conducted on five-year survival in gastric cancer patients using inverse variance random-effects methods. The literature search yielded 5329 potential titles, of which a total of seven studies were eligible. Results of six studies including a total of 1779 patients were pooled in the meta-analysis. Only 23 (1.3%) of the patients received neoadjuvant therapy. All six studies had a cut-off of 50% for the proportion of stroma when dividing the patients into low- and high stroma groups. Low TSR (high amount of stroma) was strongly associated with increased five-year mortality (hazard ratio 2.19, 95% CI 1.69–2.85). In conclusion, TSR is a strong prognostic factor in gastric cancer. It could be used to estimate prognosis of gastric cancer patients not receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies including patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy are recommended.

A pooled analysis of 1,546 patients with AIDS-related lymphoma (ARL): An assessment of prognostic factors by treatment era.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8524-8524
Author(s):  
Stefan K. Barta ◽  
Michael Samuel ◽  
Xiaonan Xue ◽  
Jeanette Y. Lee ◽  
Nicolas Mounier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Cd4 Count ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Increased Risk

8524 Background: Management of ARL evolved in the last 2 decades. We previously reported prognostic factors in a pooled analysis of 1,546 patients with ARL, and here present analysis of these factors over time to determine if their prognostic significance has changed. Methods: Following a systematic review, we assembled individual patient data from 19 prospective phase 2/3 clinical trials (published 1993-2010) for ARL (n=1,546). Factors analyzed include age, sex, histology, CD4 count, prior history of (h/o) AIDS, & age-adjusted (aa) IPI. The endpoint was overall survival (OS) expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) for death. We used separate Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for the other covariates to determine the significance of each variable in the following time periods: pre-cART [combination antiretroviral therapy] (<1996; n=388), early cART (‘96-‘00; n=694), modern cART (‘01-‘04; n=282) & current era (‘05-‘10; n=182). We also combined all enrollments in one Cox model to test for difference in association with OS over enrollment periods. Results: Rituximab use was limited in the early cART (20%) compared with the modern cART (83%) and current (93%) eras. Histology & sex were not significantly associated with OS in any time period. Increasing age was associated with worse OS in the pre-cART (HR 1.02; p<0.01) and current (HR 1.05, p=0.04) eras. A prior h/o AIDS increased risk of death during early cART (HR 1.31, p=0.047) but was not significant after 2000. Meanwhile, baseline CD4 count <50 was a poor prognostic factor during early (HR 1.78, p<0.01) and modern cART (HR 2.76, p=0.001) eras, but not in the current era. The aaIPI predicted worse OS in each time period (pre-cART: HR 1.54, p<0.0001; early cART: HR 1.49, p<0.0001; modern cART: HR 1.52, p<0.01; current era: HR 2.34, p<0.0001). No significant interaction between each prognostic factor with enrollment was found. Conclusions: In this pooled analysis of 1,546 patients with ARL, aaIPI was the only consistently significant prognostic factor and its effect was magnified in the current era. HIV-related factors gained prognostic relevance in the early and modern cART era but may not be as relevant with current treatment strategies.

scholarly journals PD-L1 and prognosis in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: a meta-analysis and bioinformatics study

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592096236
Author(s):  
Liu Jin ◽  
Weiling Gu ◽  
Xueqin Li ◽  
Liang Xie ◽  
Linhong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Tcga Dataset

Background: The prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has been controversial according to previous investigations. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the potential prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in MPM. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were thoroughly searched for relevant original articles published before 9 April 2020. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. The results of the meta-analysis were verified using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Results: In total 16 studies were included in our meta-analysis. A high PD-L1 expression was associated with a poor OS (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.28–1.83, p < 0.001), but not a grave PFS (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.82–1.39, p = 0.643) in MPM. Furthermore, the PD-L1 expression correlated with the sarcomatoid + biphasic type of MPM (odds ratio = 4.32, 95% CI = 2.16–8.64, p < 0.001). TCGA data indicated that PD-L1 was a significant prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.069, 95% CI = 1.136–3.769, p = 0.0175), but not for PFS (HR = 1.205, 95% CI = 0.572–2.539, p = 0.624), which was in accordance with the results of the meta-analysis. Conclusion: A high PD-L1 expression is a significant prognostic factor for poor OS of patients with MPM. We therefore suggest that PD-L1 expression levels can be used to predict the clinical outcomes of patients with MPM in the future.

scholarly journals TMPRSS4 as an emerging potential poor prognostic factor for solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (46) ◽  
pp. 76327-76336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Zeng ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Li-Na Zhou ◽  
Min Tang ◽  
Yi-Xin Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor

scholarly journals C-Reactive Protein as a Prognostic Factor for Human Osteosarcoma: A Meta-Analysis and Literature Review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e94632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Hua Yi ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
Zhi-Yong Li ◽  
Jun Hu ◽  
Xiao-Feng Niu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Human Osteosarcoma
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document