scholarly journals Neck Muscle Vibration and Spatial Orientation During Stepping in Place in Humans

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 2232-2241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Bove ◽  
Gregoire Courtine ◽  
Marco Schieppati
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Neck Muscle ◽  
Body Rotation ◽  
Erect Posture ◽  
Proprioceptive Input ◽  
Neck Muscle Vibration ◽  
Stepping In Place

Unilateral long-lasting vibration was applied to the sternomastoid muscle to assess the influence of asymmetric neck proprioceptive input on body orientation during stepping-in-place. Blindfolded subjects performed 3 sequences of 3 trials, each lasting 60 s: control, vibration applied during stepping (VDS), and vibration applied before stepping (VBS). VDS caused clear-cut whole body rotation toward the side opposite to vibration. The body rotated around a vertical axis placed at about arm's length from the body. The rotation did not begin immediately on switching on the vibrator. The delay varied from subject to subject from a few seconds to about 10 s. Once initiated, the angular velocity of rotation was remarkably constant (about 1°/s). In VBS, at the beginning of stepping, subjects rotated for a while as if their neck were still vibrated. At a variable delay, the direction of rotation reversed, and the effects were opposite to those observed during VDS. Under no condition did head rotation, head roll, or lateral body tilt accompany rotation. The results confirm and extend the notion that the neck proprioceptive input plays a major role in body orientation during locomotion. The body rotation does not seem to depend on the same mechanisms that modify the erect posture; rather, the asymmetric neck input would seem to modify the egocentric body-centered coordinate system.

Stance- and Locomotion-Dependent Processing of Vibration-Induced Proprioceptive Inflow From Multiple Muscles in Humans

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 772-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grégoire Courtine ◽  
Alessandro Marco De Nunzio ◽  
Micaela Schmid ◽  
Maria Vittoria Beretta ◽  
Marco Schieppati
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
The Body ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Neck Muscle ◽  
Muscle Vibration ◽  
Mapping Study ◽  
Body Mapping ◽  
Neck Muscle Vibration ◽  
Postural Changes ◽  
Postural Orientation

We performed a whole-body mapping study of the effect of unilateral muscle vibration, eliciting spindle Ia firing, on the control of standing and walking in humans. During quiet stance, vibration applied to various muscles of the trunk-neck system and of the lower limb elicited a significant tilt in whole body postural orientation. The direction of vibration-induced postural tilt was consistent with a response compensatory for the illusory lengthening of the stimulated muscles. During walking, trunk-neck muscle vibration induced ample deviations of the locomotor trajectory toward the side opposite to the stimulation site. In contrast, no significant modifications of the locomotor trajectory could be detected when vibrating various muscles of the lower as well as upper limb. The absence of correlation between the effects of muscle vibration during walking and standing dismisses the possibility that vibration-induced postural changes can account for the observed deviations of the locomotor trajectory during walking. We conclude that the dissimilar effects of trunk-neck and lower limb muscle vibration during walking and standing reflect a general sensory-motor plan, whereby muscle Ia input is processed according to both the performed task and the body segment from which the sensory inflow arises.

Perception of passive whole-body rotations in the absence of neck and body proprioception

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 2216-2219 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Blouin ◽  
J. L. Vercher ◽  
G. M. Gauthier ◽  
J. Paillard ◽  
C. Bard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Normal Subjects ◽  
The Body ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Neck Muscle ◽  
Body Rotation ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Third ◽  
Muscle Proprioception ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Accurate Perception

1. This study investigated whether accurate perception of body rotation after passive horizontal whole-body rotations in the dark requires the integration of both vestibular and neck-body proprioceptive signals. 2. In the first experiment, the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) of normal subjects ("controls") and of a patient without proprioception of the neck and body muscles was assessed by the use of pulse and sinusoidal stimulation. In the second experiment, the subjects reported verbally the magnitude of the body rotations. Finally, in the third experiment, they shifted gaze to the position fixated before the rotation ("vestibular memory-contingent saccades" paradigm). 3. The VOR gain of the patient was similar to that of controls, although the body rotations of the patient were largely overestimated, regardless of whether the patient reported the perceived magnitude verbally or through a gaze shift toward the position gazed at before the rotation. 4. These results suggest that neck muscle proprioception contributes to the vestibular signal calibration at the perceptual level necessary for determining body orientation accurately after rotations in the dark.

