scholarly journals Chromosome numbers in some Artemisia (Asteraceae, Anthemideae) species and genome size variation in its subgenus Dracunculus: Karyological, systematic and phylogenetic implications

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaume Pellicer ◽  
Sònia Garcia ◽  
Teresa Garnatje ◽  
Shagdar Dariimaa ◽  
Aleksandr A. Korobkov ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (8) ◽  
pp. 1241-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliška Štubňová ◽  
Iva Hodálová ◽  
Jaromír Kučera ◽  
Lenka Mártonfiová ◽  
Marek Svitok ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Leong-Skornickova ◽  
O. Sida ◽  
V. Jarolimova ◽  
M. Sabu ◽  
T. Fer ◽  
...  

Plants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bokyung Choi ◽  
Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss ◽  
Eva M. Temsch ◽  
Soonku So ◽  
Hyeon-Ho Myeong ◽  
...  

Chromosome numbers, karyotypes, and genome sizes of 14 Iris L. (Iridaceae Juss.) species in Korea and their closely related taxon, Sisyrinchium rosulatum, are presented and analyzed in a phylogenetic framework. To date, understanding the chromosomal evolution of Korean irises has been hampered by their high chromosome numbers. Here, we report analyses of chromosome numbers and karyotypes obtained via classic Feulgen staining and genome sizes measured using flow cytometry in Korean irises. More than a two-fold variation in chromosome numbers (2n = 22 to 2n = 50) and over a three-fold genome size variation (2.39 pg to 7.86 pg/1 C) suggest the putative polyploid and/or dysploid origin of some taxa. Our study demonstrates that the patterns of genome size variation and chromosome number changes in Korean irises do not correlate with the phylogenetic relationships and could have been affected by different evolutionary processes involving polyploidy or dysploidy. This study presents the first comprehensive chromosomal and genome size data for Korean Iris species. Further studies involving molecular cytogenetic and phylogenomic analyses are needed to interpret the mechanisms involved in the origin of chromosomal variation in the Iris.


2019 ◽  
Vol 192 (4) ◽  
pp. 887-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geyner Alves Dos Santos Cruz ◽  
José Roseno De Mendonça Filho ◽  
Santelmo Vasconcelos ◽  
Jaílson Gitaí ◽  
José Marcello Salabert De Campos ◽  
...  

Abstract We describe the chromosome numbers and genome sizes of species of the cryptanthoid complex of Bromeliaceae in a phylogenetic framework and their relationship with habitat preferences. The 2C DNA contents varied 2.13-fold among species, ranging from 0.76 to 1.66 pg. A significant difference in DNA content was found among Cryptanthus, Hoplocryptanthus and Rokautskyia. Moreover, species from campos rupestres and the Atlantic Forest had lower and higher genome size values, respectively. The smaller genome sizes of Hoplocryptanthus spp. from campos rupestres may be related with the large genome constraint. The species show a highly conserved ploidy (with 2n = 32 and 34), although the genome sizes varied considerably. The observed variation in chromosome numbers seems to be influenced by dysploidy, but additional investigations are needed. Our study demonstrates that the genome size variation in the cryptanthoid complex species is not strictly related to the phylogenetic relationships and has probably been influenced by different evolutionary processes.


Crop Science ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 261 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lane Rayburn ◽  
D. P. Biradar ◽  
R. L. Nelson ◽  
R. McCloskey ◽  
K. M. Yeater

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 170862 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ritchie ◽  
A. J. Jamieson ◽  
S. B. Piertney

Genome size varies considerably across taxa, and extensive research effort has gone into understanding whether variation can be explained by differences in key ecological and life-history traits among species. The extreme environmental conditions that characterize the deep sea have been hypothesized to promote large genome sizes in eukaryotes. Here we test this supposition by examining genome sizes among 13 species of deep-sea amphipods from the Mariana, Kermadec and New Hebrides trenches. Genome sizes were estimated using flow cytometry and found to vary nine-fold, ranging from 4.06 pg (4.04 Gb) in Paralicella caperesca to 34.79 pg (34.02 Gb) in Alicella gigantea . Phylogenetic independent contrast analysis identified a relationship between genome size and maximum body size, though this was largely driven by those species that display size gigantism. There was a distinct shift in the genome size trait diversification rate in the supergiant amphipod A. gigantea relative to the rest of the group. The variation in genome size observed is striking and argues against genome size being driven by a common evolutionary history, ecological niche and life-history strategy in deep-sea amphipods.


Genome ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 393-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas W. Jeffery ◽  
Kristin Hultgren ◽  
Solomon Tin Chi Chak ◽  
T. Ryan Gregory ◽  
Dustin R. Rubenstein

Although crustaceans vary extensively in genome size, little is known about how genome size may affect the ecology and evolution of species in this diverse group, in part due to the lack of large genome size datasets. Here we investigate interspecific, intraspecific, and intracolony variation in genome size in 39 species of Synalpheus shrimps, representing one of the largest genome size datasets for a single genus within crustaceans. We find that genome size ranges approximately 4-fold across Synalpheus with little phylogenetic signal, and is not related to body size. In a subset of these species, genome size is related to chromosome size, but not to chromosome number, suggesting that despite large genomes, these species are not polyploid. Interestingly, there appears to be 35% intraspecific genome size variation in Synalpheus idios among geographic regions, and up to 30% variation in Synalpheus duffyi genome size within the same colony.


Caryologia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oriane Hidalgo ◽  
Joan Vallès ◽  
Angel Romo ◽  
Miguel-Ángel Canela ◽  
Teresa Garnatje

2008 ◽  
Vol 276 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 209-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itayguara Ribeiro da Costa ◽  
Marcelo Carnier Dornelas ◽  
Eliana Regina Forni-Martins

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document