scholarly journals Global Adoption of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponins and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atul Anand ◽  
Anoop SV Shah ◽  
Agim Beshiri ◽  
Allan S Jaffe ◽  
Nicholas L Mills
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Third ◽  
Diagnostic Threshold ◽  
Serial Sampling ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractImportanceThe third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction aimed to standardize the approach to the diagnosis and management of myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing was recommended, as these assays have improved precision at low concentrations, but concerns over specificity may have limited implementation.ObjectiveTo determine the global adoption of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and key recommendations from the Universal Definition.Design, Setting and ParticipantsGlobal survey of 1,902 medical centers across 23 countries evenly distributed across all five continents. Included respondents were involved in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome at their institutions.Main Outcomes and MeasuresStructured questionnaire detailing the primary biomarker used for myocardial infarction, diagnostic thresholds and critical elements of clinical pathways for comparison to the third Universal Definition recommendations.ResultsCardiac troponin was the primary diagnostic biomarker for myocardial infarction at 96% of all sites surveyed. Only 41% of centers had adopted high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays, with wide variation from 7% in North America to 60% in Europe. Sites using high-sensitivity assays more frequently employed serial sampling pathways (91% vs. 78%) and the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold (74% vs. 66%) when compared to sites using the previous generation of troponin assays. Furthermore, sites using high-sensitivity assays more often used earlier serial sampling (≤3 hours) and accelerated diagnostic pathways. However, fewer than 1 in 5 sites using high-sensitivity assays had adopted sex-specific thresholds (18%).Conclusions and RelevanceProgress has been made in adopting the recommendations of the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, particularly in the use of the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold and serial sampling. However, high-sensitivity assays are used in a minority of sites and sex-specific thresholds in even fewer. These findings highlight regions where additional efforts are required to improve the risk stratification and diagnosis of patients with myocardial infarction.

scholarly journals Global Adoption of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponins and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 484-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atul Anand ◽  
Anoop S V Shah ◽  
Agim Beshiri ◽  
Allan S Jaffe ◽  
Nicholas L Mills
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Threshold ◽  
Serial Sampling ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract BACKGROUND The universal definition of myocardial infarction (UDMI) standardizes the approach to the diagnosis and management of myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing is recommended because these assays have improved precision at low concentrations, but concerns over specificity may have limited their implementation. METHODS We undertook a global survey of 1902 medical centers in 23 countries evenly distributed across 5 continents to assess adoption of key recommendations from the UDMI. Respondents involved in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome completed a structured telephone questionnaire detailing the primary biomarker, diagnostic thresholds, and clinical pathways used to identify myocardial infarction. RESULTS Cardiac troponin was the primary diagnostic biomarker at 96% of surveyed sites. Only 41% of centers had adopted high-sensitivity assays, with wide variation from 7% in North America to 60% in Europe. Sites using high-sensitivity troponin more frequently used serial sampling pathways (91% vs 78%) and the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold (74% vs 66%) than sites using previous-generation assays. Furthermore, high-sensitivity institutions more often used earlier serial sampling (≤3 h) and accelerated diagnostic pathways. Fewer than 1 in 5 high-sensitivity sites had adopted sex-specific thresholds (18%). CONCLUSIONS There has been global progress toward the recommendations of the UDMI, particularly in the use of the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold and serial sampling. However, high-sensitivity assays are still used by a minority of sites, and sex-specific thresholds by even fewer. Additional efforts are required to improve risk stratification and diagnosis of patients with myocardial infarction.

scholarly journals Diagnosis of Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction Using a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay with Sex-Specific 99th Percentiles Based on the Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Classification System

