scholarly journals Diagnosis, Investigation and Management of Patients with Acute and Chronic Myocardial Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2331
Author(s):  
Caelan Taggart ◽  
Ryan Wereski ◽  
Nicholas L. Mills ◽  
Andrew R. Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Plaque Rupture ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Atherosclerotic Plaque Rupture

The application of high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in clinical practice has led to an increase in the recognition of elevated concentrations in patients without myocardial ischaemia. The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction encourages clinicians to classify such patients as having an acute or chronic myocardial injury based on the presence or absence of a rise or a fall in cardiac troponin concentrations. Both conditions may be caused by a variety of cardiac and non-cardiac conditions, and evidence suggests that clinical outcomes are worse than patients with myocardial infarction due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture, with as few as one-third of patients alive at 5 years. Major adverse cardiovascular events are comparable between populations, and up to three-fold higher than healthy individuals. Despite this, no evidence-based strategies exist to guide clinicians in the investigation of non-ischaemic myocardial injury. This review explores the aetiology of myocardial injury and proposes a simple framework to guide clinicians in early assessment to identify those who may benefit from further investigation and treatment for those with cardiovascular disease.

Abstract 19710: Causes for Increased Cardiac Troponin I Using Gender-Specific 99th Percentiles From a High Sensitivity Assay in a US Population

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yader Sandoval ◽  
Stephen W Smith ◽  
Karen M Schulz ◽  
MaryAnn M Murakami ◽  
Fred S Apple
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Ischemia ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Plaque Rupture ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Gender Specific

Introduction: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have not yet been FDA cleared for clinical use in the United States (US). Pending expected approval of hs-cTn assays, which will use gender-specific cutoffs (GSC), it is relevant to recognize the causes of cTn increases using hs-cTnI assays in a US population. Our purpose was to describe the frequency of distinct etiologies of hs-cTnI assay increases using GSC. Methods: Retrospective study of 310 patients with serial hs-cTnI (Abbott ARCHITECT, 99th percentiles: F:16 ng/L; M:34 ng/L) measurements. Patients with an increased hs-cTnI were adjudicated into categories according to the 3rd Universal Definition of MI. Categories included, A: primary myocardial ischemia (i.e. plaque rupture); B: injury secondary to supply/demand imbalance; C: injury not related to myocardial ischemia (i.e. cardiac contusion, ablation, shock, surgery); D: multifactorial or indeterminate myocardial injury (i.e. heart failure, critically ill, pulmonary HTN, sepsis, stroke, renal failure, pulmonary embolism); E: Unknown. Results: 127 (41%) had an increased hs-cTnI above the GSC 99th percentile, whereas 183 (59%) had a normal hs-cTnI. The most common causes of hs-cTnI increases were: a) multifactorial or indeterminate injury - 43% among all patients and 52% in males, and b) supply/demand imbalance - 39% in women (Table). Injury related to primary myocardial ischemia was present in 10% (n=13). Females had more injury related to supply/demand ischemia than males (39% vs. 18%, p=0.01), whereas males had more multifactorial or indeterminate injury (52% vs. 33%, p=0.05). Conclusions: Most increased hs-cTnI values were explained by non-plaque rupture conditions. Males tended to have hs-cTnI increases due to multifactorial/indeterminate causes, whereas in women supply/demand imbalance was the most common etiology. Investigations are needed to better understand if etiologies of myocardial injury have gender differences.

scholarly journals Troponin elevation pattern and subsequent cardiac and non-cardiac outcomes: Implementing the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction and high-sensitivity troponin at a population level