scholarly journals The A-Effect and Global Motion

Vision ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Pearl Guterman ◽  
Robert Allison
Keyword(s):  
Optic Flow ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Global Motion ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
And Shifts ◽  
Self Motion ◽  
Gravitational Vertical

When the head is tilted, an objectively vertical line viewed in isolation is typically perceived as tilted. We explored whether this shift also occurs when viewing global motion displays perceived as either object-motion or self-motion. Observers stood and lay left side down while viewing (1) a static line, (2) a random-dot display of 2-D (planar) motion or (3) a random-dot display of 3-D (volumetric) global motion. On each trial, the line orientation or motion direction were tilted from the gravitational vertical and observers indicated whether the tilt was clockwise or counter-clockwise from the perceived vertical. Psychometric functions were fit to the data and shifts in the point of subjective verticality (PSV) were measured. When the whole body was tilted, the perceived tilt of both a static line and the direction of optic flow were biased in the direction of the body tilt, demonstrating the so-called A-effect. However, we found significantly larger shifts for the static line than volumetric global motion as well as larger shifts for volumetric displays than planar displays. The A-effect was larger when the motion was experienced as self-motion compared to when it was experienced as object-motion. Discrimination thresholds were also more precise in the self-motion compared to object-motion conditions. Different magnitude A-effects for the line and motion conditions—and for object and self-motion—may be due to differences in combining of idiotropic (body) and vestibular signals, particularly so in the case of vection which occurs despite visual-vestibular conflict.

scholarly journals Contribution of Somesthetic Information to the Perception of Body Orientation in the Pitch Dimension

2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 909-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Bringoux ◽  
Vincent Nougier ◽  
Ludovic Marin ◽  
Pierre-Alain Barraud ◽  
Christian Raphel
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Vertical Position ◽  
Starting Position ◽  
Pitch Dimension ◽  
Cast Condition ◽  
Static Body ◽  
Body Cast

This study investigated the contribution of otolithic and somesthetic inputs in the perception of body orientation when pitching at very slow velocities. In Experiment 1, the subjects’ task was to indicate their subjective postural vertical, in two different conditions of body restriction, starting from different angles of body tilt. In the “strapped” condition, subjects were attached onto a platform by means of large straps. In the “body cast” condition, subjects were completely immobilized in a depressurized system, which attenuates gravity-based somesthetic cues. Results showed that the condition of body restriction and the initial tilt largely influenced the subjective postural vertical. In Experiment 2, subjects were displaced from a vertical position and had to detect the direction of body tilts. Results showed that the threshold for the perception of body tilt was higher when subjects were immobilized in the body cast and when they were tilted backward. Experiment 3 replicated the same protocol from a supine starting position. Compared to results of Experiment 2, the threshold for the perception of body tilt decreased significantly. Overall, these data suggested that gravity-based somesthetic cues are more informative than otolithic cues for the perception of a quasi-static body orientation.

Effects of an 8-Week Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training on Cycling Performance, Back Pain, and Posture of a 17-Year-Old Road Cyclist

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Joshua Berger ◽  
Oliver Ludwig ◽  
Stephan Becker ◽  
Wolfgang Kemmler ◽  
Michael Fröhlich
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Training Stimulus ◽  
Cycling Performance ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Time Saving ◽  
Intensive Training ◽  
Positive Effects

A 17-year-old male road cyclist with unspecific back pain and postural deficiency regarding the depth of the lumbar lordosis (flèche lombaire [fl]) and the upper body tilt (forward trunk tilt [tt]) absolved an 8-week whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) training to improve performance parameters and health issues. During WB-EMS, muscle groups all over the body are stimulated via external electrodes, thus creating an intensive training stimulus due to the electrically induced involuntary muscle contraction. The athlete’s posture (fl 2.2%, tt 64.3%) and back pain (54%) improved, and trunk strength increased (extension 15.5%, flexion 29.2%). This is the first WB-EMS study of a minor cyclist, suggesting positive effects of WB-EMS as a time-saving strength training method on health and strength parameters.