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yader Sandoval ◽  
Stephen W Smith ◽  
Karen M Schulz ◽  
MaryAnn M Murakami ◽  
Sara A Love ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
The Third ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract BACKGROUND The frequency and characteristics of myocardial infarction (MI) subtypes per the Third Universal Definition of MI (TUDMI) classification system using high-sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponin assays with sex-specific cutoffs is not well known. We sought to describe the diagnostic characteristics of type 1 (T1MI) and type 2 (T2MI) MI using an hs–cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay with sex-specific cutoffs. METHODS A total of 310 consecutive patients with serial cTnI measurements obtained on clinical indication were studied with contemporary and hs-cTnI assays. Ninety-ninth percentile sex-specific upper reference limits (URLs) for the hs-cTnI assay were 16 ng/L for females and 34 ng/L for males. The TUDMI consensus recommendations were used to define and adjudicate MI based on each URL. RESULTS A total of 127 (41%) patients had at least 1 hs-cTnI exceeding the sex-specific 99th percentiles, whereas 183 (59%) had hs-cTnI within the reference interval. Females had more myocardial injury related to supply/demand ischemia than males (39% vs 18%, P = 0.01), whereas males had more multifactorial or indeterminate injury (52% vs 33%, P = 0.05). By hs-cTnI, there were 32 (10%) acute MIs, among which 10 (3%) were T1MI and 22 (7%) were T2MI. T2MI represented 69% (22 out of 32) of all acute MIs, whereas T1MI represented 31% (10 out of 32). Ninety-five patients (31%) had an increased hs-cTnI above the 99th percentile but did not meet criteria for acute MI. The most common triggers for T2MI were tachyarrhythmias, hypotension/shock, and hypertension. By contemporary cTnI, more MIs (14 T1MI and 29 T2MI) were diagnosed. By contemporary cTnI, there were 43 MIs, 14 T1MI, and 29 T2MI. CONCLUSIONS Fewer MI diagnoses were found with the hs-cTnI assay, contrary to the commonly accepted idea that hs-cTnI will lead to excessive false-positive diagnoses.

scholarly journals High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Chapman ◽  
Philip D. Adamson ◽  
Anoop S.V. Shah ◽  
Atul Anand ◽  
Fiona E. Strachan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Categories ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Background: The introduction of more sensitive cardiac troponin assays has led to increased recognition of myocardial injury in acute illnesses other than acute coronary syndrome. The Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction recommends high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing and classification of patients with myocardial injury based on pathogenesis, but the clinical implications of implementing this guideline are not well understood. Methods: In a stepped-wedge cluster randomized, controlled trial, we implemented a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay and the recommendations of the Universal Definition in 48 282 consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. In a prespecified secondary analysis, we compared the primary outcome of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death and secondary outcome of noncardiovascular death at 1 year across diagnostic categories. Results: Implementation increased the diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction by 11% (510/4471), type 2 myocardial infarction by 22% (205/916), and acute and chronic myocardial injury by 36% (443/1233) and 43% (389/898), respectively. Compared with those without myocardial injury, the rate of the primary outcome was highest in those with type 1 myocardial infarction (cause-specific hazard ratio [HR] 5.64 [95% CI, 5.12–6.22]), but was similar across diagnostic categories, whereas noncardiovascular deaths were highest in those with acute myocardial injury (cause specific HR 2.65 [95% CI, 2.33–3.01]). Despite modest increases in antiplatelet therapy and coronary revascularization after implementation in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, the primary outcome was unchanged (cause specific HR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.82–1.21]). Increased recognition of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury did not lead to changes in investigation, treatment or outcomes. Conclusions: Implementation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and the recommendations of the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction identified patients at high-risk of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events but was not associated with consistent increases in treatment or improved outcomes. Trials of secondary prevention are urgently required to determine whether this risk is modifiable in patients without type 1 myocardial infarction. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01852123.

scholarly journals 144 High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Chapman ◽  
Philip Adamson ◽  
Anoop Shah ◽  
Atul Anand ◽  
Fiona Strachan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract 19710: Causes for Increased Cardiac Troponin I Using Gender-Specific 99th Percentiles From a High Sensitivity Assay in a US Population

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yader Sandoval ◽  
Stephen W Smith ◽  
Karen M Schulz ◽  
MaryAnn M Murakami ◽  
Fred S Apple
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Ischemia ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Plaque Rupture ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Gender Specific

Introduction: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have not yet been FDA cleared for clinical use in the United States (US). Pending expected approval of hs-cTn assays, which will use gender-specific cutoffs (GSC), it is relevant to recognize the causes of cTn increases using hs-cTnI assays in a US population. Our purpose was to describe the frequency of distinct etiologies of hs-cTnI assay increases using GSC. Methods: Retrospective study of 310 patients with serial hs-cTnI (Abbott ARCHITECT, 99th percentiles: F:16 ng/L; M:34 ng/L) measurements. Patients with an increased hs-cTnI were adjudicated into categories according to the 3rd Universal Definition of MI. Categories included, A: primary myocardial ischemia (i.e. plaque rupture); B: injury secondary to supply/demand imbalance; C: injury not related to myocardial ischemia (i.e. cardiac contusion, ablation, shock, surgery); D: multifactorial or indeterminate myocardial injury (i.e. heart failure, critically ill, pulmonary HTN, sepsis, stroke, renal failure, pulmonary embolism); E: Unknown. Results: 127 (41%) had an increased hs-cTnI above the GSC 99th percentile, whereas 183 (59%) had a normal hs-cTnI. The most common causes of hs-cTnI increases were: a) multifactorial or indeterminate injury - 43% among all patients and 52% in males, and b) supply/demand imbalance - 39% in women (Table). Injury related to primary myocardial ischemia was present in 10% (n=13). Females had more injury related to supply/demand ischemia than males (39% vs. 18%, p=0.01), whereas males had more multifactorial or indeterminate injury (52% vs. 33%, p=0.05). Conclusions: Most increased hs-cTnI values were explained by non-plaque rupture conditions. Males tended to have hs-cTnI increases due to multifactorial/indeterminate causes, whereas in women supply/demand imbalance was the most common etiology. Investigations are needed to better understand if etiologies of myocardial injury have gender differences.