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248289
Author(s):  
Anthony (Ming-yu) Chuang ◽  
Mau T. Nguyen ◽  
Ehsan Khan ◽  
Dylan Jones ◽  
Matthew Horsfall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmia ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cardiac Outcomes ◽  
High Sensitivity Troponin ◽  
Acute Myocardial Injury ◽  
Acute Mi ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Background The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (MI) differentiates MI from myocardial injury. We characterised the temporal course of cardiac and non-cardiac outcomes associated with MI, acute and chronic myocardial injury. Methods We included all patients presenting to public emergency departments in South Australia between June 2011–Sept 2019. Episodes of care (EOCs) were classified into 5 groups based on high-sensitivity troponin-T (hs-cTnT) and diagnostic codes: 1) Acute MI [rise/fall in hs-cTnT and primary diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome], 2) Acute myocardial injury with coronary artery disease (CAD) [rise/fall in hs-cTnT and diagnosis of CAD], 3) Acute myocardial injury without CAD [rise/fall in hs-cTnT without diagnosis of CAD], 4) Chronic myocardial injury [elevated hs-cTnT without rise/fall], and 5) No myocardial injury. Multivariable flexible parametric models were used to characterize the temporal hazard of death, MI, heart failure (HF), and ventricular arrhythmia. Results 372,310 EOCs (218,878 individuals) were included: acute MI (19,052 [5.12%]), acute myocardial injury with CAD (6,928 [1.86%]), acute myocardial injury without CAD (32,231 [8.66%]), chronic myocardial injury (55,056 [14.79%]), and no myocardial injury (259,043 [69.58%]). We observed an early hazard of MI and HF after acute MI and acute myocardial injury with CAD. In contrast, subsequent MI risk was lower and more constant in patients with acute injury without CAD or chronic injury. All patterns of myocardial injury were associated with significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality and ventricular arrhythmia. Conclusions Different patterns of myocardial injury were associated with divergent profiles of subsequent cardiac and non-cardiac risk. The therapeutic approach and modifiability of such excess risks require further research.

scholarly journals Incidence and outcomes of perioperative myocardial infarction/injury diagnosed by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle M. Gualandro ◽  
◽  
Christian Puelacher ◽  
Giovanna Lurati Buse ◽  
Noemi Glarner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Perioperative Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Important Complication ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Background  Perioperative myocardial infarction/injury (PMI) diagnosed by high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) T is frequent and a prognostically important complication of non-cardiac surgery. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and outcome of PMI diagnosed using hs-cTnI, and compare it to PMI diagnosed using hs-cTnT. Methods We prospectively included 2455 patients at high cardiovascular risk undergoing 3111 non-cardiac surgeries, for whom hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT concentrations were measured before surgery and on postoperative days 1 and 2. PMI was defined as a composite of perioperative myocardial infarction (PMIInfarct) and perioperative myocardial injury (PMIInjury), according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Results Using hs-cTnI, the incidence of overall PMI was 9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8–10%), including PMIInfarct 2.6% (95% CI 2.0–3.2) and PMIInjury 6.1% (95% CI 5.3–6.9%), which was lower versus using hs-cTnT: overall PMI 15% (95% CI 14–16%), PMIInfarct 3.7% (95% CI 3.0–4.4) and PMIInjury 11.3% (95% CI 10.2–12.4%). All-cause mortality occurred in 52 (2%) patients within 30 days and 217 (9%) within 1 year. Using hs-cTnI, both PMIInfarct and PMIInjury were independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.5 [95% CI 1.1–6.0], and aHR 2.8 [95% CI 1.4–5.5], respectively) and, 1-year all-cause mortality (aHR 2.0 [95% CI 1.2–3.3], and aHR 1.8 [95% CI 1.2–2.7], respectively). Overall, the prognostic impact of PMI diagnosed by hs-cTnI was comparable to the prognostic impact of PMI using hs-cTnT. Conclusions Using hs-cTnI, PMI is less common versus using hs-cTnT. Using hs-cTnI, both PMIInfarct and PMIInjury remain independent predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality. Graphic abstract

