scholarly journals Apolipoprotein A1 in Cerebrospinal Fluid Is Insufficient to Distinguish Alzheimer’s Disease from Other Dementias in a Naturalistic, Clinical Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolai Maximilian Stoye ◽  
Patrick Jung ◽  
Malena dos Santos Guilherme ◽  
Johannes Lotz ◽  
Andreas Fellgiebel ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 687-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalinde E.R. Slot ◽  
Argonde C. Van Harten ◽  
Maartje I. Kester ◽  
Wesley Jongbloed ◽  
Femke H. Bouwman ◽  
...  

Antioxidants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianna Romani ◽  
Alessandro Trentini ◽  
Wiesje M. van der Flier ◽  
Tiziana Bellini ◽  
Giovanni Zuliani ◽  
...  

Background: It has been suggested that circulating Paraoxonase-1 (PON1) and apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1), which closely interacts with the antioxidant enzyme, could be implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) development. This study aimed to evaluate PON1 changes in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as evidence for its association with AD or VaD. Methods: Serum PON-arylesterase activity was measured in patients with AD, VaD, and CONTROLS distributed in two cohorts: Ferrara cohort (FC: n = 503, age = 74 years) and Amsterdam Dementia cohort (ADC: n = 71, age = 65 years). In the last cohort, CSF PON-arylesterase, CSF β-amyloid1-42, p-tau and t-tau, and imaging biomarkers were also measured. Results: AD and VaD patients of FC showed significantly lower levels of serum PON-arylesterase compared to CONTROLS, but this outcome was driven by older subjects (>71 years, p < 0.0001). In the younger ADC, a similar decreasing (but not significant) trend was observed in serum and CSF. Intriguingly, PON-arylesterase per APOA1 correlated with t-tau in AD group (r = −0.485, p = 0.002). Conclusion: These results suggest that decreased peripheral PON-arylesterase might be a specific feature of older AD/VaD patients. Moreover, we showed that PON-arylesterase/APOA1 is inversely related to neurodegeneration in AD patients, suggesting a prognostic usefulness of this composite parameter.


2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 561-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellis Niemantsverdriet ◽  
Julie Ottoy ◽  
Charisse Somers ◽  
Ellen De Roeck ◽  
Hanne Struyfs ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Dominique Gouilly ◽  
Camille Tisserand ◽  
Leonor Nogueira ◽  
Laura Saint-Lary ◽  
Vanessa Rousseau ◽  
...  

The consistency of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β (Aβ)42/40 ratio and Aβ 42 has not been assessed in the AT(N) classification system. We analyzed the classification changes of the dichotomized amyloid status (A+/A–) in 363 patients tested for Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers after Aβ 42 was superseded by the Aβ 42/40 ratio. The consistency of Aβ 42 and the Aβ 42/40 ratio was very low. Notably, the proportions of “false” A+T–patients were considerable (74–91%) and corresponded mostly to patients not clinically diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. Our results suggest that the interchangeability of Aβ 42/40 ratio and Aβ 42 is limited for classifying patients in clinical setting using the AT(N) scheme.


HAPS Educator ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43
Author(s):  
Brie Paddock ◽  
Kimberly Canfield ◽  
Sarah Cooper

2021 ◽  
pp. 174077452110344
Author(s):  
Michelle M Nuño ◽  
Joshua D Grill ◽  
Daniel L Gillen ◽  

Background/Aims: The focus of Alzheimer’s disease studies has shifted to earlier disease stages, including mild cognitive impairment. Biomarker inclusion criteria are often incorporated into mild cognitive impairment clinical trials to identify individuals with “prodromal Alzheimer’s disease” to ensure appropriate drug targets and enrich for participants likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease dementia. The use of these eligibility criteria may affect study power. Methods: We investigated outcome variability and study power in the setting of proof-of-concept prodromal Alzheimer’s disease trials that incorporate cerebrospinal fluid levels of total tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated (p-tau) as primary outcomes and how differing biomarker inclusion criteria affect power. We used data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative to model trial scenarios and to estimate the variance and within-subject correlation of total and phosphorylated tau. These estimates were then used to investigate the differences in study power for trials considering these two surrogate outcomes. Results: Patient characteristics were similar for all eligibility criteria. The lowest outcome variance and highest within-subject correlation were obtained when phosphorylated tau was used as an eligibility criterion, compared to amyloid beta or total tau, regardless of whether total tau or phosphorylated tau were used as primary outcomes. Power increased when eligibility criteria were broadened to allow for enrollment of subjects with either low amyloid beta or high phosphorylated tau. Conclusion: Specific biomarker inclusion criteria may impact statistical power in trials using total tau or phosphorylated tau as the primary outcome. In concert with other important considerations such as treatment target and population of clinical interest, these results may have implications to the integrity and efficiency of prodromal Alzheimer’s disease trial designs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document