Abstract 350: Assessment of Clinicians’ Attitudes and Knowledge About Cardiac Troponin Testing

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Jain ◽  
Andrew Hammes ◽  
Eric Rudofker ◽  
Karen Ream ◽  
Andrew E Levy
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
The United States ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Attitudes And Knowledge ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Attending Physicians

In the United States, the positive predictive value (PPV) of cardiac troponin for type 1 myocardial infarction is substantially lower than in Europe (15% vs. 50%). Further, even with publication of the 4 th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, recent studies have shown that inaccurate classification of myocardial injury is common among clinicians in the United States. These findings are at least partly attributable to clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes about cardiac troponin testing; a survey of these parameters has never been conducted. Clinicians at the University of Colorado completed a brief 8-question multiple-choice survey related to troponin use, definitions of myocardial infarction and clinical assessment of elevated troponin levels. The survey was distributed via secure email and administered electronically using the Qualtrics™ platform. Responses were anonymous, completion was estimated to take 3 minutes and a lottery award system was used as an incentive for participation. Respondents included trainees, advanced practice providers and attending physicians from internal medicine, emergency medicine and medical subspecialties. We plan to obtain a total of 300 responses with descriptive findings of preliminary results included below. The survey was completed by 114 clinicians: 37 interns (32%), 45 residents (39%), 9 advanced practice providers (8%), 11 fellows (10%), and 12 attending physicians (11%). Regarding indications for troponin testing, 93% (106/114) indicated that they “usually” or “always” check troponin levels in patients with chest pain. More interestingly, 46% (52/112) reported checking troponin on “undifferentiated patients” at least half the time. For troponin interpretation, 97% (110/114) of participants identified that troponin levels alone cannot rule in or rule out coronary artery disease. In contrast, only 36% (41/114) and 55% (63/114), respectively, identified the NPV and PPV of a contemporary troponin assay for type 1 MI. Further, only 50% (57/114) of respondents identified that the likelihood of type 1 MI increases as troponin levels increase. Three brief clinical vignettes revealed that, while 78% (89/114) and 74% (45/61) of participants, respectively, identified type 1 MI and type 2 MI presentations, only 40% (21/53) of respondents correctly identified a vignette for non-ischemic myocardial injury. Concordant with this finding, 54% (61/114) of clinicians correctly identified the 4 th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. These preliminary findings highlight important facets of clinician attitudes and knowledge about troponin testing that help explain the poor PPV for troponin and diagnostic misclassification observed among U.S. clinicians. These results could help guide curricular and clinical decision support interventions designed to improve the use and interpretation of cardiac troponin testing.

A comparison of cardiac troponin T delta change methods and the importance of the clinical context in the assessment of acute coronary syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 701-707
Author(s):  
Paul Simpson ◽  
Rosy Tirimacco ◽  
Penelope Cowley ◽  
May Siew ◽  
Narelle Berry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Clinical Context ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Delta Change

Background The management of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome is a significant challenge for clinicians. Guidelines for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction require a rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin, along with other criteria. Knowing what constitutes a significant delta change from baseline is still unclear and the literature is varied. Methods We compared three methods for determining cardiac troponin delta changes (relative, absolute and z-scores) for detecting acute myocardial infarction in 806 patients presenting to an emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Blood specimens were collected at admission and 2, 3, 4 and 6 h postadmission and tested on the Roche Elecsys high-sensitivity troponin T assay. Results A positive diagnosis for acute myocardial infarction was found in 39 (4.8%) patients. ROC AUC showed better performance for the absolute and z-score delta change (0.959–0.988 and 0.956–0.988, respectively) compared with relative delta change (0.921–0.960) at all time points in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Optimal timing for the second sample was at 4–6 h postadmission. Conclusions Although not statistically significant, the results show a trend of absolute and z-score delta change performing better than relative delta change for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The z-score approach allows for a single cut-off value across multiple high-sensitivity assays which could be useful in the clinical setting. Our study also highlighted the importance of interpreting cardiac troponin changes in the clinical context with a combination of the patient’s clinical history and electrocardiogram.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document