scholarly journals Genetic and Epigenetic Markers to Identify High Risk Patients for Multiple Early Gastric Cancers after Treatment with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayumi Fukuda ◽  
Hiroshi Yokozaki ◽  
Masatsugu Shiba ◽  
Kazuhide Higuchi ◽  
Tetsuo Arakawa
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Epigenetic Markers ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Gastric Cancers ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Risk Patients

Genetic Markers to Identify High Risk Patients for Multiple Early Gastric Cancers After Treatment with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. AB187
Author(s):  
Mayumi Fukuda ◽  
Kazuhide Higuchi ◽  
Hiroshi Yokozaki ◽  
Tetsuya Tanigawa ◽  
Masatsugu Shiba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Genetic Markers ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Gastric Cancers ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Risk Patients

Combination of norfloxacin and cisapride in prevention of SBP in high risk patients: A new approach

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A376-A376
Author(s):  
B JEETSANDHU ◽  
R JAIN ◽  
J SINGH ◽  
M JAIN ◽  
J SHARMA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
New Approach ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

1610: High-Risk Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy Today are Less High-Risk than in the Past

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 436-436
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Kane ◽  
Martha K. Terris ◽  
William J. Aronson ◽  
Joseph C. Presti ◽  
Christopher L. Amling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
The Past ◽  
Risk Patients

995: Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Polyamines Discriminates High Risk Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 263-263
Author(s):  
Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq ◽  
Florence Jouan ◽  
Pascale Bellaud ◽  
Jacques-Philippe Moulinoux ◽  
Karim Bensalah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Immunohistochemical Analysis ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Outcome of carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia with respect to the patients’ risk profile

VASA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksic ◽  
Luebke ◽  
Brunkwall
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Hostile Neck ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Angioplasty And Stenting

Background: In the present study the perioperative complication rate is compared between high- and low-risk patients when carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is routinely performed under local anaesthesia (LA). Patients and methods: From January 2000 through June 2008 1220 consecutive patients underwent CEA under LA. High-risk patients fulfilled at least one of the following characteristics: ASA 4 classification, “hostile neck”, recurrent ICA stenosis, contralateral ICA occlusion, age ≥ 80 years. The combined complication rate comprised any new neurological deficit (TIA or stroke), myocardial infarction or death within 30 days after CEA, which was compared between patient groups. Results: Overall 309 patients (25%) were attributed to the high-risk group, which differed significantly regarding sex distribution (more males: 70% vs. 63%, p = 0,011), neurological presentation (more asymptomatic: 72% vs. 62%, p = 0,001) and shunt necessity (33% vs. 14%, p < 0,001). In 32 patients 17 TIAs and 15 strokes were observed. In 3 patients a myocardial infarction occurred. Death occurred in one patient following a stroke and in another patient following myocardial infarction, leading to a combined complication rate of 2,9% (35/1220). In the multivariate analysis only previous neurological symptomatology (OR 2,85, 95% CI 1,38-5,91) and intraoperative shunting (OR 5,57, 95% CI 2,69-11,55) were identified as independent risk factors for an increased combined complication rate. Conclusions: With the routine use of LA, CEA was not associated with worse outcome in high-risk patients. Considering the data reported in the literature, it does not appear justified to refer high-risk patients principally to carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) when LA can be chosen to perform CEA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document