scholarly journals Diabetes Mellitus-Related Dysfunction of the Motor System

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (20) ◽  
pp. 7485
Author(s):  
Ken Muramatsu
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Corticospinal Tract ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Sensory System ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
New Perspective ◽  
The Brain

Although motor deficits in humans with diabetic neuropathy have been extensively researched, its effect on the motor system is thought to be lesser than that on the sensory system. Therefore, motor deficits are considered to be only due to sensory and muscle impairment. However, recent clinical and experimental studies have revealed that the brain and spinal cord, which are involved in the motor control of voluntary movement, are also affected by diabetes. This review focuses on the most important systems for voluntary motor control, mainly the cortico-muscular pathways, such as corticospinal tract and spinal motor neuron abnormalities. Specifically, axonal damage characterized by the proximodistal phenotype occurs in the corticospinal tract and motor neurons with long axons, and the transmission of motor commands from the brain to the muscles is impaired. These findings provide a new perspective to explain motor deficits in humans with diabetes. Finally, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment strategies for these disorders are presented.

scholarly journals Restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders: The relationship of attention and motor deficits

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 773-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Ravizza ◽  
Marjorie Solomon ◽  
Richard B. Ivry ◽  
Cameron S. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Autism Spectrum Disorders ◽  
Motor Control ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Repetitive Behaviors ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Attentional Orienting ◽  
Restricted And Repetitive Behaviors ◽  
Spectrum Disorders ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractRestricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs) are hallmark symptoms of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs); however, it has proven difficult to understand the mechanisms underlying these behaviors. One hypothesis suggests that RRBs are the result of a core deficit in attention. Alternatively, abnormalities of the motor system may constitute the central mechanism underlying RRBs, given motor deficits observed in ASDs. In this experiment, we investigated the etiology of RRBs and the relationship between attention and motor deficits. Movement impairments (a) may be indirectly related to attention deficits, (b) may result from a shared compromised process, or (c) may be independent. Twenty-two adolescents with ASD and 20 typically developing participants performed a spatial attention task. Movement impairments were assessed with a rhythmic tapping task. Attentional orienting and motor control were found to be related and supported the hypothesis that these impairments in ASD arise from a shared process. In contrast, measures of attention switching and motor control were found to be independent. Stereotyped behaviors, as assessed by parental ratings, were related more to the degree of motor impairment than to deficits of attention. These results suggest that both attentional orienting deficits and stereotyped RRBs are related to a compromised motor system.

Motor System

2017 ◽  
pp. 249-310
Author(s):  
Eduardo E. Benarroch ◽  
Jeremy K. Cutsforth-Gregory ◽  
Kelly D. Flemming
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Neural Control ◽  
Sensory System ◽  
Internal Organs ◽  
Motor Pathways ◽  
Accurate Localization ◽  
System P ◽  
Branchial Arches

All bodily movements, including those of internal organs, are the result of muscle contraction, which is under neural control. The muscles of the limbs, trunk, neck, and eyes are derived from somites. The muscles involved in facial expression, mastication, phonation, and swallowing are derived from the branchial arches. Somatic and limbic motor pathways arising from the cerebral cortex and brainstem control the activity of the motor neurons innervating all these muscles. The motor system, like the sensory system, includes a complex network of structures and pathways at all levels of the nervous system. This network mediates many types of motor activity. An understanding of its organization and the integration of the motor system with the sensory system is necessary for accurate localization and diagnosis of neurologic disease.

Taxonomies in Biology, Phonetics, Phonology, and Speech Motor Control

1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 596-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Folkins ◽  
Ken M. Bleile
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Motor Performance ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Speech Motor Control ◽  
Phonetic Transcription ◽  
Phonological Deficits ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Speech Motor

This article begins with a review explaining the different purposes of biological taxonomies. Taxonomic units are often dependent on the purpose for which the taxonomy has been constructed. Biological taxonomies provide an analogy that we use to emphasize some of the distinctions among the units of phonetic transcription systems, competence phonologies, and performance phonologies. The units of both phonology and phonetic transcription are considered as possible units of the speech motor system, and some of the difficulties of this assumption are explained. Although phonemic units, like units of phonetic transcription, are useful for many purposes, it is not theoretically necessary to use units derived as part of competence phonologies in systems attempting to explain phonological performance or speech motor performance. In this regard, we challenge the concept of coarticulation, because it is based on assumptions about the role of phonological or phonetic units in speech motor control. We offer an integrated perspective that has implications for research in speech motor control and deficits of the speech motor system. We see speech motor deficits as distinct from, yet possibly interacting with, phonological deficits.

scholarly journals Audiovisual Speech Integration Does Not Rely on the Motor System: Evidence from Articulatory Suppression, the McGurk Effect, and fMRI

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 606-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Matchin ◽  
Kier Groulx ◽  
Gregory Hickok
Keyword(s):  
Motor System ◽  
Articulatory Suppression ◽  
Sensory System ◽  
Mcgurk Effect ◽  
Visual Speech ◽  
Audiovisual Speech ◽  
Broca’S Area ◽  
Broca's Area ◽  
Motor Speech ◽  
The Brain

