scholarly journals Asset Bubbles and Endogenous Growth

10.3386/w4004 ◽  
1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Yanagawa ◽  
Gene Grossman
1993 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene M. Grossman ◽  
Noriyuki Yanagawa

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 406-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Hirano ◽  
Noriyuki Yanagawa

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (06) ◽  
pp. 2338-2359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kizuku Takao

By considering a simple endogenous growth model, we propose a new theoretical channel through which the presence of asset bubbles can promote economic growth. In the model economy, long-lived value-maximizing firms continuously improve the quality of their specific products through in-house research and development (R&D), while simultaneously new firms enter into the market. The key feature is endogenous market structure: The number of firms is endogenously determined, which leads to variation in firm size measured in terms of the scale of production at the level of an individual firm. The presence of asset bubbles unambiguously gives rise to larger firms. This allows in-house R&D expenditure to be spread over the greater numbers of goods that the firms produce, which can increase incentives to undertake in-house R&D.


2001 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Hyun Park ◽  
Apostolis Philippopoulos

2006 ◽  
pp. 71-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Rozmainsky

The article examines the issues concerning links between institutional economics, Post Keynesian economics, models of endogenous growth and transition economics. The author considers interrelations between ineffective institutional environment, too high degree of fundamental uncertainty, investor myopia and resulting decrease in investment and "negative" growth in Russia’s transitional economy.


2006 ◽  
pp. 19-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Rozmainsky

The paper considers basic perspectives of post-Keynesian macroeconomics. The author describes post-Keynesian views on theories of durables choice, endogenous money, financial fragility, hysteresis, conflict inflation and endogenous growth. The paper shows distinctions of post-Keynesian approach from both neoclassical tradition and other branches of Keynesianism. The author examines links between post-Keynesian macroeconomics and macroeconomics of Keynes. The paper also considers post-Keynesian views on economic policy and analyzes the relevance of post-Keynesian approach for the post-Soviet Russian economy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document