scholarly journals Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Holland
2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 1019-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Antoniou ◽  
Panos Hatzipanayotou ◽  
Phoebe Koundouri

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 1619-1646
Author(s):  
Morakinyo O. Adetutu ◽  
Thomas G. Weyman-Jones

Abstract Fuel subsidies distort end-use prices below cost, resulting in overconsumption and huge environmental cost. On the other hand, the mark-up over cost due to the exercise of market power results in the social loss of consumer surplus. We open a new line of inquiry into the potential for a market-based solution from these two countervailing forces: can the two offsetting distortions conceivably achieve a second- best optimum? Relying on dynamic panel techniques and gasoline market data for 68 developing countries, we uncover an excessive second-best subsidy offset to market power mark-up on the order of 4.5. Our results indicate that the potential for policy failure strongly exceeds the potential for market failure in our model, and gasoline prices across our sample may not be aligned with vigorous anti-climate change policy.


Author(s):  
Fabio Antoniou ◽  
Panos Hatzipanayotou ◽  
Phoebe Koundouri

Author(s):  
Kevin D. Frick ◽  
Michael E. Chernew

This article examines the welfare consequences of moral hazard, and brings together several arguments suggesting that, in many cases, the additional consumption associated with health insurance could be welfare enhancing. Since conditions for maximum economic efficiency fail to hold in the market for medical care, the theory of the second best is useful. We focus on three efficiency-related reasons why insurance-induced consumption may improve welfare: 1) insurance can offset market power; 2) insurance can remedy some externalities; and 3) insurance can mitigate problems that are associated with misinformation and result in the underutilization of many types of care. These arguments strengthen the case for expanding coverage.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (16) ◽  
pp. 15-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henriette W. Langdon ◽  
Terry Irvine Saenz

The number of English Language Learners (ELL) is increasing in all regions of the United States. Although the majority (71%) speak Spanish as their first language, the other 29% may speak one of as many as 100 or more different languages. In spite of an increasing number of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who can provide bilingual services, the likelihood of a match between a given student's primary language and an SLP's is rather minimal. The second best option is to work with a trained language interpreter in the student's language. However, very frequently, this interpreter may be bilingual but not trained to do the job.


1978 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNA-BETH DOYLE
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document