Visual speech influences the perception of heard speech. A classic example of this is the McGurk effect, whereby an auditory /pa/ overlaid onto a visual /ka/ induces the fusion percept of /ta/. Recent behavioral and neuroimaging research has highlighted the importance of both articulatory representations and motor speech regions of the brain, particularly Broca's area, in audiovisual (AV) speech integration. Alternatively, AV speech integration may be accomplished by the sensory system through multisensory integration in the posterior STS. We assessed the claims regarding the involvement of the motor system in AV integration in two experiments: (i) examining the effect of articulatory suppression on the McGurk effect and (ii) determining if motor speech regions show an AV integration profile. The hypothesis regarding experiment (i) is that if the motor system plays a role in McGurk fusion, distracting the motor system through articulatory suppression should result in a reduction of McGurk fusion. The results of experiment (i) showed that articulatory suppression results in no such reduction, suggesting that the motor system is not responsible for the McGurk effect. The hypothesis of experiment (ii) was that if the brain activation to AV speech in motor regions (such as Broca's area) reflects AV integration, the profile of activity should reflect AV integration: AV > AO (auditory only) and AV > VO (visual only). The results of experiment (ii) demonstrate that motor speech regions do not show this integration profile, whereas the posterior STS does. Instead, activity in motor regions is task dependent. The combined results suggest that AV speech integration does not rely on the motor system.

scholarly journals Brain-Machine Interfaces for Motor Control: A Guide for Neuroscience Clinicians

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan R. Martin ◽  
Tejas Sankar ◽  
Nir Lipsman ◽  
Andres M. Lozano
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Clinical Applications ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Brain Machine Interfaces ◽  
Early Use ◽  
Immense Potential ◽  
Early Human

With the growing interdependence between medicine and technology, the prospect of connecting machines to the human brain is rapidly being realized. The field of neuroprosthetics is transitioning from the proof of concept stage to the development of advanced clinical treatments. In one area of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) related to the motor system, also termed ‘motor neuroprosthetics’, research successes with implanted microelectrodes in animals have demonstrated immense potential for restoring motor deficits. Early human trials have also begun, with some success but also highlighting several technical challenges. Here we review the concepts and anatomy underlying motor BMI designs, review their early use in clinical applications, and offer a framework to evaluate these technologies in order to predict their eventual clinical utility. Ultimately, we hope to help neuroscience clinicians understand and participate in this burgeoning field.

Prediction of Disease Comorbidity Using HeteSim Scores based on Multiple Heterogeneous Networks

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 232-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuegong Chen ◽  
Wanwan Shi ◽  
Lei Deng
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Computational Method ◽  
Biological Information ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Disease Associations ◽  
Previous State

Background: Accumulating experimental studies have indicated that disease comorbidity causes additional pain to patients and leads to the failure of standard treatments compared to patients who have a single disease. Therefore, accurate prediction of potential comorbidity is essential to design more efficient treatment strategies. However, only a few disease comorbidities have been discovered in the clinic. Objective: In this work, we propose PCHS, an effective computational method for predicting disease comorbidity. Materials and Methods: We utilized the HeteSim measure to calculate the relatedness score for different disease pairs in the global heterogeneous network, which integrates six networks based on biological information, including disease-disease associations, drug-drug interactions, protein-protein interactions and associations among them. We built the prediction model using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) based on the HeteSim scores. Results and Conclusion: The results showed that PCHS performed significantly better than previous state-of-the-art approaches and achieved an AUC score of 0.90 in 10-fold cross-validation. Furthermore, some of our predictions have been verified in literatures, indicating the effectiveness of our method.

Role of Flavonoids in Neurodegenerative Disorders with Special Emphasis on Tangeritin

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 581-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambreen Fatima ◽  
Yasir Hasan Siddique
Keyword(s):  
Medicinal Plants ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Neurodegenerative Disorders ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Dietary Supplementation ◽  
Plant Polyphenols ◽  
Promising Candidate ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
The Brain

Flavonoids are naturally occurring plant polyphenols found universally in all fruits, vegetables and medicinal plants. They have emerged as a promising candidate in the formulation of treatment strategies for various neurodegenerative disorders. The use of flavonoid rich plant extracts and food in dietary supplementation have shown favourable outcomes. The present review describes the types, properties and metabolism of flavonoids. Neuroprotective role of various flavonoids and the possible mechanism of action in the brain against the neurodegeneration have been described in detail with special emphasis on the tangeritin.

scholarly journals Long-term motor deficit in brain tumour surgery with preserved intra-operative motor-evoked potentials

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Giampiccolo ◽  
Cristiano Parisi ◽  
Pietro Meneghelli ◽  
Vincenzo Tramontano ◽  
Federica Basaldella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Brain Tumour ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Corticospinal Tract ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Motor Deficit ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Brain Tumour Surgery

Abstract Muscle motor-evoked potentials are commonly monitored during brain tumour surgery in motor areas, as these are assumed to reflect the integrity of descending motor pathways, including the corticospinal tract. However, while the loss of muscle motor-evoked potentials at the end of surgery is associated with long-term motor deficits (muscle motor-evoked potential-related deficits), there is increasing evidence that motor deficit can occur despite no change in muscle motor-evoked potentials (muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits), particularly after surgery of non-primary regions involved in motor control. In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence of muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits and to identify the associated brain regions. We retrospectively reviewed 125 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peri-Rolandic lesions using intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring. Intraoperative changes in muscle motor-evoked potentials were correlated with motor outcome, assessed by the Medical Research Council scale. We performed voxel–lesion–symptom mapping to identify which resected regions were associated with short- and long-term muscle motor-evoked potential-associated motor deficits. Muscle motor-evoked potentials reductions significantly predicted long-term motor deficits. However, in more than half of the patients who experienced long-term deficits (12/22 patients), no muscle motor-evoked potential reduction was reported during surgery. Lesion analysis showed that muscle motor-evoked potential-related long-term motor deficits were associated with direct or ischaemic damage to the corticospinal tract, whereas muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits occurred when supplementary motor areas were resected in conjunction with dorsal premotor regions and the anterior cingulate. Our results indicate that long-term motor deficits unrelated to the corticospinal tract can occur more often than currently reported. As these deficits cannot be predicted by muscle motor-evoked potentials, a combination of awake and/or novel asleep techniques other than muscle motor-evoked potentials monitoring should be implemented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document