scholarly journals High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Chapman ◽  
Philip D. Adamson ◽  
Anoop S.V. Shah ◽  
Atul Anand ◽  
Fiona E. Strachan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Categories ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Background: The introduction of more sensitive cardiac troponin assays has led to increased recognition of myocardial injury in acute illnesses other than acute coronary syndrome. The Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction recommends high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing and classification of patients with myocardial injury based on pathogenesis, but the clinical implications of implementing this guideline are not well understood. Methods: In a stepped-wedge cluster randomized, controlled trial, we implemented a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay and the recommendations of the Universal Definition in 48 282 consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. In a prespecified secondary analysis, we compared the primary outcome of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death and secondary outcome of noncardiovascular death at 1 year across diagnostic categories. Results: Implementation increased the diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction by 11% (510/4471), type 2 myocardial infarction by 22% (205/916), and acute and chronic myocardial injury by 36% (443/1233) and 43% (389/898), respectively. Compared with those without myocardial injury, the rate of the primary outcome was highest in those with type 1 myocardial infarction (cause-specific hazard ratio [HR] 5.64 [95% CI, 5.12–6.22]), but was similar across diagnostic categories, whereas noncardiovascular deaths were highest in those with acute myocardial injury (cause specific HR 2.65 [95% CI, 2.33–3.01]). Despite modest increases in antiplatelet therapy and coronary revascularization after implementation in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, the primary outcome was unchanged (cause specific HR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.82–1.21]). Increased recognition of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury did not lead to changes in investigation, treatment or outcomes. Conclusions: Implementation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and the recommendations of the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction identified patients at high-risk of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events but was not associated with consistent increases in treatment or improved outcomes. Trials of secondary prevention are urgently required to determine whether this risk is modifiable in patients without type 1 myocardial infarction. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01852123.

scholarly journals Interphysician agreement on subclassification of myocardial infarction

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (15) ◽  
pp. 1284-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Gard ◽  
Bertil Lindahl ◽  
Gorav Batra ◽  
Nermin Hadziosmanovic ◽  
Marcus Hjort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Plaque Rupture ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
The Third ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

ObjectiveThe universal definition of myocardial infarction (MI) differentiates MI due to oxygen supply/demand mismatch (type 2) from MI due to plaque rupture (type 1) as well as from myocardial injuries of non-ischaemic or multifactorial nature. The purpose of this study was to investigate how often physicians agree in this classification and what factors lead to agreement or disagreement.MethodsA total of 1328 patients diagnosed with MI at eight different Swedish hospitals 2011 were included. All patients were retrospectively reclassified into different MI or myocardial injury subtypes by two independent specially trained physicians, strictly adhering to the third universal definition of MI.ResultsOverall, there was a moderate interobserver agreement with a kappa coefficient (κ) of 0.55 in this classification. There was substantial agreement when distinguishing type 1 MI (κ: 0.61), compared with moderate agreement when distinguishing type 2 MI (κ: 0.54). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, ST elevation MI (P<0.001), performed coronary angiography (P<0.001) and larger changes in troponin levels (P=0.023) independently made the physicians agree significantly more often, while they disagreed more often with symptoms of dyspnoea (P<0.001), higher systolic blood pressure (P=0.001) and higher C reactive protein levels on admission (P=0.016).ConclusionDistinguishing MI types is challenging also for trained adjudicators. Although strictly adhering to the third universal definition of MI, differentiation between type 1 MI, type 2 MI and myocardial injury only gave a moderate rate of interobserver agreement. More precise and clinically applicable criteria for the current classification, particularly for type 2 MI diagnosis, are urgently needed.

Abstract 350: Assessment of Clinicians’ Attitudes and Knowledge About Cardiac Troponin Testing

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Jain ◽  
Andrew Hammes ◽  
Eric Rudofker ◽  
Karen Ream ◽  
Andrew E Levy
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
The United States ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Attitudes And Knowledge ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Attending Physicians

