scholarly journals Newly settled sea urchins in a kelp bed and urchin barren ground, a comparison of growth and mortality

1990 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 229-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
RJ Rowley
1976 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1015-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wheeler J. North

Giant kelp (Macrocystis spp.) occurs as extensive beds along the coasts of Baja California and California. The kelp beds form desirable habitat for fishes and invertebrates. The kelp plants are harvested and processed to produce food additives and chemicals. Many Califorman kelp beds have dwindled or disappeared since 1940. We have developed a number of aquacultural techniques to reverse trends of deterioration. One important cause of kelp bed damage can arise from grazing by sea urchins or herbivorous fishes. Urchins can be controlled by quicklime or by crushing the animals with hammers. Fishes can be controlled by netting. In areas where kelp is sparse or has disappeared, stands can be recreated by transplantation techniques. Where reproductive processes are not adequate to maintain a stable population, mass cultures of microscopic gametophytes and sporophytes can be introduced.


1981 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1339-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Wharton ◽  
K. H. Mann

Relationships between percentage cover of macroalgae, population structure of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis), and the history of the lobster fishery were examined at nine sites distributed along the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia from Guysborough County in the northeast to Pubnico in the southwest. At Pubnico there was dense algal cover and a small number of urchins living in crevices, and at Cape Sable there was an area of transition, but at all other sites there were urchin-dominated barren grounds. When the population structure of the urchins was compared with that previously observed in St. Margaret's Bay before, during, and after destruction of beds of kelp (Laminaria spp. and Agarum) by overgrazing, it was concluded that kelp bed destruction occurred on the coast north of Halifax prior to 1970, and on the coast south of Halifax after 1970. From the records of American lobster (Homarus americanus) catches it was concluded that a critical decline in catches at each site occurred a few years after kelp bed destruction. Information from various sources is synthesized into a coherent theory of the relationship between lobsters, other predators, sea urchins, and kelp.Key words: lobsters, Homarus americanus; sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis; destructive grazing, kelp, Laminaria, Agarum


1982 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 636-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. Drummond-Davis ◽  
K. H. Mann ◽  
R. A. Pottle

The population density of rock crabs (Cancer irroratus) in a kelp bed on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia was examined by mark–recapture techniques and found to be about one crab (> 45-mm carapace width) per 2 square metres. Prey taken by the crabs included hermit crabs (Pagurus), mussels (Mytilus), sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus), and various small crustaceans and polychaetes. It was concluded that the crab population would exert a strong predation pressure on these invertebrates.Key words: Cancer irroratus, rock crabs, predation, population density, kelp


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kindall A. Murie ◽  
Paul E. Bourdeau

AbstractGlobally, kelp forests are threatened by multiple stressors, including increasing grazing by sea urchins. With coastal upwelling predicted to increase in intensity and duration in the future, understanding whether kelp forest and urchin barren urchins are differentially affected by upwelling-related stressors will give insight into how future conditions may affect the transition between kelp forests and barrens. We assessed how current and future-predicted changes in the duration and magnitude of upwelling-associated stressors (low pH, dissolved oxygen, and temperature) affected the performance of purple sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) sourced from rapidly-declining bull kelp (Nereocystis leutkeana) forests and nearby barrens and maintained on habitat-specific diets. Kelp forest urchins were of superior condition to barrens urchins, with ~ 6–9 times more gonad per body mass. Grazing and condition in kelp forest urchins were more negatively affected by distant-future and extreme upwelling conditions, whereas grazing and survival in urchins from barrens were sensitive to both current-day and all future-predicted upwelling, and to increases in acidity, hypoxia, and temperature regardless of upwelling. We conclude that urchin barren urchins are more susceptible to increases in the magnitude and duration of upwelling-related stressors than kelp forest urchins. These findings have important implications for urchin population dynamics and their interaction with kelp.


Author(s):  
Sheanna M. Brady ◽  
Robert E. Scheibling

Repopulation by green sea urchins Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis of a steeply sloping rock bottom was monitored at a wave-exposed headland (Chebucto Head) following a disease outbreak that caused mass mortality in September 1999. Density and size of urchins were sampled in four depth strata: at 8–10 m in an urchin grazing aggregation (front) along the lower margin of a kelp bed, at 12 m and 16 m on a bedrock ramp, and at 24 m on a cobble and boulder field where urchins were unaffected by the disease. Shoreward migration of adults along the ramp from the surviving population at 24 m was the primary means of repopulation, which was augmented by recruitment via planktonic larvae. At 16 m, urchin density stabilized (at ∼50 urchins m−2) within six months of the die-off while repopulation at 12 m took more than eight months. A grazing front of large urchins (40–60 mm, test diameter) had formed along the lower edge of a kelp bed by January 2002, which reached densities of up to 284 urchins m−2. Video surveys at Chebucto Head and two adjacent locations of similar bathymetry revealed an extensive urchin population between 25 and 55 m depth, with a mean density on rocky substrata of 73 urchins m−2.


2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 1415-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto A. Uribe ◽  
Marco Ortiz ◽  
Aldo S. Pacheco ◽  
Rubén Araya

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document