Bibliography on the occurrence and uses of zeolites from sedimentary deposits, 1993-1997

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A. Sheppard ◽  
E.W. Sheppard
Keyword(s):  
Sedimentary Deposits

The Chingandzha flora of the Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanic belt

Palaeobotany ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 13-179
Author(s):  
L. B. Golovneva
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Volcanic Belt ◽  
Flowering Plants ◽  
Sedimentary Deposits ◽  
North East ◽  
The North ◽  
Magadan Region ◽  
Chukotka Volcanic Belt ◽  
Systematic Composition ◽  
Coastal Lowlands

The Chingandzha flora comes from the volcanic-sedimentary deposits of the Chingandzha Formation (the Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanic belt, North-East of Russia). The main localities of the Chingandzha flora are situated in the Omsukchan district of the Magadan Region: on the Tap River (basin of the middle course of the Viliga River), on the Kananyga River, near the mouth of the Rond Creek, and in the middle reaches of the Chingandzha River (basin of the Tumany River). The Chingandzha flora includes 23 genera and 33 species. Two new species (Taxodium viligense Golovn. and Cupressinocladus shelikhovii Golovn.) are described, and two new combinations (Arctopteris ochotica (Samyl.) Golovn. and Dalembia kryshtofovichii (Samyl.) Golovn.) are created. The Chingandzha flora consists of liverworts, horsetails, ferns, seed ferns, ginkgoaleans, conifers, and angiosperms. The main genera are Arctop teris, Osmunda, Coniopteris, Cladophlebis, Ginkgo, Sagenoptepis, Sequoia, Taxodium, Metasequoia, Cupressinocladus, Protophyllocladus, Pseudoprotophyllum, Trochodendroides, Dalembia, Menispermites, Araliaephyllum, Quereuxia. The Chingandzha flora is distinct from other floras of the Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanic belt (OCVB) in predominance of flowering plants and in absence of the Early Cretaceous relicts such as Podozamites, Phoenicopsis and cycadophytes. According to its systematic composition and palaeoecological features, the Chingandzha flora is similar to the Coniacian Kaivayam and Tylpegyrgynay floras of the North-East of Russia, which were distributed at coastal lowlands east of the mountain ridges of the OCVB. Therefore, the age of the Chingandzha flora is determined as the Coniacian. This flora is assigned to the Kaivayam phase of the flora evolution and to the Anadyr Province of the Siberian-Canadian floristic realm. The Chingandzha flora is correlated with the Coniacian Aleeky flora from the Viliga-Tumany interfluve area and with other Coniacian floras of the OCVB: the Chaun flora of the Central Chukotka, the Kholchan flora of the Magadan Region and the Ul’ya flora of the Ul’ya Depression.

Modeling Sedimentary Deposits on the Continental Margin

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Swift ◽  
Alan W. Niedoroda ◽  
Christopher W. Reed
Keyword(s):  
Continental Margin ◽  
Sedimentary Deposits

scholarly journals Geochemistry of Sphalerite from the Permian Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulphide (VHMS) Deposits in the Tasik Chini Area, Peninsular Malaysia: Constraints for Ore Genesis

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 728
Author(s):  
Mohd Basril Iswadi Basori ◽  
Sarah E. Gilbert ◽  
Khin Zaw ◽  
Ross R. Large
Keyword(s):  
Variable Temperature ◽  
Mineral Chemistry ◽  
Peninsular Malaysia ◽  
Massive Sulphide ◽  
Compositional Variation ◽  
Volcanic Origin ◽  
Sedimentary Deposits ◽  
Depositional Processes ◽  
Tasik Chini ◽  
Vhms Deposits

The Bukit Botol and Bukit Ketaya deposits are two examples of volcanic-hosted massive sulphide (VHMS) deposits that occur in the Tasik Chini area, Central Belt of Peninsular Malaysia. The mineralisation is divided into subzones distinguished by spatial, mineralogical, and textural characteristics. The primary sulphide minerals include pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and galena, with lesser amounts of Sn- and Ag-bearing minerals, with Au. However, pyrrhotite is absent from both deposits. This study presents the results of sphalerite chemistry analysed by using an electron microprobe. Two types of sphalerite are recognised: sphalerite from the Bukit Botol deposit reveals a range of <DL to 24.0 mole% FeS, whereas sphalerite from the Bukit Ketaya deposit shows a range of <DL to 3 mole% FeS. Significant variations are shown in Zn, Cu, Cd, and Ag levels. Although the sphalerite has a wide variation in composition, a discernible decreasing Fe trend is exhibited from the stringer zone towards massive sulphide. This compositional variation in sphalerites may in part reflect variable temperature and activity of sulphur in the hydrothermal fluids during ore formation. Alternatively, the bimodal composition variations suggest that mineral chemistry relates to contrasting depositional processes. The Zn/Cd ratios for sphalerite from both these deposits are similar to those exhibited by volcano−sedimentary deposits with a volcanic origin. Therefore, the consistently low Cd concentrations and moderate to high Zn/Cd ratios suggest mixing of seawater and minor magmatic fluids controlling the chemistry of sphalerite at both deposits during their formation.

