PA612 Double Bubble Tubular Film Process – Processability and Structure Development

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rhee ◽  
J. L. White
Author(s):  
Alexey А. Bezrodny ◽  
◽  
Van Tszin ◽  
Anatoly M. Korolyonok ◽  
◽  
...  

Polymer ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1353-1361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Elwell ◽  
Anthony J. Ryan ◽  
Henri J.M. Grünbauer ◽  
Henry C. Van Lieshout

2021 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 110973
Author(s):  
Fei Yang ◽  
Xianping Liu ◽  
Peiming Wang ◽  
Shunfeng Wang ◽  
Ian Robinson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Tanwongwan ◽  
T. Wongkitikun ◽  
K. Onpecht ◽  
S. Srilai ◽  
S. Assabumrungrat ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2513826X2110289
Author(s):  
Vitali Bagirov

Breast augmentation is the most frequently performed cosmetic surgery in the United States, with approximately 279,000 patients every year. The so-called double-bubble effect (DBE) is a common complication in breast augmentation. This complication is characterized by folds running along the lower pole of the breast, forming distinct bubble-like protrusions above and below the fold. Factors that increase the risk of DBE include bulbous breasts and a large native breast volume. There is evidence that polyurethane-coated (PU) implants may help to reduce the risk of DBE. We describe here the case of a 47-year old patient for whom DBE has recurred in each of 4 tandem breast surgeries. PU implants ultimately appeared to prevent the DBE, leading to an aesthetically satisfying treatment result for the patient. This case adds weigh to the growing body of evidence that supports the use of polyurethane implants to prevent DBE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document