scholarly journals Research Publications in Web of Science shift from Bitcoin to Blockchain, with Focus on Computer Science, Engineering, Telecommunications, and Business Economics

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Price ◽  
Greta Snyder
Keyword(s):  
Computer Science ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Business Economics ◽  
Research Publications

scholarly journals GESTÃO DO CONHECIMENTO E GESTÃO DA INOVAÇÃO: UM ESTUDO BIBLIOMÉTRICO NA WEB OF SCIENCE (1945-2015)

2016 ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Paulo Fernando Marschner ◽  
Lucas Veiga Ávila ◽  
Analisa Tiburski Sommer
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Social Science ◽  
Computer Science ◽  
Operations Research ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Library Science ◽  
Research Management ◽  
Business Economics

Este estudo tem como objetivo analisar as características das publicações sobre Knowledge management (Gestão do conhecimento) e Innovation management (Gestão da inovação) na base de dados Web of Science, no período de 1945 a 2015. O trabalho descritivo e quantitativo, de natureza bibliométrica, busca levantar as características da produção acadêmica. Como principal resultado das 372 publicações analisadas constatou-se que os anos com maior publicação foram os de 2008 e 2015, em especial nas seguintes áreas temáticas: Business economics (Economia Empresarial), Operations research management science (Gestão de Operações), Engineering (Engenharias), Computer science (Ciência da Computação), Information science library science (Ciência da informação/biblioteconomia), Social science (Ciências Sociais). Os documentos são 66,6% proceedings paper, e o principal titulo é o International journal of technology management. Os países com maior número de produção são a China e os Estados Unidos, e o principal idioma é a língua inglesa.

A Scientometric Mapping of Contributions to Journal of Computer Science and Technology during 2012-2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Vimlesh Patel
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Computer Science ◽  
Geographical Distribution ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Chinese Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Prolific Authors ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

The paper presents a Scientometrics mapping of papers published inJournal of Computer Science and Technology, during 2012 to 2016 as reflected in Web of Science database. It attempts to analyze the growth and development of publications output of Journal of Computer Science and Technologyas reflected. Data for a total of 485 have been downloaded and analysed according to objectives. The study reveals thatThe year wise growth rate revel that highest no. papers published in 2015, No. of Papers: 106 (21.86%) Authorship pattern data reveals that most of the authors like to publish papers in collaborations and most preferred authorship pattern was four author i.e. no. publications for four authors were 125 (25.77 %). The Degree of Collaboration (DC) revel that DC is found highest in 0.95 Co-Authored Publication. The highly prolific authors and their publications revel that Zhang L, published highest numbers of papers (11 nos.), the geographical distribution contributions (International) is revel that Peoples R China is in the top with no. of publications is 371 (76.50%), it is found from institution-wise distribution of papers that highest contributed institutions was Chinese Academy of Sciences with 93 Publications (19.18%) is placed at 1st rank and the average of citations per year (2012-2016) were 205.

scholarly journals A new database of the references on international clinical practice guidelines: a facility for the evaluation of clinical research

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 1221-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Eriksson ◽  
Annika Billhult ◽  
Tommy Billhult ◽  
Elena Pallari ◽  
Grant Lewison
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Impact ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Research Publications ◽  
Research Level

AbstractAlthough there are now several bibliographic databases of research publications, such as Google Scholar, Pubmed, Scopus, and the Web of Science (WoS), and some also include counts of citations, there is at present no similarly comprehensive database of the rapidly growing number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), with their references, which sometimes number in the hundreds. CPGs have been shown to be useful for the evaluation of clinical (as opposed to basic) biomedical research, which often suffers from relatively low counts of citations in the serial literature. The objectives were to introduce a new citation database, clinical impact®, and demonstrate how it can be used to evaluate research impact of clinical research publications by exploring the characteristics of CPG citations of two sets of papers, as well as show temporal variation of clinical impact® and the WoS. The paper includes the methodology used to retain the data and also the rationale adopted to achieve data quality. The analysis showed that although CPGs tend preferentially to cite papers from their own country, this is not always the case. It also showed that cited papers tend to have a more clinical research level than uncited papers. An analysis of diachronous citations in both clinical impact® and the WoS showed that although the WoS citations showed a decreasing trend after a peak at 2–3 years after publication, this was less clear for CPG citations and a longer timescale would be needed to evaluate their impact on these documents.

What Researchers are Currently Saying about Ontologies: A Review of Recent Web of Science Articles

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-219
Author(s):  
Luís Miguel Oliveira Machado ◽  
Maurício Barcellos Almeida ◽  
Renato Rocha Souza
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Computer Science ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Mixed Methodology ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Fields Of Study ◽  
Current Prevalence ◽  
The Web

Traditionally connected to philosophy, the term ontology is increasingly related to information systems areas. Some researchers consider the approaches of the two disciplinary contexts to be completely different. Others consider that, although different, they should talk to each other, as both seek to answer similar questions. With the extensive literature on this topic, we intend to contribute to the understanding of the use of the term ontology in current research and which references support this use. An exploratory study was developed with a mixed methodology and a sample collected from the Web of Science of articles published in 2018. The results show the current prevalence of computer science in studies related to ontology and also of Gruber's view suggesting ontology as kind of conceptualization, a dominant view in that field. Some researchers, particularly in the field of biomedicine, do not adhere to this dominant view but to another one that seems closer to ontological study in the philosophical context. The term ontology, in the context of information systems, appears to be consolidating with a meaning different from the original, presenting traces of the process of “metaphorization” in the transfer of the term between the two fields of study.

