scholarly journals Development of Rock Embedded Drilled Shaft Resistance Factors in Korea based on Field Tests

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 2201
Author(s):  
Seok Jung KIM ◽  
Sun Yong KWON ◽  
Jin Tae HAN ◽  
Mintaek YOO
Keyword(s):  
Design Method ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Load Test ◽  
Drilled Shaft ◽  
Displacement Curve ◽  
Base Resistance ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Shaft Resistance ◽  
The Us

Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) is a limit state design method that has been applied worldwide. Because the data for determining LRFD factors in Korea has been insufficient, the resistance factors suggested by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) in the US have been used for design in Korea; however, these resistance factors were defined based on the characteristics of the predominant bedrock types in the U.S. As such, it remains necessary to determine resistance factors that reflect the bedrock conditions in Korea. Accordingly, in this study, LRFD resistance factors were determined using 13 sets of drilled shaft load test data. To obtain accurate resistance factors, calibration of the elastic modulus of the drilled shaft and the equivalent load–displacement curve considering the axial load and elastic settlement was conducted. After determining accurate resistance values, a reliability analysis was performed. The resistance factors were determined to be within 0.13–0.32 of the AASHTO factors for the shaft resistance, 0.19–0.29 for the base resistance, and 0.28–0.42 for the total resistance. This is equivalent to being 30–60% of the AASHTO-recommended values for the shaft resistance and 40–60% of the AASHTO-recommended values for the base resistance. These differences in resistance factors were entirely the result of discrepancies in the conditions of the rock in the US and Korea in which the shafts were founded.

scholarly journals Load and resistance factor design of drilled shafts subjected to lateral loading at service limit state

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Minh Dinh Uong
Keyword(s):  
Limit State ◽  
Design Procedure ◽  
Drilled Shafts ◽  
Resistance Factor ◽  
Lateral Loading ◽  
Drilled Shaft ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Service Limit State ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor ◽  
Aashto Lrfd

Since 2007, the American Association of State Highway Administration Officials (AASHTO) has made utilization of Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) mandatory on all federally-funded new bridge projects (AASHTO, 2007). However, currently, there are no guidelines implementing LRFD techniques for design of drilled shaft subjected to lateral loads using reliability-based analysis. On a national level, the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO, 2012) specify that a resistance factor of 1.0 be used for design of drilled shafts subjected to lateral loading at service limit state, which means reliability-based analyses for calibration of resistance factors have not been performed. Therefore, there is a need to create a LRFD procedure for drilled shafts subjected to lateral loading at service limit state that has reliability-based calibrated resistance factors applicable for future projects. The research focuses on the reliability-based analysis of drilled shaft subjected to lateral loading, characterize lateral load transfer model of drilled shafts in shale, probabilistic calibrate resistance factor and contribute to the development of design procedure using LRFD. The objective of this work is to improve the design of drilled shaft subjected to lateral loading using LRFD at service limit state by providing a more reliable design procedure than the current AASHTO LRFD procedure for drilled shafts subjected to lateral loading at service limit state.

Evaluation of peak side resistance for rock socketed shafts in weak sedimentary rock from an extensive database of published field load tests: a limit state approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 1816-1831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pouyan Asem ◽  
Paolo Gardoni
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Deformation Modulus ◽  
Load Test ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Strength Limit ◽  
Side Resistance ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor

This paper presents analyses of the measured peak side resistance of rock sockets constructed in weak claystone, shale, limestone, siltstone, and sandstone. The peak side resistance is obtained from in situ axial load tests on drilled shafts, anchors, and plugs. The parameters that affect the development of peak side resistance are determined using in situ load test data. It is found that peak side resistance increases with the unconfined compressive strength and deformation modulus of the weak rock, and decreases with the increase in length of the shear surface along the rock socket sidewalls. The increase in socket diameter also slightly decreases the peak side resistance. Additionally, it is found that the initial normal stresses do not significantly affect the measured peak side resistance in the in situ load tests. The in situ load test data are used to develop an empirical design equation for determination of the peak side resistance. The proposed model for peak side resistance and the reliability analysis are used to determine the corresponding resistance factors for use in the load and resistance factor design framework for assessment of the strength limit state.

