Effects of gymnastics expertise on the perception of body orientation in the pitch dimension

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 251-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Bringoux ◽  
Ludovic Marin ◽  
Vincent Nougier ◽  
Pierre-Alain Barraud ◽  
Christian Raphel
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Motor Skills ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Sensory Cues ◽  
Specific Training ◽  
Pitch Dimension ◽  
Pitch Tilt ◽  
Body Cast

The purpose of this study was to investigate how experts in motor skills requiring a fine postural control perceive their body orientation with few gravity based sensory cues. In Experiment 1, expert gymnasts and controls had to detect their body tilt when pitching at a velocity of 0.05 deg . s − 1 , in two conditions of body restriction (strapped and body cast altering the somatosensory cues). Contrary to the experts, the controls exhibited a larger body tilt when totally restrained in the body cast. In Experiment 2, subjects had to estimate their Subjective Postural Vertical (SPV) starting from different angles of pitch tilt. The controls exhibited significant errors of SPV judgement whereas the experts were very precise. These results suggest that 1) somatosensory cues are more informative than otolithic cues for the perception of body orientation, and 2) the efficiency of otolithic and/or interoceptive inputs can be improved through a specific training to compensate for the lack of somatosensory cues.

scholarly journals Contribution of Somesthetic Information to the Perception of Body Orientation in the Pitch Dimension

2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 909-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Bringoux ◽  
Vincent Nougier ◽  
Ludovic Marin ◽  
Pierre-Alain Barraud ◽  
Christian Raphel
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Vertical Position ◽  
Starting Position ◽  
Pitch Dimension ◽  
Cast Condition ◽  
Static Body ◽  
Body Cast

This study investigated the contribution of otolithic and somesthetic inputs in the perception of body orientation when pitching at very slow velocities. In Experiment 1, the subjects’ task was to indicate their subjective postural vertical, in two different conditions of body restriction, starting from different angles of body tilt. In the “strapped” condition, subjects were attached onto a platform by means of large straps. In the “body cast” condition, subjects were completely immobilized in a depressurized system, which attenuates gravity-based somesthetic cues. Results showed that the condition of body restriction and the initial tilt largely influenced the subjective postural vertical. In Experiment 2, subjects were displaced from a vertical position and had to detect the direction of body tilts. Results showed that the threshold for the perception of body tilt was higher when subjects were immobilized in the body cast and when they were tilted backward. Experiment 3 replicated the same protocol from a supine starting position. Compared to results of Experiment 2, the threshold for the perception of body tilt decreased significantly. Overall, these data suggested that gravity-based somesthetic cues are more informative than otolithic cues for the perception of a quasi-static body orientation.

The Lamprey Postural Circuit

2017 ◽  
pp. 521-526
Author(s):  
Tatiana G. Deliagina ◽  
Pavel V. Zelenin ◽  
Grigory N. Orlovsky
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Control Systems ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Quiescent State ◽  
Gravity Vector ◽  
Vestibular Input ◽  
Motor Responses ◽  
Main Form ◽  
Behavioral States

The lamprey has two principal behavioral states—a quiescent state, when it is attached to the substrate with its sucker mouth; and an active state, when it locomotes. It is capable of several forms of locomotion, but it actively stabilizes its body orientation in space only during the main form, fast forward swimming. During fast forward swimming, orientation of the lamprey in the sagittal (pitch) and transversal (roll) planes is stabilized in relation to the gravity vector by means of the postural control systems driven by vestibular input. Any deviations from the stabilized orientation are reflected in vestibular signals, which cause corrective motor responses. In the pitch and yaw planes, the corrections occur due to the body bending in the corresponding plane. In the roll plane, the corrections occur due to a change in the direction of locomotor body undulations, from lateral to oblique.

Reticulospinal neurons controlling forward and backward swimming in the lamprey

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 1361-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. V. Zelenin
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Motor Coordination ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Firing Frequency ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Locomotor Rhythm ◽  
Reticulospinal Neurons ◽  
Implanted Electrodes

Most vertebrates are capable of two forms of locomotion, forward and backward, strongly differing in the patterns of motor coordination. Basic mechanisms generating these patterns are located in the spinal cord; they are activated and regulated by supraspinal commands. In the lamprey, these commands are transmitted by reticulospinal (RS) neurons. The aim of this study was to reveal groups of RS neurons controlling different aspects of forward (FS) and backward (BS) swimming in the lamprey. Activity of individual larger RS neurons in intact lampreys was recorded during FS and BS by chronically implanted electrodes. It was found that among the neurons activated during locomotion, 27% were active only during FS, 3% only during BS, and 70% during both FS and BS. In a portion of RS neurons, their mean firing frequency was correlated with frequency of body undulations during FS (8%), during BS (34%), or during both FS and BS (22%), suggesting their involvement in control of locomotion intensity. RS activity was phasically modulated by the locomotor rhythm during FS (20% of neurons), during BS (29%), or during both FS and BS (16%). The majority of RS neurons responding to vestibular stimulation (and presumably involved in control of body orientation) were active mainly during FS. This explains the absence of stabilization of the body orientation observed during BS. We discuss possible functions of different groups of RS neurons, i.e., activation of the spinal locomotor CPG, inversion of the direction of propagation of locomotor waves, and postural control.

