scholarly journals A Scoping Review of Tailored Self-management Interventions among Adults with Mobility Impairing Neurological and Musculoskeletal Conditions

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Plow ◽  
Sabrina Mangal ◽  
Kathryn Geither ◽  
Meghan Golding
PM&R ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Plow ◽  
Marcia Finlayson ◽  
Maggie Rezac

Arthritis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shabana Amanda Ali ◽  
Kristina M. Kokorelias ◽  
Joy C. MacDermid ◽  
Marita Kloseck

Systematic reviews of self-management programs for osteoarthritis suggest minimal evidence of benefit and indicate substantial heterogeneity in interventions. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the nature of self-management interventions provided to patients with osteoarthritis focusing on the inclusion and type of education and social support components. We searched PsycINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases from 1990 to 2016 to identify studies addressing community-based management strategies for osteoarthritis that included aspects of disease-specific education and ongoing social support. Results are presented as a narrative synthesis to facilitate integration of diverse evidence. Data were extracted from 23 studies that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, describing complex, multicomponent interventions for osteoarthritis. All studies included education components, and 18 of these were osteoarthritis-specific. Social support was most often offered through peers and health care professionals, but also through exercise trainers/instructors and researchers, and lasted between 5 and 52 weeks. We charted positive social interaction offered by peers in group settings and emotional/informational support offered by health care professionals. Overall, descriptions of self-management provided limited documentation of the rationale or content of the programs. This suggests that more precise definitions of the theoretical underpinnings, components, and mechanisms would be useful for greater insight into best practices for osteoarthritis self-management programs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1067-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Richardson ◽  
Adalberto Loyola-Sanchez ◽  
Susanne Sinclair ◽  
Jocelyn Harris ◽  
Lori Letts ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 7512515324p1
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B. Albritton ◽  
Josephine Fish ◽  
Jeffrey Henkel ◽  
Shelby Lee ◽  
Rachel Luttrell ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ena Niño de Guzmán Quispe ◽  
Laura Martínez García ◽  
Carola Orrego Villagrán ◽  
Monique Heijmans ◽  
Rosa Sunol ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena D. Dimova ◽  
Ashleigh Ward ◽  
Vivien Swanson ◽  
Josie M.M. Evans

Background: People’s personal perceptions, or illness representations, of type 2 diabetes can act as barriers to successful self-management. </P><P> Introduction: Understanding patients’ subjective perceptions of type 2 diabetes can aid the design of evidence-based care and appropriate educational programmes. This scoping review provides a narrative account of previous knowledge of patients’ illness representations of type 2 diabetes. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative studies that explored patients’ illness representations of type 2 diabetes, as defined by Leventhal’s Common Sense Model, were included. Results: Thirty four studies were identified for this review, but only 14 studies were carried out in a general population of people with diabetes. Illness representations varied across study populations. While it is clear that the perceptions of ethnic minorities and marginalised groups are embedded in their historical and cultural backgrounds, it is also important to understand the views of the wider population. Conclusion: The review highlights the need for self-management interventions to reflect the target population’s representations of type 2 diabetes in order to inform interventions and clinical practice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. RPO.S12339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Froehlich-Grobe ◽  
Simon J. Driver ◽  
Katherine D. Sanches

Introduction This focused review examines the use and effectiveness of self-management strategies in preventing or managing pain, which is among the most common secondary conditions faced by individuals with a mobility disability. Methods This focused review was part of a two-phase comprehensive scoping review. Phase I was a comprehensive scoping review of the literature targeting multiple outcomes of self-management interventions for those with mobility impairment, and Phase II was a focused review of the literature on self-management interventions that target pain as a primary or secondary outcome. Two authors searched CINAHL, PubMed, and PsyclNFO for papers published from January 1988 through August 2014 using specified search terms. Following the scoping review, the authors independently screened and selected the studies and reviewed the eligible studies, and the first author extracted data from the included studies. Results The scoping review yielded 40 studies that addressed pain self-management interventions for those living with mobility impairment. These 40 accumulated papers revealed a heterogeneous evidence base in terms of setting (clinic, community, and online), target populations, intervention duration (3 weeks to 24 months), and mode (health-care providers and lay leaders). Most of the reviewed studies reported that the self-management intervention led to significant reduction of pain over time, suggesting that self-management may be a promising approach for addressing pain experienced by people who live with mobility limitations. Discussion This review also reveals moderate-to-high bias across studies, and findings indicate that future research should enhance the methodological quality to provide stronger evidence about the effectiveness of self-management strategies for reducing pain among those with mobility impairments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document