Resistance Factors at Serviceability Limit State Using the Texas Cone Penetrometer as the Predictive Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rozbeh Moghaddam
Keyword(s):  
Limit State ◽  
Drilled Shafts ◽  
Load Test ◽  
Deep Foundations ◽  
Driven Piles ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Serviceability Limit State ◽  
First Order Second Moment ◽  
Texas Cone Penetrometer ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor

This study presents the development and calibration of resistance factors for the serviceability limit state (SLS) condition (φSLS) used in the load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of deep foundations. The performance function was established based on load corresponding to tolerable displacement (Qδtol) and design load (Qd). A dataset of published full-scale load tests including projects from Texas, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico was compiled and consisted of 60 load test cases comprising 33 driven piles and 27 drilled shafts. Resistance factors for SLS conditions were calibrated for tolerable displacements using both the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and the First Order Second Moment (FOSM) approaches. From the calibration study, resistance factors at SLS conditions were obtained ranging from 0.33 to 0.62 using FOSM method and 0.37 to 0.67 using the MCS for driven piles. In the case of drilled shafts, SLS resistance factors ranged from 0.37 to 0.77 following the FOSM method and 0.41 to 0.86 based on MCS.

scholarly journals Field Tests of Super-Long and Large-Diameter Drilled Shaft Pile Foundations

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Peisen Wang ◽  
Hongyan Ding ◽  
Jialin Zhou ◽  
Wenjun Hu ◽  
Xuechen Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Load Transfer ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Soil Layer ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Load Test ◽  
Pile Foundations ◽  
Static Load Test ◽  
Mutual Compensation ◽  
Shaft Resistance ◽  
Pile Diameter

This study investigated the compressive behaviour of super-long pile foundations with large diameters. Three 52 m, 73 m, and 83 m long piles with a diameter of 1500 mm, 1500 mm, and 1800 mm were cast and tested, respectively. Given that large loading was required, an improved compressive static load test was introduced, and the load transfer mechanism, shaft resistance development, and distribution were analysed. This study found that the transferred load decreased along the pile during each applied load, but the gradients were different. For most layers, when increasing the load, the shaft resistance developed in the upper layers first, while the shaft resistance from the lower part did not always fully develop. Moreover, the “mutual compensation” phenomenon was discovered, which was when the shaft softening occurred from one soil layer, the shaft hardening of the other soil would occur simultaneously. Under consideration of the soil layer differences around these piles, it was recommended that shaft and base grouting should be applied on 52 m and 73 m piles, while only shaft grouting should be applied on the 83 m pile. For this longest pile design, whose toe resistance was discovered to be very small, increasing the pile length was not appropriate; thus, it was preferable to increase the pile diameter to increase the ultimate bearing capacity.

scholarly journals Research on Improving the Durability of Bridge Pavement Using a High-Modulus Asphalt Mixture

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1449
Author(s):  
Wenfeng Wang ◽  
Shaochan Duan ◽  
Haoran Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Construction Industry ◽  
Mechanical Response ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Asphalt Mixture ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Bottom Layer ◽  
High Modulus ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Depth Prediction ◽  
Pavement Structure

In order to improve the durability of the asphalt pavement on a cement concrete bridge, this study investigated the effect of the modulus of the asphalt mixture at the bottom layer on the mechanical response of bridge pavement, along with a type of emerging bridge pavement structure. In addition, the design method and pavement performance of a high-modulus asphalt mixture were investigated using laboratory and field tests, and the life expectancy of the deck pavement structure was predicted based on the rutting deformation. The results showed that the application of a high-modulus asphalt mixture as the bottom asphalt layer decreased the stress level of the pavement structure. The new high-modulus asphalt mixture displayed excellent comprehensive performance, i.e., the dynamic stability reached 9632 times/mm and the fatigue life reached 1.65 million cycles. Based on the rutting depth prediction, using high-modulus mixtures for the bridge pavement prolonged the service life from the original 5 years to 10 years, which significantly enhanced the durability of the pavement structure. These research results could be of potential interest for practical applications in the construction industry.

scholarly journals Point Load Test of Half-Cylinder Core Using the Numerical Model and Laboratory Tests: Size Suggestion and Correlation with Cylinder Core

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengyu Ren ◽  
Huan Liu ◽  
Rongxing He ◽  
Guanghui Li ◽  
Yang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Model ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Point Load ◽  
Diameter Ratio ◽  
Load Test ◽  
Index Test ◽  
Point Load Test ◽  
Calculation Procedures

The point load test (PLT) is intended as an index test for rock strength classification or estimations of other strength parameters because it is economical and simple to conduct in the laboratory and in field tests. In the literature, calculation procedures for cylinder cores, blocks, or irregular lumps can be found, but no study has researched such procedures for half-cylinder cores. This paper presents the numerical model and laboratory tests for half-cylinder and cylinder specimens. The results for half-cylinder and cylinder specimens are then presented, analysed, and discussed. A correlation of failure load between half-cylinder and cylinder specimens is established with a suitable size suggestion and correction factor. It is found that the failure load becomes stable when half-cylinder specimens have a length/diameter ratio higher than 0.9. In addition, the results show that the point load strength index (PLSI) of half-cylinder cores can be calculated using the calculation procedures for diametral testing on cylinder cores, and it is necessary to satisfy the conditions that the length/diameter ratio be higher than 0.9 and the failure load be multiplied by 0.8.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document