scholarly journals Neck Muscle Vibration and Spatial Orientation During Stepping in Place in Humans

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 2232-2241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Bove ◽  
Gregoire Courtine ◽  
Marco Schieppati
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Neck Muscle ◽  
Body Rotation ◽  
Erect Posture ◽  
Proprioceptive Input ◽  
Neck Muscle Vibration ◽  
Stepping In Place

Unilateral long-lasting vibration was applied to the sternomastoid muscle to assess the influence of asymmetric neck proprioceptive input on body orientation during stepping-in-place. Blindfolded subjects performed 3 sequences of 3 trials, each lasting 60 s: control, vibration applied during stepping (VDS), and vibration applied before stepping (VBS). VDS caused clear-cut whole body rotation toward the side opposite to vibration. The body rotated around a vertical axis placed at about arm's length from the body. The rotation did not begin immediately on switching on the vibrator. The delay varied from subject to subject from a few seconds to about 10 s. Once initiated, the angular velocity of rotation was remarkably constant (about 1°/s). In VBS, at the beginning of stepping, subjects rotated for a while as if their neck were still vibrated. At a variable delay, the direction of rotation reversed, and the effects were opposite to those observed during VDS. Under no condition did head rotation, head roll, or lateral body tilt accompany rotation. The results confirm and extend the notion that the neck proprioceptive input plays a major role in body orientation during locomotion. The body rotation does not seem to depend on the same mechanisms that modify the erect posture; rather, the asymmetric neck input would seem to modify the egocentric body-centered coordinate system.

Lateropulsion After Hemispheric Stroke: A Form of Spatial Neglect Involving Graviception

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011826
Author(s):  
Shenhao Dai ◽  
Céline Piscicelli ◽  
Emmanuelle Clarac ◽  
Monica Baciu ◽  
Marc Hommel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  
Spatial Neglect ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Vertical Orientation ◽  
Lateral Body ◽  
Pusher Syndrome ◽  
Visual Vertical ◽  
Straight Ahead ◽  
Cardinal Sign

ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that lateropulsion is an entity expressing an impaired body orientation with respect to gravity, in relation to a biased graviception and spatial neglect.MethodsData from the DOBRAS cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03203109), were collected 30 days after a first hemisphere stroke. Lateral body tilt, pushing and resistance were assessed with the Scale for Contraversive Pushing.ResultsAmong 220 individuals, 72% were Upright and 28% showed lateropulsion (Tilters=14% less severe than Pushers=14%). The three signs had very high factor loadings (>0.90) on a same dimension, demonstrating that lateropulsion was effectively an entity comprising body tilt (cardinal sign), pushing and resistance. The factorial analyses also showed that lateropulsion was inseparable from the visual vertical (VV), a criterion referring to vertical orientation (graviception). Contralesional VV biases were frequent (44%), with a magnitude related to lateropulsion severity: Upright -0.6°(-2.9;2.4), Tilters -2.9°(-7;0.8), Pushers -12.3°(-15.4;-8.5). Ipsilesional VV biases were less frequent and milder (p<0.001). They did not deal with graviception, 84% being found in upright individuals. Multivariate, factorial, contingency, and prediction analyses congruently showed strong similarities between lateropulsion and spatial neglect, the latter encompassing the former.ConclusionsLateropulsion (pusher syndrome) is a trinity constituted by body tilt, pushing and resistance. It is a way to adjust the body orientation in the roll plane to a wrong reference of verticality. Referring to straight above, lateropulsion might correspond to a form of spatial neglect (referring to straight ahead), which would advocate for 3-D maps in the human brain involving the internal model of verticality.

Correction of Posture Deviations in the Sagittal Plane Using the Pilates Method

2019 ◽  
pp. 3-13
Author(s):  
Alexandru Cîtea ◽  
George-Sebastian Iacob
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Human Body ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
The Body ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Pilates Method ◽  
The Relationship

Posture is commonly perceived as the relationship between the segments of the human body upright. Certain parts of the body such as the cephalic extremity, neck, torso, upper and lower limbs are involved in the final posture of the body. Musculoskeletal instabilities and reduced postural control lead to the installation of nonstructural posture deviations in all 3 anatomical planes. When we talk about the sagittal plane, it was concluded that there are 4 main types of posture deviation: hyperlordotic posture, kyphotic posture, rectitude and "sway-back" posture.Pilates method has become in the last decade a much more popular formof exercise used in rehabilitation. The Pilates method is frequently prescribed to people with low back pain due to their orientation on the stabilizing muscles of the pelvis. Pilates exercise is thus theorized to help reactivate the muscles and, by doingso, increases lumbar support, reduces pain, and improves body alignment.

