GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DAN KINERJA KEUANGAN PERUSAHAAN FOOD AND BEVERAGE

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Viora Doreke Alvilika ◽  
Siti Nurlaela ◽  
Yuli Chomsatu Samrotun

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of good corporate governance on the company's financial performance. The population used in this study were food and beverage companies listed on the IDX during the study year period 2013-2017. The sampling used in this study is to use a purposive sampling method which is obtained by 16 food and beverage companies with the period of the 2013-2017 research year. The variables used in this study are managerial ownership, institutional ownership, independent commissioners, board of commissioners, and committee size as independent variables, while financial performance with return on assets (ROA) as the dependent variable. The analytical tool used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis which is used to test the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable. In the results of this study indicate that managerial ownership variables, institutional ownership, board of commissioners and the size of the audit committee have no effect on financial performance return on assets, only independent commissioner variables have an effect on financial performance.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Retno Ryani Kusumawati ◽  
Indra Sulistiana

This study was conducted to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on Financial Performance and Company Value in State-Owned Corporation in Indonesia in the era of 4.0 and society 5.0. Research subjects are state-owned corporation listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2013-2017 period. The samples taken are 10 State-Owned Corporation (BUMN) that are included in the criteria. The method used to analyze the relationship between variables in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. Hypothesis test results show that the Independent Board of Commissioners and Audit Committee have an effect on the Return on Assets (ROA) with a significance value of 0.012. The results of testing the second hypothesis Independent commissioners and audit committees have no simultaneous effect on Company Values with a significance value of 0.082. Partially the independent Board of Commissioners has an effect on Return On Assets (ROA) and company value. While the second variable of the Audit Committee does not affect the Return on Assets (ROA) and company value.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 645-655
Author(s):  
Celine Eriskha ◽  
Nanu Hasanuh

When observing the major financial problems that were revealed, the public questioned the performance of the big companies involved in this scandal, which contradicts the principles of Good Corporate Governance regarding accountability, equity, integrity, transparency and responsibility. This study aims to determine, test and explain the effect of the audit committee, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, on Return On Assets both partially and jointly in the food and beverage sub-sector manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014 to 2019. The sample was determined by purposive sampling. Data collection techniques using literature study and observation. The method used is multiple linear regression analysis. Based on the results of multiple linear analysis, it is found that Managerial ownership has a partial effect on ROA then Audit Committee Size and Institutional ownership partially have no effect on ROA, and simultaneously Audit Committee Size, Managerial Ownership and Institutional Ownership together have an effect on Return On Assets ( ROA). Keywords: Audit Committee, Managerial Ownership, Institutional and ROA


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-27
Author(s):  
Rani Aprilian ◽  
Kiagus Andi ◽  
Yunia Amelia

This study aims to examine the effect of profitability and good corporate governance on earnings quality in food and beverage companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 2015-2018 period. Profitability is calculated using Return on Assets (ROA). The proxy of Good Corporate Governance are institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, and independent commissioner. The dependent variable in this study is earnings quality measured by discretionary accrual using Modified Jones Model to detect earning management. This study used secondary data from the official website of Indonesian Stock Exchange (www.idx.co.id) and the sampling method in this study uses purposive sampling method. The data analysis in this study using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that profitability and audit committee have a positive effect on earnings quality, while the independent commissioner has a negative effect on earnings quality. Other independent variables i.e. institutional ownership and managerial ownership have no significant effect on earnings quality


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Natalia Natalia ◽  
Herlina Lusmeida

<p>The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of good corporate governance on stock returns. Return is the level of profit obtained by investors on investment activities. Good corporate governance used in this study is an independent board of commissioners, audit committee, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership. This research was conducted using the annual report documentation method of banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2016 to 2019. The sampling method in this study was purposive sampling with the number of samples obtained is 106 samples. Data processing is done by quantitative method using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the study show that the audit committee and institutional ownership have a negative and significant effect on stock returns, while independent commissioners and managerial ownership have no effect on stock returns.<em></em></p><p><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRAK</strong></p><p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh <em>good corporate governance</em> terhadap pengembalian saham. <em>Return</em> adalah tingkat keuntungan yang diperoleh investor atas kegiatan investasi. <em>Good corporate governance </em>yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dewan komisaris independen, komite audit, kepemilikan manajerial dan kepemilikan institusional. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode dokumentasi laporan tahunan perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) 2016–2019. Metode pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah <em>purposive sampling</em> dengan jumlah sampel yang diperoleh sebanyak 106 sampel. Pengolahan data dilakukan dengan metode kuantitatif dengan menggunakan analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan variabel komite audit dan kepemilikan institusional berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap <em>return</em> saham, sedangkan dewan komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak berpengaruh terhadap <em>return</em> saham.</p><p><strong><br /></strong></p>


AKUNTABILITAS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-154
Author(s):  
Jefri Jefri ◽  
Yaumil Khoiriyah

