scholarly journals Analyses and estimates of hydraulic conductivity from slug tests in alluvial aquifer underlying Air Force Plant 4 and Naval Air Station-Joint Reserve Base Carswell Field, Fort Worth, Texas

Author(s):  
Natalie A. Houston ◽  
Christopher L. Braun
Author(s):  
Wesley McCall ◽  
Thomas M. Christy ◽  
James J. Butler

Direct push (DP) methods provide a cost-effective alternative to conventional rotary drilling for investigations in unconsolidated formations. DP methods are commonly used for sampling soil gas, soil and groundwater; installing small-diameter monitoring wells; electrical logging; cone penetration testing; and standard penetration tests. Most recently, DP methods and equipment for vertical profiling of formation hydraulic conductivity (K) have been developed. Knowledge of the vertical and lateral variations in K is integral to understanding contaminant migration and, therefore, essential to designing an adequate and effective remediation system. DP-installed groundwater sampling tools may be used to access discrete intervals of the formation to conduct pneumatic slug tests. A small-diameter (38mm OD) single tube protected screen device allows the investigator to access one depth interval per advancement. Alternatively, a larger diameter (54mm OD) dual-tube groundwater profiling system may be used to access the formation at multiple depths during a single advancement. Once the appropriate tool is installed and developed, a pneumatic manifold is installed on the top of the DP rod string. The manifold includes the valving, regulator, and pressure gauge needed for pneumatic slug testing. A small-diameter pressure transducer is inserted via an airtight fitting in the pneumatic manifold, and a data-acquisition device connected to a laptop computer enables the slug test data to be acquired, displayed, and saved for analysis. Conventional data analysis methods can then be used to calculate the K value from the test data. A simple correction for tube diameter has been developed for slug tests in highly permeable aquifers. The pneumatic slug testing technique combined with DP-installed tools provides a cost-effective method for vertical profiling of K. Field comparison of this method to slug tests in conventional monitoring wells verified that this approach provides accurate K values. Use of this new approach can provide data on three-dimensional variations in hydraulic conductivity at a level of detail that has not previously been available. This will improve understanding of contaminant migration and the efficiency and quality of remedial system design, and ultimately, should lead to significant cost reductions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1227-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben W. J. Surridge ◽  
Andrew J. Baird ◽  
A. L. Heathwaite

Ground Water ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 492-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Mas-Pla ◽  
T.-C. Jim Yeh ◽  
Thomas M. Williams ◽  
John F. McCarthy

2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley McCall ◽  
James J. Butler ◽  
John M. Healey ◽  
Alyssa A. Lanier ◽  
Stephen M. Sellwood ◽  
...  

Abstract A new direct-push procedure has been developed for the purpose of conducting discrete-interval slug tests to define vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity (K.) This approach is an extension of existing dual-tube methods developed for soil sampling. In this procedure, nested rods (tubes) are simultaneously advanced to predetermined test intervals. The inner rods are then removed and a screen is inserted into the formation for slug testing and possible water sampling. Once testing and sampling are completed, the screen is retrieved, the inner rods reinserted, and the system is advanced to the next test interval. A series of field tests were performed in a highly permeable sand and gravel aquifer to assess the effectiveness of this new approach. Dual-tube profiling results were compared to multilevel slug tests conducted in conventional monitoring wells for intervals in which hydraulic conductivity ranged from 175 ft/day to over 800 ft/day. An initial evaluation found that the dual-tube profiling results were in good agreement (< or =12 percent difference) with K values obtained from multilevel slug tests in the closest monitoring well. Two more-detailed profiles demonstrate that the dual-tube method can effectively delineate small-scale vertical and horizontal variations in hydraulic conductivity. This field assessment shows that the dual-tube method is an accurate and efficient procedure for obtaining information about spatial variations in hydraulic conductivity. This information can be useful for selecting intervals for well installations, for assessment of various remediation alternatives, and for identifying preferential flow paths and other features that can control contaminant movement in the subsurface. The information is obtained without the need for permanent wells. Because this is a direct-push procedure, drill cuttings are eliminated and the volume of development water generated is significantly reduced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document