scholarly journals Methane and Hydrogen Sulfide Production from Co-Digestion of Gummy Waste with a Food Waste, Grease Waste, and Dairy Manure Mixture

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 4464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Choudhury ◽  
Lansing

Co-digestion of dairy manure with waste organic substrates has been shown to increase the methane (CH4) yield of farm-scale anaerobic digestion (AD). A gummy vitamin waste (GVW) product was evaluated as an AD co-digestion substrate using batch AD testing. The GVW product was added at four inclusion levels (0%, 5%, 9%, and 23% on a wet mass basis) to a co-digestion substrate mixture of dairy manure (DM), food-waste (FW), and grease-waste (GW) and compared to mono-digestion of the GVW, DM, FW, and GW substrates. All GVW co-digestion treatments significantly increased CH4 yield by 126–151% (336–374 mL CH4/g volatile solids (VS)) compared to DM-only treatment (149 mL CH4/g VS). The GVW co-digestion treatments also significantly decreased the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) content in the biogas by 66–83% (35.1–71.9 mL H2S/kg VS) compared to DM-only (212 mL H2S/kg VS) due to the low sulfur (S) content in GVW waste. The study showed that GVW is a potentially valuable co-digestion substrate for dairy manure. The high density of VS and low moisture and S content of GVW resulted in higher CH4 yields and lower H2S concentrations, which could be economically beneficial for dairy farmers.

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 2703
Author(s):  
Hui Wang ◽  
Horacio A. Aguirre-Villegas ◽  
Rebecca A. Larson ◽  
Asli Alkan-Ozkaynak

Manure characteristics change through processing, including anaerobic digestion (AD). These changes can alter handling of manure during downstream operations. This study analyzed the density, total solids (TS) content, and volatile solids (VS) content of pre-digested and anaerobically digested dairy manure from seven dairy farms in Wisconsin. The density of pre-digested manure increased from 990 to 1065 kg m−3 as the TS level increased from 1.5% to 13.0%. Density and TS for pre-digested manure from facilities using separated solids as bedding were related with a linear model for TS ranging from 1.5% to 13.0% and with a polynomial model for TS ranging from 1.5% to 50%. The model shows that density decreases with an increasing TS content when TS is greater than 8.0%. Manure from dairy facilities that used sand bedding had a VS/TS ratio of 0.87. This ratio was higher than the ratio when manure solids were used as bedding (0.81) and when food waste was incorporated into the digester (0.77). This study also provides a simple methodology to estimate biogas yield by using the density of pre- and post-digested manure.


2015 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley J. Belle ◽  
Stephanie Lansing ◽  
Walter Mulbry ◽  
Ray R. Weil

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 3064
Author(s):  
Roberta Mota-Panizio ◽  
Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez ◽  
Luis Carmo-Calado ◽  
Gonçalo Lourinho ◽  
Paulo Sérgio Duque de Brito

The present study evaluates the digestion of cork boiling wastewater (CBW) through a biochemical methane potential (BMP) test. BMP assays were carried out with a working volume of 600 mL at a constant mesophilic temperature (35 °C). The experiment bottles contained CBW and inoculum (digested sludge from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP)), with a ratio of inoculum/substrate (Ino/CBW) of 1:1 and 2:1 on the basis of volatile solids (VSs); the codigestion with food waste (FW) had a ratio of 2/0.7:0.3 (Ino/CBW:FW) and the codigestion with cow manure (CM) had a ratio of 2/0.5:0.5 (Ino/CBW:CM). Biogas and methane production was proportional to the inoculum substrate ratio (ISR) used. BMP tests have proved to be valuable for inferring the adequacy of anaerobic digestion to treat wastewater from the cork industry. The results indicate that the biomethane potential of CBWs for Ino/CBW ratios 1:1 and 2:1 is very low compared to other organic substrates. For the codigestion tests, the test with the Ino/CBW:CM ratio of 2/0.7:0.3 showed better biomethane yields, being in the expected values. This demonstrated that it is possible to perform the anaerobic digestion (AD) of CBW using a cosubstrate to increase biogas production and biomethane and to improve the quality of the final digestate.


2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 544-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ma ◽  
T. Amano ◽  
M. Enokimoto ◽  
T. Yano ◽  
K.K. Moe ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 286-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline H. Ebner ◽  
Rodrigo A. Labatut ◽  
Jeffrey S. Lodge ◽  
Anahita A. Williamson ◽  
Thomas A. Trabold

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Hong Chen ◽  
Wan-Zhen Yao ◽  
Yan-Ling Ding ◽  
Bin Geng ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 1815-1821 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. El-Mashad ◽  
R. Zhang

1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 0149-0151 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. L. Avery ◽  
G. E. Merva ◽  
J. B. Gerrish

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document