scholarly journals In Vitro Effects of Streptococcus oralis Biofilm on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Cells

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1226
Author(s):  
Alexandra Ingendoh-Tsakmakidis ◽  
Jörg Eberhard ◽  
Christine S. Falk ◽  
Meike Stiesch ◽  
Andreas Winkel

Human gingival epithelial cells (HGEps) and fibroblasts (HGFs) are the main cell types in peri-implant soft tissue. HGEps are constantly exposed to bacteria, but HGFs are protected by connective tissue as long as the mucosa–implant seal is intact. Streptococcus oralis is one of the commensal bacteria, is highly abundant at healthy implant sites, and might modulate soft tissue cells—as has been described for other streptococci. We have therefore investigated the effects of the S. oralis biofilm on HGEps and HGFs. HGEps or HGFs were grown separately on titanium disks and responded to challenge with S. oralis biofilm. HGFs were severely damaged after 4 h, exhibiting transcriptional inflammatory and stress responses. In contrast, challenge with S. oralis only induced a mild transcriptional inflammatory response in HGEps, without cellular damage. HGFs were more susceptible to the S. oralis biofilm than HGEps. The pro-inflammatory interleukin 6 (IL-6) was attenuated in HGFs, as was interleukin 8 (CXCL8) in HGEps. This indicates that S. oralis can actively protect tissue. In conclusion, commensal biofilms can promote homeostatic tissue protection, but only if the implant–mucosa interface is intact and HGFs are not directly exposed.

1989 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick H. Kasten ◽  
L. Fatima R. Pineda ◽  
Paul E. Schneider ◽  
H. Ralph Rawls ◽  
Theda A. Foster

1997 ◽  
Vol 68 (11) ◽  
pp. 1070-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odile M. Carro ◽  
Suvia A. S. Evans ◽  
Cataldo W. Leone

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 1610-1619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hedwich F. Kuipers ◽  
Paula J. Biesta ◽  
Lisette J. Montagne ◽  
Elise S. van Haastert ◽  
Paul van der Valk ◽  
...  

Abstract The chemokine receptor CCR5 is implicated in the pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), atherosclerosis, transplant rejection, and autoimmunity. In previous studies, we have shown that MS lesions are characterized by enhanced expression of transcription factors associated with stress responses, ie, IRF-1, NF-κB, and CREB-1, which modulate expression of both classes of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. The expression of MHC-I and MHC-II molecules greatly overlaps with the expression of CCR5 in MS lesions. Therefore, we investigated whether these factors are also involved in the transcriptional regulation of CCR5. Using in vitro assays, we determined that neither IRF-1 nor NF-κB is involved in the activation of the CCR5 promoter. This is corroborated by the finding that these factors are not involved in the induction of endogenous CCR5 transcription in various cell types. In contrast, we show that CCR5 expression is regulated by the cAMP/CREB pathway and that interference in this pathway affects endogenous CCR5 transcription. From this, we conclude that the cAMP/CREB pathway is involved in the regulation of CCR5 transcription and that, given the ubiquitous nature of CREB-1 protein expression, additional regulatory mechanisms must contribute to cell type-specific expression of CCR5.


Toxins ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Xiaogang Wang ◽  
Paul F. Koffi ◽  
Olivia F. English ◽  
Jean C. Lee

Staphylococcus aureus generates and releases extracellular vesicles (EVs) that package cytosolic, cell-wall associated, and membrane proteins, as well as glycopolymers and exoproteins, including alpha hemolysin, leukocidins, phenol-soluble modulins, superantigens, and enzymes. S. aureus EVs, but not EVs from pore-forming toxin-deficient strains, were cytolytic for a variety of mammalian cell types, but EV internalization was not essential for cytotoxicity. Because S. aureus is subject to various environmental stresses during its encounters with the host during infection, we assessed how these exposures affected EV production in vitro. Staphylococci grown at 37 °C or 40 °C did not differ in EV production, but cultures incubated at 30 °C yielded more EVs when grown to the same optical density. S. aureus cultivated in the presence of oxidative stress, in iron-limited media, or with subinhibitory concentrations of ethanol, showed greater EV production as determined by protein yield and quantitative immunoblots. In contrast, hyperosmotic stress or subinhibitory concentrations of erythromycin reduced S. aureus EV yield. EVs represent a novel S. aureus secretory system that is affected by a variety of stress responses and allows the delivery of biologically active pore-forming toxins and other virulence determinants to host cells.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document