scholarly journals Breast Cancer Type 2 Susceptibility Protein

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Breast Cancer Type

scholarly journals A Variant of the Breast Cancer Type 2 Susceptibility Protein (BRC) Repeat Is Essential for the RECQL5 Helicase to Interact with RAD51 Recombinase for Genome Stabilization

2012 ◽  
Vol 287 (28) ◽  
pp. 23808-23818 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nurul Islam ◽  
Nicolas Paquet ◽  
David Fox ◽  
Eloise Dray ◽  
Xiao-Feng Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Genome Stabilization ◽  
Breast Cancer Type

scholarly journals Prominent Prognostic Factors in Aggressive Breast Cancer: A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazem Nejati ◽  
Sedigheh Fekri Aval ◽  
Mohammadreza Alivand ◽  
Abolfazl Akbarzadeh ◽  
AmirAhmad Arabzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Aggressive Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Type

Context: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Hereditary susceptibility created by mutations in autosomal dominant genes is responsible for 5 to 10% of all BC cases in women. Recent studies have identified genes associated with increased risk for aggressive BC, providing the basis for better risk management. Evidence Acquisition: The latest information in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were the main databases for finding articles. A combination of keywords of ‘metastasis’, ‘invasion’, ‘aggressive breast cancer’, ‘prognostic factor’, ‘mutation’, and ‘cancer treatment’ was searched in the databases to identify related articles. Titles and abstracts of the articles were studied to choose the right articles. Results: Mutations in breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) and breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein (BRCA2) genes are two central players related to the high risk of BC. Mutation in tumor protein p53 (TP53) is another important mutation that leads to triple-negative BC. Although the majority of BC types are not associated with high-throughput mutant genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53, they are associated with low-throughput genes, including DNA repair protein Rad50 (RAD50), Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene (NBS1), checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2), BRCA1-interacting protein 1 (BRIP1), E-cadherin gene (CDH1) and PALB2, UCHL1, aldehydedehydrogenase1A3 (ALDH1A3), androgen receptor (AR), 5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PIK3CA), phosphatidylinositol-4, and luminal gene expression that are generally mutated in the global population. High tumor mutational burden (TMB) was associated with improved progression-free survival. Conclusions: The lymph node status, early tumor size, ER, PR, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), and Ki-67 are conventional prognostic factors for BC. However, these factors cannot exactly predict the aggressive behavior of BC. Hence, in this review, we discussed new prognostic factors of aggressive BCs that are useful for the treatment of patients with BC.

scholarly journals Structural basis of homologous recombination

2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yueru Sun ◽  
Thomas J. McCorvie ◽  
Luke A. Yates ◽  
Xiaodong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
Homology Search ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Breast Cancer Type

AbstractHomologous recombination (HR) is a pathway to faithfully repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). At the core of this pathway is a DNA recombinase, which, as a nucleoprotein filament on ssDNA, pairs with homologous DNA as a template to repair the damaged site. In eukaryotes Rad51 is the recombinase capable of carrying out essential steps including strand invasion, homology search on the sister chromatid and strand exchange. Importantly, a tightly regulated process involving many protein factors has evolved to ensure proper localisation of this DNA repair machinery and its correct timing within the cell cycle. Dysregulation of any of the proteins involved can result in unchecked DNA damage, leading to uncontrolled cell division and cancer. Indeed, many are tumour suppressors and are key targets in the development of new cancer therapies. Over the past 40 years, our structural and mechanistic understanding of homologous recombination has steadily increased with notable recent advancements due to the advances in single particle cryo electron microscopy. These have resulted in higher resolution structural models of the signalling proteins ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated), and ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein), along with various structures of Rad51. However, structural information of the other major players involved, such as BRCA1 (breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein) and BRCA2 (breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein), has been limited to crystal structures of isolated domains and low-resolution electron microscopy reconstructions of the full-length proteins. Here we summarise the current structural understanding of homologous recombination, focusing on key proteins in recruitment and signalling events as well as the mediators for the Rad51 recombinase.

scholarly journals Immunohistochemistry for the detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Alves Teixeira ◽  
Francisco Jose Candido dos Reis
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca1 Protein ◽  
Current Usage ◽  
Breast Cancer Type

BackgroundLoss of function in either breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) or breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein (BRCA2) is a major risk factor for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) development. BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficiencies are associated with short-term prognosis and might have importance for the treatment of women with the disease. However, the screening of all possible mechanisms of dysfunction is expensive, time-consuming and difficult to apply in clinical practice. On the other hand, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a simple and reliable method to access the expression of several proteins in tumour tissues.Materials and methodsThis systematic review aims to evaluate the current usage of IHC to detect BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiencies in EOC. We searched and evaluated all primary literature on the use of IHC for evaluating BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins expression in EOC. The main concepts for the search were: ovarian neoplasms, IHC, BRCA1 and BRCA2.ResultsForty-four studies from 925 unique titles were included. A total of 4206 tumour samples were evaluated for BRCA1 and 1041 for BRCA2 expression. Twelve BRCA1 primary antibodies were used in 41 studies, and the most common was the MS110 clone (75.6%). Seven BRCA2 primary antibodies were used in ten studies. Using the cut-off of 10%, 47.0% of EOCs are associated with loss of BRCA1 and 34.5% with the loss of BRCA2 expression.ConclusionIHC was effective to detect loss of BRCA1 protein expression in EOC; however, data on BRCA2 expression were heterogeneous and difficult to interpret.

Pre-operative prediction of invasive vs intraductal breast cancer type: multivariate analysis of the accuracy of clinical and imaging findings

The Breast ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-155
Author(s):  
B. Brancato ◽  
D. Bricolo ◽  
M. Bonzanini ◽  
S. Ciatto ◽  
R. Mariotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Breast Cancer Type
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document