In the United States, the positive predictive value (PPV) of cardiac troponin for type 1 myocardial infarction is substantially lower than in Europe (15% vs. 50%). Further, even with publication of the 4 th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, recent studies have shown that inaccurate classification of myocardial injury is common among clinicians in the United States. These findings are at least partly attributable to clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes about cardiac troponin testing; a survey of these parameters has never been conducted. Clinicians at the University of Colorado completed a brief 8-question multiple-choice survey related to troponin use, definitions of myocardial infarction and clinical assessment of elevated troponin levels. The survey was distributed via secure email and administered electronically using the Qualtrics™ platform. Responses were anonymous, completion was estimated to take 3 minutes and a lottery award system was used as an incentive for participation. Respondents included trainees, advanced practice providers and attending physicians from internal medicine, emergency medicine and medical subspecialties. We plan to obtain a total of 300 responses with descriptive findings of preliminary results included below. The survey was completed by 114 clinicians: 37 interns (32%), 45 residents (39%), 9 advanced practice providers (8%), 11 fellows (10%), and 12 attending physicians (11%). Regarding indications for troponin testing, 93% (106/114) indicated that they “usually” or “always” check troponin levels in patients with chest pain. More interestingly, 46% (52/112) reported checking troponin on “undifferentiated patients” at least half the time. For troponin interpretation, 97% (110/114) of participants identified that troponin levels alone cannot rule in or rule out coronary artery disease. In contrast, only 36% (41/114) and 55% (63/114), respectively, identified the NPV and PPV of a contemporary troponin assay for type 1 MI. Further, only 50% (57/114) of respondents identified that the likelihood of type 1 MI increases as troponin levels increase. Three brief clinical vignettes revealed that, while 78% (89/114) and 74% (45/61) of participants, respectively, identified type 1 MI and type 2 MI presentations, only 40% (21/53) of respondents correctly identified a vignette for non-ischemic myocardial injury. Concordant with this finding, 54% (61/114) of clinicians correctly identified the 4 th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. These preliminary findings highlight important facets of clinician attitudes and knowledge about troponin testing that help explain the poor PPV for troponin and diagnostic misclassification observed among U.S. clinicians. These results could help guide curricular and clinical decision support interventions designed to improve the use and interpretation of cardiac troponin testing.

scholarly journals Global Adoption of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponins and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 484-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atul Anand ◽  
Anoop S V Shah ◽  
Agim Beshiri ◽  
Allan S Jaffe ◽  
Nicholas L Mills
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Threshold ◽  
Serial Sampling ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract BACKGROUND The universal definition of myocardial infarction (UDMI) standardizes the approach to the diagnosis and management of myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing is recommended because these assays have improved precision at low concentrations, but concerns over specificity may have limited their implementation. METHODS We undertook a global survey of 1902 medical centers in 23 countries evenly distributed across 5 continents to assess adoption of key recommendations from the UDMI. Respondents involved in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome completed a structured telephone questionnaire detailing the primary biomarker, diagnostic thresholds, and clinical pathways used to identify myocardial infarction. RESULTS Cardiac troponin was the primary diagnostic biomarker at 96% of surveyed sites. Only 41% of centers had adopted high-sensitivity assays, with wide variation from 7% in North America to 60% in Europe. Sites using high-sensitivity troponin more frequently used serial sampling pathways (91% vs 78%) and the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold (74% vs 66%) than sites using previous-generation assays. Furthermore, high-sensitivity institutions more often used earlier serial sampling (≤3 h) and accelerated diagnostic pathways. Fewer than 1 in 5 high-sensitivity sites had adopted sex-specific thresholds (18%). CONCLUSIONS There has been global progress toward the recommendations of the UDMI, particularly in the use of the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold and serial sampling. However, high-sensitivity assays are still used by a minority of sites, and sex-specific thresholds by even fewer. Additional efforts are required to improve risk stratification and diagnosis of patients with myocardial infarction.

