scholarly journals AUDIT COMMITTEE AND FIRM VALUE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-221
Author(s):  
Ahmet ÖZCAN
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-121
Author(s):  
Iwan Wirawardhana ◽  
Meco Sitardja

The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of Blockholder Ownership, Managerial Ownership,Institutional Ownership, and Audit Committee towards Firm Value. The background of this research isthe agency theory and ownership theory. The population in this study are 46 property companies listedon the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2012-2016. By using purposive samplingtechnique, 35 companies are qualified as data samples. This research uses the random effect model asthe estimation model and multiple regression as the method of analysis. The results of this study showsthat Institutional Ownership has a positive effect on Firm Value. Meanwhile, Blockholder Ownership,Managerial Ownership, and Audit Committee have no effect on Firm Value. Moreover, the F-testimplies that the variables, blockholder ownership, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, andaudit committee, simultaneously influence firm value.


account ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasya Anindya Pramesti ◽  
Elly Mirati ◽  
Petrus Hari Kuncoro

PENGARUH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN DIBURSA EFEK INDONESIA STUDI PADA SEKTOR CONSUMER GOODS PERIODE 2013-2017Tasya Anindya [email protected]. Elly [email protected] Hari Kuncoro [email protected] Studi Manajemen Keuangan Politeknik Negeri JakartaABSTRACTCorporate governance is one of the most important mechanism in the internal companymanagement to keep the company performance with the intention to incrase the firm value. Thepurpose of this study is to test the influence of corporate governance on firm value which is proxiedwith PBV. This research is quantitative and assocative research where data is obtained from annualreport from company that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in the consumer goods sector in 2013-2017 published by BEI. The population of this study are 46 companies with the sampling technique used is purposive sampling and 6 companies are choosen. The data analysis method used is panel regression through several tests including classic assumption test and hyppothesis testing partially and simultaneously. The results of this study are managerial ownership is significantly influenced firm value, but institutional ownership, independent commisioner, and audit committee has no influence on firm value significantly, and corporate governance simultaneously is significantly influenced firm value.Keywords: Corporate Governance, Firm Value, PBV ABSTRAKCorporate governance merupakan salah satu mekanisme yang sangat penting dalam suatuinternal manajemen perusahaan untuk menjaga kinerja perusahaan dengan tujuan meningkatkannilai perusahaan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governanceterhadap nilai perusahaan yang diwakilkan dengan PBV. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatifdan asosiatif dimana data diperoleh dari laporan tahunan perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa EfekIndonesia sektor consumer goods pada periode 2013-2017 yang diterbitkan oleh BEI. Populasi daripenelitian adalah 46 perusahaan dengan teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan purposivesampling dan hasil sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 6 perusahaan. Metode analisis data yangdigunakan adalah metode regresi data panel termasuk pengujian asumsi dan kesesuaian model danpengujian hipotesis baik secara parsial dan secara simultan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukanbahwa kepemilikan manajerial berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan, sedangkan kepemilikaninstitusonal, komisaris independen, dan komite audit tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap nilaiperusahaan, dan corporate governance secara simultan berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kata kunci: Corporate Governance, Nilai perusahaan, PBV


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-32
Author(s):  
Suzan Abed ◽  
Basil Al-Najjar

The study aims to propose a multi-theoretical framework based on information asymmetry and institutional theories by focusing on the OFR regulation changing period from 2004-2006. We carry out an empirical investigation to detect the extent of forward-looking information for a sample of 690 UK non-financial firm-year observations which are drawn from the top 500 UK. We show that the extent of voluntary disclosure of Forward Looking (FL) information is positively and significantly associated with growth opportunities, leadership, audit committee, competition rate, corporate size, and cross-listing. However, the extent of FL information is negatively and significantly associated with blockholders. This paper applies a multi-theoretical lens based on information asymmetry and institutional theories are employed in order to identify potential new determinants of voluntary disclosure in regards to forward-looking information in the UK context.


Author(s):  
Vicente Lima Crisóstomo ◽  
Aline Maria Coelho Girão

Purpose: Studies report that the adoption of good corporate governance practices tends to improve firm value. However, the results of such adoption seem to be conditioned by specific institutional and legal characteristics of each country. This study aims to analyze compliance with good corporate governance practices in the context of publicly traded companies in the Brazilian market. Methodology: The sample is made up of 1336 annual observations of 167 companies listed on the B3 (Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão) in the period 2010-2017. The practices recommended by the main corporate governance codes in Brazil were used as benchmark. Tests for the difference in means (t-test) and in proportions (z-test) were used to compare the observed situation in the group of firms and the recommendations in the Brazilian market. Results: Despite the adoption of many of the best practices recommended, there is still space for advancement in the Brazilian firm corporate governance. The results indicate noncompliance of the Brazilian firm with the recommendations regarding the audit committee and fiscal council, which may particularly weaken transparency and control of firm’s internal activities. In addition, adherence to distinguished market segments is associated to a greater trend to observe the suggestions emanating from the codes, which may be due to the perception of a favorable cost-benefit ratio of the adoption of corporate governance practices. Contributions of the Study: The work provides additional contribution by presenting a detailed analysis of the current scenario of the Brazilian firm corporate governance captured from the evaluation of the degree of adoption of each practice recommended individually.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-173
Author(s):  
Rama Andi Wiguna ◽  
Muhammad Yusuf

