scholarly journals Trust and mindreading in adolescents: the moderating role of social value orientation

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Derks ◽  
Manon A. Van Scheppingen ◽  
Nikki C. Lee ◽  
Lydia Krabbendam
Keyword(s):  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Moderating Role

scholarly journals Peer Relationships and College Students’ Cooperative Tendencies: Roles of Interpersonal Trust and Social Value Orientation

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaofeng Wang ◽  
Weiwei Hu
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Peer Relationships ◽  
Interpersonal Trust ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

The current study investigated the relationship between peer relationships and cooperative tendencies in college students, and explored the mediating role of interpersonal trust and the moderating role of social value orientation in that relationship. A questionnaire was distributed to 406 college students, and the results showed that: (1) peer relationships significantly positively predicted cooperative tendencies; (2) interpersonal trust partially mediated the relationship between peer relationships and cooperative tendencies; and (3) social value orientation moderated the relationship between peer relationships and cooperative tendencies. In particular, prosocial college students were more susceptible to peer relationships than pro-self college students. The findings of the current study indicated that college students with good peer relationships and prosocial value orientation are more likely to show the willingness to cooperate.

Individuele verschillen in graaigedrag

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maaike Jongenelen ◽  
Roos Vonk
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
High Power ◽  
Role Playing ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Equal Share ◽  
Power Scale ◽  
Role Playing Game

Individual differences in money-grabbing: The role of entitlement, social value orientation, and misuse of power Individual differences in money-grabbing: The role of entitlement, social value orientation, and misuse of power M. Jongenelen & R. Vonk, Gedrag & Organisatie, volume 20, November 2007, nr. 4, pp. 369-381 This research investigates the role of individual differences in money-grabbing. Feelings of entitlement, high scores on the Misuse of Power scale and a pro-self focus were expected to lead to grabbing behaviour in high-power individuals. While playing a manager in a role-playing game, participants had the opportunity to grab more valuable points then their equal share. Results showed that pro-self participants grabbed more than pro-socials. Among the pro-self participants, feelings of entitlement led to higher Misuse of Power scores which, in turn, led to more grabbing. Entitlement en Misuse of Power had no effect on grabbing in pro-socials. It is concluded that power does not corrupt absolutely: Individual differences predict how a powerful person will behave. Implications for business settings are dealt with in the discussion.

How Incomplete Information of Team Member Contributions Affects Subsequent Contributions: The Moderating Role of Social Value Orientation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler F. Thomas ◽  
Todd A. Thornock
Keyword(s):  
Team Member ◽  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Input Information ◽  
Team Project ◽  
Types Of Information ◽  
Output Information

In this study, we investigate how team members' social value orientation (SVO) affects their contributions to a team project when different types of information about other team members' effort is known. Specifically, we examine the team contributions made by proselfs and prosocials after they learn either the input provided or output achieved by other team members. Proselfs subsequently contributed less following input information compared to output information because they can use input information opportunistically to justify their own lower contributions. Conversely, prosocials contributed more after receiving input information compared to output information because they perceive input information as being more psychologically meaningful. Finally, proself teams with output information perform similarly to prosocial teams with either type of information. These findings provide insight into how information about team member contributions and SVO affect individuals' subsequent team contributions, and how output information can help mitigate proselfs' free-riding tendencies and improve team performance.

Aggression as a Motive for Gossip During Conflict: The Role of Power, Social Value Orientation, and Counterpart's Behavior

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emile Jeuken ◽  
Bianca Beersma ◽  
Femke S. ten Velden ◽  
Maria T. M. Dijkstra
Keyword(s):  
Value Orientation ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Value Orientation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document