scholarly journals Computer science in Eastern Europe 1989-2014: a bibliometric study

2015 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalibor Fiala ◽  
Peter Willett
Keyword(s):  
Computer Science ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Bibliometric Study ◽  
Eastern European ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Publication Rates ◽  
Computer Science Research ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Web

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study the development of research in computer science in 15 Eastern European countries following the breaching of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted a bibliometric analysis of 82,121 computer science publications indexed in the Web of Science database and investigated publication, citation, and collaboration patterns of the individual countries. Findings – Poland has been the most productive country, followed by Russia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, and Slovenia. Publication rates have increased substantially over the period, but this has not been accompanied by a corresponding increase in the quality of the publications. Hungary and Slovenia are the most influential countries in terms of citations per paper. Artificial Intelligence is the most frequently occurring computer science subject category, with Interdisciplinary Applications the category with the greatest impact. USA, Germany, UK, France, and Canada are the most frequently collaborating western nations, and papers published in collaboration with US authors accrue the most citations. Originality/value – This is the first ever bibliometric study of the whole post-communist Eastern European computer science research as indexed in the Web of Science.

scholarly journals Research Output from IISc during 1999-2020: Scientometrics Analysis Case Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 052-062
Author(s):  
Nagarjuna Pitty
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Indian Institute ◽  
H Index ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Research Publications ◽  
Indian Institute Of Science

Over the past Seven decades the knowledge or web of science database maintaining the core collections of Science Citation Index Expanded, and past Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science and past two decades SciELO Citation Index, Journal citation reports. This paper analyses a results of a scientometric analytical case study of the research activities of highly cited papers from 1999 to 2020. This paper study a growth of publications, citations, average citations per publication and H- index of top scientists or researchers, at Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India. Besides that, this paper presents a citation-based mapping of data on global scientific activities from Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India research publications using Web of Science Database. Using different kind of scientometric approaches, such as a h-index and Global Citation Scores. Researchers have published 32191 publications during 1999-2020 and cited at least 5519 times by end of 2020 are analyzed. Authors have been able to place their papers in high impact journals such as Physics, Engineering, Chemistry, Materials Science, Science & Technology, Computer Science, Biochemistry Molecular Biology, Mechanics, Mathematics, Telecommunications, and Crystallography. The study discloses an output of Indian Institute of Science Research Publications has greatly increased over period.

scholarly journals The Universities Ranking World Cup: A Global View by Continent and Country from the Computer Science Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 277-285
Author(s):  
Sónia Rolland Sobral ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Computer Science ◽  
Direct Relationship ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
University Rankings ◽  
World Cup ◽  
University Ranking ◽  
Global View ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Total Dependence ◽  
Scopus Database

University rankings are lists of universities ranked according to different criteria: different systems, published annually. This article uses seven of the world's best-known global rankings and only in the context of computer science: Shanghai Ranking’s Academic, CWTS Leiden, Quacquarelli Symonds, Times Higher Education, National Taiwan University, Best Global Universities USNews and University Ranking by Academic Performance. We present the top10 universities by each ranking system and by continent and country those that appear in the top20, top100 and top500. Each of these rankings has different items and weights, which will be listed and analyzed in this article. The results are very different from each other because they follow different systems. This article shows that in top10 there is a direct relationship between the massive presence of top Asian universities and the total dependence on Web of Science publications. The same is not true when the data source is Scopus database.

scholarly journals Mapping of Celiac Disease Research Literature: A Scientometric Approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 150-160
Author(s):  
M. Mercy Clarance ◽  
S. Raja
Keyword(s):  
Celiac Disease ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Doubling Time ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Prolific Author ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Disease Research ◽  
Research Publications ◽  
The Web

The study aims to evaluate the celiac disease research publications in the Web of Science database from the years 2015 to 2018. The keyword used the term "Celiac Disease" from the Web of Science database collects the records. A total of 4147 records were collected from this study of Celiac disease. The highest productive year is 2017 with 1062 records (25.61%) and the last position of papers was published 1016(24.50%) in the year is 2016. The table provides the value of the average RGR of publications, which decreased from 6.93537 in 2015 to -0.01997 in 2018. At the same time, the value of doubling time (DT) of publications increased from 0.099923 (2015) to -34.6983 (2018). It has shown that the degree of collaboration range from zero to 0.95. The most prolific author Lebwohl B occupied in first position 107(2.58%) records. The most productive country USA placed in the topmost position with 1149(27.71%) records. The authorship pattern of celiac disease research this table notes that the majority of the articles were contributed by four authors 549(13.24%). These three authors were contributed 538(12.97%) second position of papers in this study. The first position of the journal is Gastroenterology published records with 260(6.27%). The language-wise distributions of published records in Celiac disease research in this present study. The most productive language is English with 4032(97.23%), and the last productivity language is Icelandic with 1(0.02%) publications. The Study concludes that Celiac Disease Research lags in this research, so come forward with financial institutions to encourage researchers and scientists to develop celiac research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document