The objective of this research was to prove empirically the factors affecting the good corporate governance and the return on assets onthe tax avoidance of the manufacturing companies indexed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period of 2014-2016. The independent variables of this research werethe institutional ownership, the managerial ownership, the proportion of independent board of Commissioners, the audit committee, the audit quality, the return on assets; while, the dependent variable of this research wasthe tax avoidance. The data collectingtechnique used in this research was the purposive sampling. The number of sample used in this research was 57 manufacturing companies indexed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2016. The data analysis technique used in this research was the multiple linear regressionby using IBM SPSS Version 20 program. The result of this research showed that the managerial ownership, the audit quality, and the return on assets affected the tax avoidance; while, the institutional ownership, the proportion of independent board of commissioners, and theaudit committee did not have any effect on the tax avoidance


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodhiyani Cahya Ningsih ◽  
Dian Retnaningdiah

this study was to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Financial Performance as measured by Return on Assets (ROA) in financial companies listed on the IDX in the period of 2014-2018. This study used a Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. The independent variable of the research used GCG as proxied by the Board of Directors, Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, and the Audit Committee, while CSR is measured using indicators based on the 2016 Global Reporting Inititive (GRI) Standard. Financial performance as measured by Return on Assets (ROA). Sampling data using purposive sampling, and there are 11 companies that meet predetermined criteria. This study showed that the Managerial Ownership has an effect on Financial Performance (ROA). This is shown as hypothesized. The Board of Directors, the Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Institutional Ownership, the Audit Committee do not affect the Financial Performance (ROA), this is not as hypothesized. CSR has no effect on Financial Performance (ROA), this is not what was hypothesized. The Board of Directors, Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Audit Committee and CSR simultaneously affect Financial Performance (ROA). These results meet the hypotheses of the study.   Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Performance


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nurkholis Muhammad ◽  
Damayanti Damayanti

This study is conducted to examine the effect of good corporate governance on financial performance. The variables used in this study are the board of commissioners, the board of directors, institutional ownership and the audit committee as independent variables, while the dependent variable is financial performance proxies with ROA. This study uses 14 consistent samples of LQ45 companies that met the sample criteria during 2014 to 2018. The sampling technique in this research is purposive sampling in order to obtain 70 observations. Because the classical assumption test gets problems in the autocorrelation test, the data are transformed using the cochrane orcutt method, so that the total observations become 69 observations. The data analysis technique utilizes multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that the board of commissioners has a positive and significant effect on financial performance, while the board of directors has a significant negative effect on financial performance, and institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on financial performance, while the audit committee has a significant negative effect on financial performance. Based on the determination testing of variable of the board of commissioners, board of directors, institutional ownership and audit committee in the regression model, this study is able to explain the dependent variable of financial performance by 32.9%, while 67.1% is explained by other variables not examined in this study


Author(s):  
Yefni Yefni ◽  
Atika Zarefar ◽  
Arumega Zarefar

Objective - This research aims to identify the effect of good corporate governance ('GCG') factors such as the size of the board, the presence of independent commissioners and audit committees, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership on corporate value (price to book value). This study also uses profitability measured by Return on Assets ('ROA') as moderating variables. Methodology/Technique - The object of this study is plantation companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) between 2011 to 2015. The samples are selected by using purposive sampling method. The hypothesis in this study is tested by using multiple linear regression. Findings - There are three variables that significantly influence corporate value. These are independent commissioners, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership. Moreover, profitability does not moderate the relationship between GCG and company value. Novelty - The research is intended to find a relationship between good corporate governance and firm performance among plantation companies. Type of Paper - Empirical Keywords: Audit Committee; Corporate Values; Good Corporate Governance; Independent Commissioner; Institutional Ownership; Managerial Ownership; Price to Book Value; Return on Assets.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Okta Setiawan ◽  
Iwan Setiadi

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of good corporate governance (GCG) on financial performance using the measurement of return on assets (ROA). The sample of this research is the manufacturing companies in the consumer goods sector which are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The data collection technique used in this study was purpose sampling, which consisted of 154 companies. The analysis of this study uses multiple linear regression analysis methods. The results showed that GCG consisting of independent commissioners had a significant positive effect on financial performance (ROA), independent audit committee had no effect on (ROA), institutional ownership had a significant positive effect on financial performance (ROA), and managerial ownership financial performance (ROA).Keywords: GCG, independent commissioner, independent audit committee, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and financial performance. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indriyani Ningsih Sinurat ◽  
Sylvia Christina Daat ◽  
Linda Y. Hutadjulu

This study aims to examine the influence of good corporate governance and intellectual capital to financial performance (financial performance). Corporate governance mechanisms in this research are managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and the proportion of independentcommissioners. Intellectual capital is measured using Value Added Intellectual Capital (VAIC) model which has three components (physical capital, human capital and structural capital), and financial performance is measured by return on assets (ROA). Secondary data was used by derived from the financial statements of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2016. The sampling technique used purposive sampling method with multiple linear regression analysis tools. Prior the regression test, the classical assumption test is done first. The results show that managerial ownership, institutional ownership and independent commissioner's proportion have no effect on financial performance, while intellectual capital has an effect on financial performance. The conclusion of this research is that intellectual capital can be used to improve financial performance if company can measure accurately but corporate governance still not proven can improve company's financial performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document