scholarly journals Podokinetic After-Rotation Is Transiently Enhanced or Reversed by Unilateral Axial Muscle Proprioceptive Stimulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Sozzi ◽  
Antonio Nardone ◽  
Oscar Crisafulli ◽  
Marco Schieppati
Keyword(s):  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Rotation Velocity ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Muscle Vibration ◽  
Body Rotation ◽  
Lumbar Level ◽  
Axial Muscle ◽  
Paravertebral Muscles ◽  
Stepping In Place

Unilateral axial muscle vibration, eliciting a proprioceptive volley, is known to incite steering behavior. Whole-body rotation while stepping in place also occurs as an after-effect of stepping on a circular treadmill (podokinetic after-rotation, PKAR). Here, we tested the hypothesis that PKAR is modulated by axial muscle vibration. If both phenomena operate through a common pathway, enhancement or cancellation of body rotation would occur depending on the stimulated side when vibration is administered concurrently with PKAR. Seventeen subjects participated in the study. In one session, subjects stepped in place eyes open on the center of a platform that rotated counterclockwise 60°/s for 10 min. When the platform stopped, subjects continued stepping in place blindfolded. In other session, a vibratory stimulus (100 Hz, 2 min) was administered to right or left paravertebral muscles at lumbar level at two intervals during the PKAR. We computed angular body velocity and foot step angles from markers fixed to shoulders and feet. During PKAR, all subjects rotated clockwise. Decreased angular velocity was induced by right vibration. Conversely, when vibration was administered to the left, clockwise rotation velocity increased. The combined effect on body rotation depended on the time at which vibration was administered during PKAR. Under all conditions, foot step angle was coherent with shoulder angular velocity. PKAR results from continuous asymmetric input from the muscles producing leg rotation, while axial muscle vibration elicits a proprioceptive asymmetric input. Both conditioning procedures appear to produce their effects through a common mechanism. We suggest that both stimulations would affect our straight ahead by combining their effects in an algebraic mode.

Neck muscle spindle activity in the decerebrate, unparalyzed cat: dynamics and influence of vestibular stimulation

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 917-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kasper ◽  
V. J. Wilson ◽  
Y. Yamagata ◽  
B. J. Yates
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Spindle ◽  
Muscle Spindles ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
High Gain ◽  
Neck Muscles ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Neck Muscle ◽  
Response Dynamics ◽  
Decerebrate Cat

1. Using floating electrodes, we recorded from neck-muscle spindle afferents in the C2 dorsal root ganglion of the decerebrate cat. Nerves to dorsal neck muscles were cut so that the afferents presumably originated mainly from ventral and ventrolateral perivertebral muscles and sternocleidomastoid. One goal of our experiments was to study possible vestibular influence exerted on these spindles via the fusimotor system. Unparalyzed preparations were therefore used. 2. Stimuli consisted of sinusoidal rotations in vertical planes. Neck tilt stretched neck muscles, whereas whole-body tilt stimulated vestibular receptors. 3. For each afferent we first determined the most effective direction of neck tilt, then used stimuli oriented close to this direction to study response dynamics, particularly gain of responses to stimuli of different amplitudes (0.5-7.5 degrees). 4. Three-quarters of the afferents failed to respond to 0.5 degrees, 0.2-Hz neck rotations. Stimuli that were effective usually elicited responses that had low gain and were linear over the whole range of amplitudes. Only a few afferents had behavior typical of spindle primary afferents: high-gain responses to small sinusoidal stimuli, gain decreasing as stimulus amplitude increases. This prevalence of static spindle responses in the unparalyzed cat is in striking contrast to results obtained on neck-muscle spindles in paralyzed, decerebrate cats, and on hindlimb extensor muscle spindles in decerebrate, unparalyzed cats. 5. Paralysis produced by injection of Flaxedil changed the behavior of 2/4 spindle afferents tested, causing the appearance of high-gain responses to 0.5 degrees stimuli and of nonlinear behavior.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Muscle Vibration-Induced Illusions: Review of Contributing Factors, Taxonomy of Illusions and User’s Guide

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell W. Taylor ◽  
Janet L. Taylor ◽  
Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
Muscle Spindles ◽  
Body Part ◽  
The Body ◽  
Neck Muscle ◽  
Muscle Vibration ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Neck Muscle Vibration ◽  
Consistent Manner ◽  
Perception Theory

