scholarly journals Distribution of sand and gravel in New Hampshire

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Koteff ◽  
David R. Soller
Keyword(s):  
New Hampshire ◽  
Sand And Gravel

scholarly journals New Hampshire and Vicinity Continental Shelf: Sand and Gravel Resources

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Ward ◽  
Zachary McAvoy ◽  
Maxlimer Coromoto Vallee-Anziani
Keyword(s):  
Continental Shelf ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Sand And Gravel

Available sand and gravel resources in southern New Hampshire

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Duval ◽  
David M. Sutphin ◽  
Herbert A. Pierce
Keyword(s):  
New Hampshire ◽  
Sand And Gravel

Malpractice & Negligence: State Supreme Courts Limit Therapists’ Duties to Third Parties

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-205
Author(s):  
Megan Cleary
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Child Sexual Abuse ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
State Supreme Courts ◽  
Recovered Memories ◽  
Supreme Courts ◽  
Repressed Memory ◽  
University Of Colorado

In recent years, the law in the area of recovered memories in child sexual abuse cases has developed rapidly. See J.K. Murray, “Repression, Memory & Suggestibility: A Call for Limitations on the Admissibility of Repressed Memory Testimony in Abuse Trials,” University of Colorado Law Review, 66 (1995): 477-522, at 479. Three cases have defined the scope of liability to third parties. The cases, decided within six months of each other, all involved lawsuits by third parties against therapists, based on treatment in which the patients recovered memories of sexual abuse. The New Hampshire Supreme Court, in Hungerford v. Jones, 722 A.2d 478 (N.H. 1998), allowed such a claim to survive, while the supreme courts in Iowa, in J.A.H. v. Wadle & Associates, 589 N.W.2d 256 (Iowa 1999), and California, in Eear v. Sills, 82 Cal. Rptr. 281 (1991), rejected lawsuits brought by nonpatients for professional liability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document