scholarly journals PRDM16 Gene

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Prdm16 Gene

scholarly journals The Clinical Features and Prognostic Impact of PRDM16 gene Expression in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5228-5228
Author(s):  
Genki Yamato ◽  
Hiroki Yamaguchi ◽  
Hiroshi Handa ◽  
Norio Shiba ◽  
Satoshi Wakita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Pediatric Aml ◽  
Prdm16 Gene ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a complex disease caused by various genetic alterations. Some prognosis-associated cytogenetic aberrations or gene mutations such as FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD), t(8;21)(q22;q22)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1, and inv(16)(p13q22)/CBFB-MYH11 have been found and used to stratify the risk. Numerous gene mutations have been implicated in the pathogenesis of AML, including mutations of DNMT3A, IDH1/2, TET2 and EZH2 in addition to RAS, KIT, NPM1, CEBPA and FLT3in the recent development of massively parallel sequencing technologies. However, even after incorporating these molecular markers, the prognosis is unclear in a subset of AML patients. Recently, NUP98-NSD1 fusion gene was identified as a poor prognostic factor for AML. We have reported that all pediatric AML patients with NUP98-NSD1 fusion showed high expression of the PR domain containing 16 (PRDM16; also known as MEL1) gene, which is a zinc finger transcription factor located near the breakpoint at 1p36. PRDM16 is highly homologous to MDS1/EVI1, which is an alternatively spliced transcript of EVI1. Furthermore, PRDM16 is essential for hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and remarkable as a candidate gene to induce leukemogenesis. Recent reports revealed that high PRDM16 expression was a significant marker to predict poor prognosis in pediatric AML. However, the significance of PRDM16 expression is unclear in adult AML patients. Methods A total of 151 adult AML patients (136 patients with de novo AML and 15 patients with relapsed AML) were analyzed. They were referred to our institution between 2004 and 2015 and our collaborating center between 1996 and 2013. The median length of follow-up for censored patients was 30.6 months. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed using the 7900HT Fast Real Time PCR System with TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix and TaqMan Gene Expression Assay. In addition to PRDM16, ABL1 was also evaluated as a control gene. We investigated the correlations between PRDM16 gene expression and other genetic alterations, such as FLT3-ITD, NPM1, and DNMT3A, and clarified the prognostic impact of PRDM16 expression in adult AML patients. Mutation analyses were performed by direct sequence analysis, Mutation Biased PCR, and the next-generation sequencer Ion PGM. Results PRDM16 overexpression was identified in 29% (44/151) of adult AML patients. High PRDM16 expression correlated with higher white blood cell counts in peripheral blood and higher blast ratio in bone marrow at diagnosis; higher coincidence of mutation in NPM1 (P = 0.003) and DNMT3A (P = 0.009); and lower coincidence of t(8;21) (P = 0.010), low-risk group (P = 0.008), and mutation in BCOR (P = 0.049). Conversely, there were no significant differences in age at diagnosis and sex distribution. Patients with high PRDM16 expression tended to be low frequency in M2 (P = 0.081) subtype, and the remaining subtype had no significant differences between high and low PRDM16 expression. Remarkably, PRDM16 overexpression patients were frequently observed in non-complete remission (55.8% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.001). Patients with high PRDM16 expression tended to have a cumulative incidence of FLT3-ITD (37% vs. 21%, P = 0.089) and MLL-PTD (15% vs. 5%, P = 0.121). We analyzed the prognosis of 139 patients who were traceable. The overall survival (OS) and median survival time (MST) of patients with high PRDM16 expression were significantly worse than those of patients with low expression (5-year OS, 17% vs. 32%; MST, 287 days vs. 673 days; P = 0.004). This trend was also significant among patients aged <65 years (5-year OS, 25% vs. 48%; MST, 361 days vs. 1565 days, P = 0.013). Moreover, high PRDM16 expression was a significant prognostic factor for FLT3-ITD negative patients aged < 65 years in the intermediate cytogenetic risk group (5-year OS, 29% vs. 58%; MST, 215 days vs. undefined; P = 0.032). Conclusions We investigated the correlations among PRDM16 expression, clinical features, and other genetic alterations to reveal clinical and prognostic significance. High PRDM16 expression was independently associated with non-CR and adverse outcomes in adult AML patients, as well as pediatric AML patients. Our finding indicated that the same pathogenesis may exist in both adult and pediatric AML patients with respect to PRDM16 expression, and measuring PRDM16 expression was a powerful tool to predict the prognosis of adult AML patients. Disclosures Inokuchi: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Sequence variants in the bovine PRDM16 gene associated with body weight in Chinese cattle breeds

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 746-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wang ◽  
C. Wang ◽  
R. Tian ◽  
Y.-Z. Huang ◽  
X.-S. Lai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Sequence Variants ◽  
Cattle Breeds ◽  
Chinese Cattle ◽  
Prdm16 Gene

scholarly journals Association of single nucleotide polymorphism Rs2236518 in PRDM16 gene with BMI in Chinese males

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 710-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Yue ◽  
Jin-wei He ◽  
Yao-hua Ke ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Chun Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphism ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Prdm16 Gene