Limb muscle vibration creates an illusory limb movement in the direction corresponding to lengthening of the vibrated muscle. Neck muscle vibration results in illusory motion of visual and auditory stimuli. Attributed to the activation of muscle spindles, these and related effects are of great interest as a tool in research on proprioception, for rehabilitation of sensorimotor function and for multisensory immersive virtual environments. However, these illusions are not easy to elicit in a consistent manner. We review factors that influence them, propose their classification in a scheme that links this area of research to perception theory, and provide practical suggestions to researchers. Local factors that determine the illusory effect of vibration include properties of the vibration stimulus such as its frequency, amplitude and duration, and properties of the vibrated muscle, such as contraction and fatigue. Contextual (gestalt) factors concern the relationship of the vibrated body part to the rest of the body and the environment. Tactile and visual cues play an important role, and so does movement, imagined or real. The best-known vibration illusions concern one’s own body and can be classified as ‘first-order’ due to a direct link between activity in muscle spindles and the percept. More complex illusions involve other sensory modalities and external objects, and provide important clues regarding the hidden role of proprioception, our ‘silent’ sense. Our taxonomy makes explicit this and other distinctions between different illusory effects. We include User’s Guide with tips for anyone wishing to conduct a vibration study.

Response of vestibular neurons to head rotations in vertical planes. II. Response to neck stimulation and vestibular-neck interaction

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1765-1778 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kasper ◽  
R. H. Schor ◽  
V. J. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
The Body ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Frequency Range ◽  
Vestibular Input ◽  
Response Dynamics ◽  
Neck Input ◽  
Wide Range

1. We have studied the responses of neurons in the lateral and descending vestibular nuclei of decerebrate cats to stimulation of neck receptors, produced by rotating the body in vertical planes with the head stationary. The responses to such neck stimulation were compared with the responses to vestibular stimulation produced by whole-body tilt, described in the preceding paper. 2. After determining the optimal vertical plane of neck rotation (response vector orientation), the dynamics of the neck response were studied over a frequency range of 0.02-1 Hz. The majority of the neurons were excited by neck rotations that brought the chin toward the ipsilateral side; most neurons responded better to roll than to pitch rotations. The typical neck response showed a low-frequency phase lead of 30 degrees, increasing to 60 degrees at higher frequencies, and a gain that increased about threefold per decade. 3. Neck input was found in about one-half of the vestibular-responsive neurons tested with vertical rotations. The presence of a neck response was correlated with the predominant vestibular input to these neurons; neck input was most prevalent on neurons with vestibular vector orientations near roll and receiving convergent vestibular input, either input from both ipsilateral vertical semicircular canals, or from canals plus the otolith organs. 4. Neurons with both vestibular and neck responses tend to have the respective orientation vectors pointing in opposite directions, i.e., a head tilt that produces an excitatory vestibular response would produce an inhibitory neck response. In addition, the gain components of these responses were similar. These results suggest that during head movements on a stationary body, these opposing neck and vestibular inputs will cancel each other. 5. Cancellation was observed in 12 out of 27 neurons tested with head rotation in the mid-frequency range. For most of the remaining neurons, the response to such a combined stimulus was greatly attenuated: the vestibular and neck interaction was largely antagonistic. 6. Neck response dynamics were similar to those of the vestibular input in many neurons, permitting cancellation to take place over a wide range of stimulus frequencies. Another pattern of interaction, observed in some neurons with canal input, produced responses to head rotation that had a relatively constant gain and remained in phase with position over the entire frequency range; such neurons possibly code head position in space.

scholarly journals Neuroanatomical correlates of the perception of body axis orientation during body tilt: a voxel-based morphometry study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Tani ◽  
Satoshi Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Longitudinal Axis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Axis ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Voxel Based Morphometry ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Axis Orientation ◽  
The Right

AbstractAccurate perception of the orientations of the body axis and gravity is essential for actions. The ability to perceive these orientations during head and body tilt varies across individuals, and its underlying neural basis is unknown. To address this, we investigated the association between inter-individual differences in local gray matter (GM) volume and inter-individual differences in the ability to estimate the directions of body longitudinal axis or gravity during whole-body tilt using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis in 50 healthy adults (20–46 years, 25 men and 25 women). Although no anatomical regions were identified relating to performance requiring estimates of gravitational direction, we found a significant correlation between the GM volume in the right middle occipital gyrus and the ability to estimate the body axis orientation. This finding provides the first evidence on neuroanatomical substrates of the perception of body axis orientation during body tilt.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document