Correlation of a Volcanic Ash bed in Pleistocene Deposits near Mount Blanco, Texas, with the Guaje Pumice Bed of the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico

1972 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 554-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen A. Izett ◽  
Ray E. Wilcox ◽  
Glenn A. Borchardt
Keyword(s):  
New Mexico ◽  
Volcanic Ash ◽  
Fission Track ◽  
Major Elements ◽  
Flow Sheet ◽  
Chemical Analyses ◽  
Sedimentary Deposits ◽  
Jemez Mountains ◽  
Bandelier Tuff ◽  
Minimum Age

A rhyolitic volcanic ash bed about 0.3 m thick is exposed in a roadcut along Texas Highway 193 near Mount Blanco in the upper part of a sequence of Pleistocene sedimentary deposits at the type locality of the Blanco Formation, about 59 km northeast of Lubbock, Texas. This ash, here named informally the Guaje ash bed, has chemical and petrographic characteristics closely resembling those of the rhyolitic air-fall tephra (Guaje Pumice Bed) that directly underlies ash flows of Pleistocene age in the Jemez Mountains of northern New Mexico. The Guaje Pumice Bed and the ash flows belong to the Otowi Member of the Bandelier Tuff. Properties common to the Guaje ash bed and the Guaje Pumice Bed include: refractive index of glass, 1.497–1.498; microphenocrysts of quartz, sanidine (Or42–44), ferrohedenbergite (Fe51Ca42Mg7), chevkinite, allanite, zircon, and magnetite. Chemical composition of the glass of the Guaje ash bed matches that of the Guaje Pumice Bed for all major elements except K and Na and for trace elements determined by standard chemical analyses, atomic absorption, and neutron activation. Paleomagnetic measurements indicate that the ash has reverse depositional remanent magnetization. Glass shards of the ash have a fission-track age of about 1.4 ± 0.2 m. y. Sanidine from the Guaje Pumice Bed and its genetically related ash-flow sheet in the Jemez Mountains was K-Ar dated at about 1.4 m. y. by R. R. Doell and his colleagues in 1968. Correlation of the Guaje ash bed with the radiometrically dated Guaje Pumice Bed establishes a minimum age of about 1.4 m. y. for the Blanco Formation.

Estrutura dos depósitos sedimentares quaternários da bacia hidrográfica do rio Santana, Miguel Pereira, Estado do Rio de Janeiro

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 8-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Valdetaro Madeira ◽  
Leonardo Borghi
Keyword(s):  
Alluvial Fans ◽  
Fluvial System ◽  
Soil Horizons ◽  
Hydrographic Basin ◽  
Sedimentary Deposits ◽  
River Bed ◽  
Anthropogenic Action ◽  
High Terrace ◽  
Crevasse Splay ◽  
Geomorphological Features

The present work deals with stratigraphy, sedimentology and geomorphology of Quaternary sedimentary deposits of Santana river hydrographic basin. through facies and arquitectural elements descriptions. Based on five arquitectural elements characterized by ten lithofacies the following structural and depositional evolutions were scheduled: 1) formation of thick soil horizons over the basement; 2) deposition of several alluvial fans on the soils (lithofacies Gm and Fm, element E); 3) above an unconformity we can recognize a fluvial system, characterized by a non well drainage floodplain. This floodplain is overlaid by high-sinuosity channels (lithofacies Sp and St, element C) genetically related to other floodplain (lithofacies Fl and Fsc, element A) where the interfigering with crevasse splay deposits (lithofacies Sh, Sl, and Sp, element B) is ususal; 4) an erosional phase suceed by a new depositional phase characterized by low-sinuosity channels (lithofacies Gp, Gt, Sp, St, and Sh, element D). Nowadays anthropogenic action produces a new erosional phase. The geomorphological features recognized were scheduled: 1) the present floodplain 1.5m above the river bed; 2) the low terrace ( named T2) 5m above the river bed and its deposits is related to element D; 3) the high terrace ( named T1) 11m above the river bed and its deposits is related to elements A, B, C and E.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document