scholarly journals Evaluation of Empirical and Machine Learning Algorithms for Estimation of Coastal Water Quality Parameters

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majid Nazeer ◽  
Mohammad Alsahli ◽  
Ahmad Waqas ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Coastal Water ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Water Quality Parameters ◽  
Coastal Water Quality

scholarly journals Retrieval of Water Quality from UAV-Borne Hyperspectral Imagery: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 3928
Author(s):  
Qikai Lu ◽  
Wei Si ◽  
Lifei Wei ◽  
Zhongqiang Li ◽  
Zhihong Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Hyperspectral Data ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Water Bodies ◽  
Water Quality Parameters ◽  
World Population ◽  
Freshwater Resources

The rapidly increasing world population and human activities accelerate the crisis of the limited freshwater resources. Water quality must be monitored for the sustainability of freshwater resources. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-borne hyperspectral data can capture fine features of water bodies, which have been widely used for monitoring water quality. In this study, nine machine learning algorithms are systematically evaluated for the inversion of water quality parameters including chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) and suspended solids (SS) with UAV-borne hyperspectral data. In comparing the experimental results of the machine learning model on the water quality parameters, we can observe that the prediction performance of the Catboost regression (CBR) model is the best. However, the prediction performances of the Multi-layer Perceptron regression (MLPR) and Elastic net (EN) models are very unsatisfactory, indicating that the MLPR and EN models are not suitable for the inversion of water quality parameters. In addition, the water quality distribution map is generated, which can be used to identify polluted areas of water bodies.

scholarly journals Prediction of E. coli Concentrations in Agricultural Pond Waters: Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms

2022 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Stocker ◽  
Yakov A. Pachepsky ◽  
Robert L. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Water Quality Parameters ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Stochastic Gradient Boosting ◽  
Significant Difference

The microbial quality of irrigation water is an important issue as the use of contaminated waters has been linked to several foodborne outbreaks. To expedite microbial water quality determinations, many researchers estimate concentrations of the microbial contamination indicator Escherichia coli (E. coli) from the concentrations of physiochemical water quality parameters. However, these relationships are often non-linear and exhibit changes above or below certain threshold values. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been shown to make accurate predictions in datasets with complex relationships. The purpose of this work was to evaluate several ML models for the prediction of E. coli in agricultural pond waters. Two ponds in Maryland were monitored from 2016 to 2018 during the irrigation season. E. coli concentrations along with 12 other water quality parameters were measured in water samples. The resulting datasets were used to predict E. coli using stochastic gradient boosting (SGB) machines, random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithms. The RF model provided the lowest RMSE value for predicted E. coli concentrations in both ponds in individual years and over consecutive years in almost all cases. For individual years, the RMSE of the predicted E. coli concentrations (log10 CFU 100 ml−1) ranged from 0.244 to 0.346 and 0.304 to 0.418 for Pond 1 and 2, respectively. For the 3-year datasets, these values were 0.334 and 0.381 for Pond 1 and 2, respectively. In most cases there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the RMSE of RF and other ML models when these RMSE were treated as statistics derived from 10-fold cross-validation performed with five repeats. Important E. coli predictors were turbidity, dissolved organic matter content, specific conductance, chlorophyll concentration, and temperature. Model predictive performance did not significantly differ when 5 predictors were used vs. 8 or 12, indicating that more tedious and costly measurements provide no substantial improvement in the predictive accuracy of the evaluated algorithms.

Remote sensing inversion of water quality in coastal sea area based on machine learning: a case study of Shenzhen bay, China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaotong Zhu ◽  
Jinhui Jeanne Huang
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Water Environment ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Dynamic Monitoring ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Seawater Quality

<p>Remote sensing monitoring has the characteristics of wide monitoring range, celerity, low cost for long-term dynamic monitoring of water environment. With the flourish of artificial intelligence, machine learning has enabled remote sensing inversion of seawater quality to achieve higher prediction accuracy. However, due to the physicochemical property of the water quality parameters, the performance of algorithms differs a lot. In order to improve the predictive accuracy of seawater quality parameters, we proposed a technical framework to identify the optimal machine learning algorithms using Sentinel-2 satellite and in-situ seawater sample data. In the study, we select three algorithms, i.e. support vector regression (SVR), XGBoost and deep learning (DL), and four seawater quality parameters, i.e. dissolved oxygen (DO), total dissolved solids (TDS), turbidity(TUR) and chlorophyll-a (Chla). The results show that SVR is a more precise algorithm to inverse DO (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.81). XGBoost has the best accuracy for Chla and Tur inversion (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75 and 0.78 respectively) while DL performs better in TDS (R<sup>2</sup> =0.789). Overall, this research provides a theoretical support for high precision remote sensing inversion of offshore seawater quality parameters based on machine learning.</p>

Prediction on water quality of a lake in Chennai, India using machine learning algorithms

2021 ◽  
Vol 218 ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
D. Venkata Vara Prasad ◽  
Lokeswari Y. Venkataramana ◽  
P. Senthil Kumar ◽  
G. Prasannamedha ◽  
K. Soumya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document