Novel SNPs in the PRDM16 gene and their associations with performance traits in chickens

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 3153-3160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruili Han ◽  
Yang Wei ◽  
Xiangtao Kang ◽  
Hong Chen ◽  
Guirong Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Traits ◽  
Prdm16 Gene

Two novel SNPs in the coding region of the bovine PRDM16 gene and its associations with growth traits

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 571-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wang ◽  
Z. J. Li ◽  
X. Y. Lan ◽  
L. S. Hua ◽  
Y. T. Huai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Traits ◽  
Coding Region ◽  
Prdm16 Gene

scholarly journals A Combination of EVI1 and PRDM16 Expression Clarified the Clinical Features of Intermediate/High Risk Patients in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1380-1380
Author(s):  
Genki Yamato ◽  
Norio Shiba ◽  
Yusuke Hara ◽  
Myoung-Ja Park ◽  
Manabu Sotomatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Adverse Outcome ◽  
The Other ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Pediatric Aml ◽  
Prdm16 Gene

Abstract Background Several molecular markers, such as FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD), NPM1, CEBPA are well known to correlate with mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recently, a number of gene mutations have been implicated in the pathogenesis of AML, including mutations of DNMT3A, IDH1/2, TET2 and EZH2 in addition to RAS, KIT and FLT3. However, DNMT3A, IDH1/2, and TET2 are rare in pediatric patients with AML, thus accurate risk evaluation remained challenging even after incorporating these molecular markers. On the other hand, overexpression of the EVI1 gene is reported to be associated with adverse outcome in pediatric AML. Moreover, we have previously reported that measuring of PRDM16 gene expression was a powerful tool to predict the prognosis of pediatric AML. PRDM16 gene is highly homologous to the MDS1/EVI1 gene, which is an alternatively spliced transcript of the EVI1 gene. In this study, we investigated EVI1 gene expression to verify the prognosis of EVI1 gene expression and the relationship between EVI1 and PRDM16 gene expression. Methods Between 2006 and 2010, 485 de novo pediatric AML patients participated in the Japanese AML-05 study conducted by the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group (JPLSG). Among them, 116 patients were excluded from the study because of misdiagnosis and unavailability of their RNA samples. Therefore, 369 patients were analyzed. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed in these patients using the 7900HT Fast Real Time PCR System with TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix and TaqMan Gene Expression Assay. In addition to EVI1 and PRDM16, ABL1 was also evaluated as a control gene. We investigated the correlations between these gene expressions and other genetic alterations, and clarified the prognostic impact of EVI1 and association between EVI1 and PRDM16 genes. Results A total of 58 of 369 patients (15.7%) showed high expression of EVI1 gene. Overexpression of EVI1 gene was strongly associated with dismal prognosis; low risk (LR; 1 of 123 patients, or 0.8%); intermediate risk (IR; 38 of 147 patients, or 25.9%); high risk (HR; 6 of 50 patients, or 12%); and non-complete remission (Non-CR; 13 of 49 patients, or 26.5%), (P < 0.001). Overexpression of EVI1 correlated with the following characteristics: younger age at diagnosis; M4, M5, and M7 subtype; higher coincidence of MLL-rearrangement; and lower coincidence of t(8;21), and inv(16). EVI1 overexpression was very frequent among patients with de novo pediatric AML and IR/non-CR groups. Furthermore, more than half of patients in M6 (5 of 8 patients, or 62.5%) were EVI1 high expression. Interestingly, no patients with EVI1 high expression in M7 had a fusion of CBFA2T3-GLIS2. Patients with EVI1 overexpression also more frequently harbored a complex karyotype and monosomy 7. The frequencies of patients with high or low EVI1 expression differed widely with respect to each genetic alteration, as follows: t(8;21), 1% vs 99%, P < 0.001; inv(16), 0% vs 100%, P < 0.001; NUP98-JARID1A, 83% vs 17%, P < 0.001; OTT-MAL, 100% vs 0%, P = 0.02; and KIT, 5% vs 95%, P = 0.003. The overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) among patients with EVI1 high expressions were significantly lower than that among patients without such gene aberrant expression (3-year OS 54% vs. 77%, P=0.008G3-year EFS: 34% vs 58%, P<0.001), respectively. On the other hand, a total of 84 of 369 patients (22.8%) showed high expression of PRDM16 gene. The OS and EFS among PRDM16 overexpressing patients were significantly worse than those among low expression group (3-year OS: 51% vs 81%, P<0.001; 3-year EFS: 32% vs 64%, P<0.001), respectively. Remarkably, concerning 125 patients with high EVI1 and/or PRDM16 expression, their prognosis was much worse than that of patients without these high expression (3-year OS: 54% vs 84%, P<0.001; 3-year EFS: 32% vs 68%, P<0.001) , respectively. Conclusions We investigated EVI1 and PRDM16 gene expression in de novo pediatric AML patients, and their high expression was associated with inferior survival, respectively. We suggest that high EVI1 and/or PRDM16 expression is useful marker for adverse outcome. On the other hand, low EVI1 and PRDM16 expressions are useful to elucidate low risk patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document