scholarly journals Discordance between ICD-Coded Myocardial Infarction and Diagnosis according to the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 415-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Díaz-Garzón ◽  
Yader Sandoval ◽  
Stephen W Smith ◽  
Sara Love ◽  
Karen Schulz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Healthcare Management ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Kappa Index ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract BACKGROUND International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding is the standard diagnostic tool for healthcare management. At present, type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) classification by the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (MI) remains ignored in the ICD system. We determined the concordance for the diagnosis of MI using ICD-9 coding vs the Universal Definition. METHODS Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) was measured by both contemporary (cTnI) and high-sensitivity (hs-cTnI) assays in 1927 consecutive emergency department (ED) patients [Use of TROPonin In Acute coronary syndromes (UTROPIA) cohort] who had cTnI ordered on clinical indication. All patients were adjudicated using both contemporary and hs-cTnI assays. The Kappa index and McNemar test were used to assess concordance between ICD-9 code 410 and type 1 MI (T1MI) and type 2 MI (T2MI). RESULTS Among the 249 adjudicated MIs using the contemporary cTnI, only 69 (28%) were ICD-coded MIs. Of 180 patients not ICD coded as MI, 34 (19%) were T1MI and 146 (81%) were T2MI. For the ICD-coded MIs, 79% were T1MI and 21% were T2MI. A fair Kappa index, 0.386, and a McNemar difference of 0.0892 (P &lt; 0.001) were found. Among the 207 adjudicated MIs using the hs-cTnI assay, 67 (32%) were ICD coded as MI. Of the 140 patients not ICD coded as MI, 27 (19%) were T1MI and 113 (81%) were T2MI. For the ICD-coded MIs, 85% were T1MI and 15% T2MI. A moderate Kappa index, 0.439, and a McNemar difference of 0.0674 (P &lt; 0.001) were found. CONCLUSIONS ICD-9–coded MIs captured only a small proportion of adjudicated MIs, primarily from not coding T2MI. Our findings emphasize the need for an ICD code for T2MI.

scholarly journals Global Adoption of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponins and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atul Anand ◽  
Anoop SV Shah ◽  
Agim Beshiri ◽  
Allan S Jaffe ◽  
Nicholas L Mills
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Third ◽  
Diagnostic Threshold ◽  
Serial Sampling ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractImportanceThe third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction aimed to standardize the approach to the diagnosis and management of myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing was recommended, as these assays have improved precision at low concentrations, but concerns over specificity may have limited implementation.ObjectiveTo determine the global adoption of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and key recommendations from the Universal Definition.Design, Setting and ParticipantsGlobal survey of 1,902 medical centers across 23 countries evenly distributed across all five continents. Included respondents were involved in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome at their institutions.Main Outcomes and MeasuresStructured questionnaire detailing the primary biomarker used for myocardial infarction, diagnostic thresholds and critical elements of clinical pathways for comparison to the third Universal Definition recommendations.ResultsCardiac troponin was the primary diagnostic biomarker for myocardial infarction at 96% of all sites surveyed. Only 41% of centers had adopted high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays, with wide variation from 7% in North America to 60% in Europe. Sites using high-sensitivity assays more frequently employed serial sampling pathways (91% vs. 78%) and the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold (74% vs. 66%) when compared to sites using the previous generation of troponin assays. Furthermore, sites using high-sensitivity assays more often used earlier serial sampling (≤3 hours) and accelerated diagnostic pathways. However, fewer than 1 in 5 sites using high-sensitivity assays had adopted sex-specific thresholds (18%).Conclusions and RelevanceProgress has been made in adopting the recommendations of the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, particularly in the use of the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold and serial sampling. However, high-sensitivity assays are used in a minority of sites and sex-specific thresholds in even fewer. These findings highlight regions where additional efforts are required to improve the risk stratification and diagnosis of patients with myocardial infarction.

scholarly journals Update on the Universal Definition of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Light of New Data

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Thygesen ◽  
J. Searle
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Myocardial Ischemia ◽  
European Heart Journal ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology

At the 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Conference in Munich, the updated Universal Definition of myocardial infarction was presented for the first time and was then published simultaneously in five medical journals (European Heart Journal, Circulation, Journal of American College of Cardiology, Nature Reviews Cardiology, Global Heart). Major changes in this updated version include the differentiation between myocardial ischemia and myocardial injury, which gives credit to the relatively large number of patients with troponin positive test results, especially when measured with high sensitivity assays, in patients without myocardial ischemia. Another important topic is the revised criteria for the diagnoses of acute myocardial ischemia related to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary arterial bypass grafting (CABG).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document