Efficacy of posterior only approach for complex iatrogenic flat back

Author(s):  
K Martikos ◽  
F Vommaro ◽  
L Boriani ◽  
A Scarale ◽  
P Zarantonello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Brendan L Pinto ◽  
Clark R Dickerson

Employing an arched back posture during the bench press exercise is increasingly popular. Vertical displacement of the barbell is commonly believed to be the key difference influencing strength performance between an arched and flat back bench press technique. However, comparisons between these back postures using a free weight barbell are lacking. Directly comparing performance between each posture is confounded by many variables such as proficiency and fatigue. This investigation aimed to investigate whether changing back posture alone can influence barbell kinematics, to indirectly assess potential performance differences. Twenty males performed one repetition of the bench press exercise using either an arched or flat back posture, at 25%, 50% and 75% of their one repetition maximum, in a repeated measures study design. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. Changing back posture alone, reduced vertical displacement (approximately 11% average difference across all load conditions) and barbell to glenohumeral joint moment arm (approximately 20% difference) in the arched posture compared to the flat posture. These changes occurred without any specific cueing of the barbell motion and may increase the potential for lifting higher loads and decrease cumulative joint exposure. Additional cueing and training may be required to maximize the mechanical advantage available with each back posture. The arched posture appears to have an increased potential for further improvements in vertical displacement and moment arm through specific cueing. Future comparisons should consider if each back posture’s potential mechanical advantage has been maximized when assessing differences between techniques.


Spine ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Chul Lee ◽  
Jang-Gyu Cha ◽  
Yongdai Kim ◽  
Yon-Il Kim ◽  
Byung-Joon Shin

2003 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 492-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A Rickard

This small portrait miniature emerged in the sale, by an anonymous vendor, of part of the contents of a country house near Stamford, in Lincolnshire, on 16 February 2002. The image is painted in watercolour on a pale carnation ground with a support of either card or vellum and is in good condition with only one marginal abrasion. To the right of the miniature, against the pale blue background and parallel to the boy's left shoulder, is the monogram of ‘G’ above ‘I’. The frame is an oval seventeenth-century silver locket with a flat back measuring 33mm × 28mm. The convex glass is held in place by a gold band, and attached to the back is a gold loop secured by a thin flat plate, which is possibly a later addition.


1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (8) ◽  
pp. 894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myron M. LaBan ◽  
Ronald S. Taylor
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. V5
Author(s):  
Alexandria C. Marino ◽  
Thomas J. Buell ◽  
Rebecca M. Burke ◽  
Tony R. Wang ◽  
Chun-Po Yen ◽  
...  

Three-column osteotomies (3COs) can achieve significant alignment correction when revising fixed sagittal plane deformities; however, the technique is associated with high complication rates. The authors demonstrate staged anterior-posterior surgery with L5–S1 ALIF (below a prior L3–5 fusion) and multilevel Smith-Petersen osteotomies to circumvent the morbidity associated with 3CO. The patient was a 67-year-old male with three prior lumbar surgeries who presented with back and leg pain. Imaging demonstrated lumbar flat back deformity and sagittal imbalance. The narrated video details key radiological measurements, operative planning and rationale, surgical steps, and outcomes. The patient provided written, informed consent for publication of this illustrative case.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/wv4W9D9fUPc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document