This research aimed to get empirical evidence about the effect of profitability and good corporate governance as proxied by the proportion of independent board commissioners, number of board commissioners meetings, proportion of audit committee, number of audit committee meetings, managerial ownersip and institutional ownership. The population of this research was companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2017. The sample of this research was fixed by purposive sampling method so that was found 88 samples. Technique of data analysis was multiple linear regression. The result of research showed that profibility, the proportion of independent board commissioners, proporsion of audit committee, managerial ownership and institutional ownership had significant positive effect on firm value, while commissioners meetings and audit committee meetings had no effect on firm value


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-72
Author(s):  
Bima Cinintya Pratama ◽  
Indriana Putri ◽  
Maulida Nurul Innayah

This study aims to examine the effect of enterprise risk management disclosure, intellectual capital disclosure, board commissioner independent, the board of director and committee audit on firm value proxied using book value. The population in this study are property, real estate, and building construction sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2018. The samples of this study are 60 companies with 180 observations listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange selected by using a purposive sampling method. The data analysis method used is multiple regression model. Based on the hypothesis that enterprise risk management disclosure, intellectual capital disclosure, independent board commissioner and audit committee have no significant effect on firm value meanwhile board of directors has a significant effect on firm value.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Siti Siti ◽  
Ahalik Ahalik

Abstrak:Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang, profitabilitas, kepemilikan manajerial, dan komite audit terhadap nilai perusahaan. Teknik pemilihan sampel penelitian ini menggunakan purposive sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 75 perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2013-2017. Data penelitian ini menggunakan data dari laporan keuangan dari setiap perusahaan sampel. Analisis data penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda dengan pemakaian SPSS 24. Nilai perusahaan dalam penelitian ini diukur dengan rasio Tobin’s Q. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang, profitabilitas, kepemilikan manajerial dan komite audit secara bersama-sama berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. Variabel kebijakan dividen (DPR), kebijakan utang (DER), kepemilikan manajerial (KM) dan komite audit (KA) tidak berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan, sedangkan profitabilitas (ROE) berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan.   Kata Kunci:kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang, nilai perusahaan, profitabilitas.              Abstract:This research was conducted with the aim to determine the effect of dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, managerial ownership, and audit committee on firm value. The technique of selecting this research sample using purposive sampling. The sample in this study were 75 manufacturing companies listed on the Stock Exchange in the period 2013-2017. This research data uses data from financial statements from each sample company. The data analysis of this study uses multiple regression analysis with the use of SPSS 24. The company value in this study is measured by Tobin’s Q ratio. The results of this study indicate dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, managerial ownership and audit committee jointly influence the firm value. The variable dividend policy (DPR), debt policy (DER), managerial ownership (KM) and audit committee (KA) did not affect the value of the company, while profitability (ROE) had a significant positive effect on firm value.   Keywords:dividend policy, debt policy, firm value, profitability


Author(s):  
Wendy Salim Saputra

<p><em>Maximizing the interests of shareholders through increasing company value is one of the goals the company wants to achieve. To achieve these objectives, the company must pay attention to several things including implementing good corporate governance, paying attention to social and environmental interests so as not to intersect and improve the ability of its human resources.</em></p><p><em>This study focuses on the implementation of corporate governance proxied by the proportion of independent board of commissioners and the number of audit committees, disclosure of corporate social responsibility and intellectual capital as well as examining its effect on firm value in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014-2016</em></p><p><em>The statistical method in this study uses multiple regression analysis, where the independent variable is the proportion of independent commissioners, the number of audit committees, coporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) and intellectual capital proxied by value added intellectual capital (VAIC). Whereas the dependent variable is the value of the company proxied by Tobin's Q</em></p><p><em>The results of this study indicate that the audit committee affects the value of the company while the proportion of independent board of directors, coporate social responsibility disclosure and value added intellectual capital does not have an influence on the value of the company.</em></p><em>Keywords: Corporate Value, Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Audit Committee, Corporate Social Responsibility, Intellectual Capital</em>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document