The problem of studying motor skills in connection with the peculiarities of the body and psyche

1927 ◽  
Vol 23 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 735-740
Author(s):  
I. N. Zhilin
Keyword(s):  
Motor Skills ◽  
Motor Behavior ◽  
The Body ◽  
Motor Functions ◽  
Mental Structure ◽  
General Pathology ◽  
Mental Diseases

Kretschmer's doctrine of the correlation between physique and character overlooks a question that lies in the plane of similar correlations, namely, that of the correlation between motor functions and the mental structure of personality. This question attracts much attention these days and must occupy the most legitimate place among other problems included in the study of personality, both healthy and sick. In the latter case, it is worth remembering at least the instructions of Wernicke (2), who opined that "the general pathology of mental diseases consists in nothing else than in peculiarities of motor behavior".

How to use body tilt for the simulation of linear self motion

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 375-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.L. Groen ◽  
W. Bles
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
Flight Simulation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Motion Percept ◽  
Self Motion ◽  
Rate Limit ◽  
Pitch Tilt

We examined to what extent body tilt may augment the perception of visually simulated linear self acceleration. Fourteen subjects judged visual motion profiles of fore-aft motion at four different frequencies between 0.04âĂŞ0.33 Hz, and at three different acceleration amplitudes (0.44, 0.88 and 1.76 m / s 2 ). Simultaneously, subjects were tilted backward and forward about their pitch axis. The amplitude of pitch tilt was systematically varied. Using a two-alternative-forced-choice paradigm, psychometric curves were calculated in order to determine: 1) the minimum tilt amplitude required to generate a linear self-motion percept in more than 50% of the cases, and 2) the maximum tilt amplitude at which rotation remains sub-threshold in more than 50% of the cases. The results showed that the simulation of linear self motion became more realistic with the application of whole body tilt, as long as the tilt rate remained under the detection threshold of about 3 deg/s. This value is in close agreement with the empirical rate limit commonly used in flight simulation. The minimum required motion cue was inversely proportional to stimulus frequency, and increased with the amplitude of the visual displacement (rather than acceleration). As a consequence, the range of useful tilt stimuli became more critical with increasing stimulus frequency. We conclude that this psychophysical approach reveals valid parameters for motion driving algorithms used in motion base simulators.

Light Organ and Eyestalk Compensation to Body Tilt in the Luminescent Midwater Shrimp, Sergestes Similis

1982 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-104
Author(s):  
MICHAEL I. LATZ ◽  
JAMES F. CASE
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Light Source ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Light Organ ◽  
Total Compensation ◽  
Angular Movement ◽  
Counter Rotation ◽  
Light Organs ◽  
Before And After

The posterior light organ and eyestalk of the midwater shrimp, Sergestes similis Hansen, are capable of 140° of angular movement within the body during pitch body tilt, maintaining the organs at near horizontal orientations. Counter-rotations compensate for 74–80% of body inclination. These responses are statocyst mediated. Unilateral statolith ablation reduces compensation by 50%. There is no evidence for either homolateral or contralateral control by the single functioning statocyst. Bilateral lith ablation abolishes counter-rotation. Light organ and eyestalk orientations are unaffected by the direction of imposed body tilt. Bioluminescence is emitted downward from horizontal animals with an angular distribution similar to the distribution of oceanic light. The amount of downward directed luminescence in tilted animals decreases at large angles of body inclination due to less than total compensation by the light organs. Eye turning towards a light source is induced by upward-directed illumination. The resulting change in eyestalk orientations never amounts to more than 25°. The turning is abolished by bilateral statolith ablation. Downward directed illumination, comparable in intensity to oceanic light, generally does not generate significant eye turning. Light organ orientations remain unaffected by directional illumination, both before and after bilateral statolith ablation. The compensatory counter-rotations by the posterior light organ and eyestalk suggest that counter-illumination by S. similis remains effective in inclined animals.

scholarly journals KAPASITAS PERKEMBANGAN KEMAMPUAN MOTORIK PADA ANAK USIA TAMAN KANAK-KANAK

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-37
Author(s):  
Ahadin Ahadin
Keyword(s):  
Motor Skills ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
The Body ◽  
Power Balance ◽  
Motor Behaviour ◽  
Motor Ability ◽  
Community Environment ◽  
Child Interaction ◽  
Individual Capacity ◽  
Integrated Or

Motor ability is an individual capacity to develop the ability of the skills that are possessed in an effort to heighten or accelerate the mastery of a skill. Individual capacities that are motor capability consist of: speed (speed), agility, power, balance (balance), flexibility (flexibility), and coordination (coordination). Motor development is a change in motor behaviour that occurs because of maturity and child interaction with the environment. Maturity is a change that occurs in the body within a period of time. While the environment consists of: family, friends play, and community environment. The function of motor capability for children in kindergarten is to promote labor, facilitate, accelerate in the mastery of various motor skills studied. Motor skills are a child's ability to display or demonstrate a skill. Motor capability occurs or is acquired through an integrated or associated process along with an exercise or enhancement through experience. Motor capability will occur with a change from time to time relatively permanent in the capacity to showcase a skilled motor skill.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document