scholarly journals Sistem Keadilan Pemilu dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran dan Sengketa Proses Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Sumatera Barat

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 001
Author(s):  
Khairul Fahmi ◽  
Feri Amsari ◽  
Busya Azheri ◽  
Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah

Sistem keadilan pemilu telah dibangun dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017. Hal itu ditandai dengan diaturnya seluruh prosedur pelaksanaan tahapan pemilu dan mekanisme penanganan pelanggaran atau sengketa pemilu. Penyelesaian pelanggaran pemilu dilakukan oleh Bawaslu. Dalam menyelesaikan pelanggaran dan sengketa, Bawaslu berwenang menerbitkan putusan yang bersifat final. Dengan wewenang tersebut peran Bawaslu diperkuat dalam kerangka penegakan hukum untuk keadilan pemilu. Kajian ini hendak menelaah bagaimana kewenangan tersebut dilaksanakan, khususnya di Sumatera Barat. Dipilihnya Sumbar karena provinsi ini menjadi salah satu daerah yang rawan dari aspek penyelenggaraan pemilu yang bebas dan adil. Selain itu, di Sumbar juga terjadi peningkatan jumlah kasus yang ditangani Bawaslu pada Pemilu 2019 dibandingkan 2014. Terkait hal itu, masalah yang hendak dijawab adalah bagaimana penegakan hukum pemilu dilaksanakan Bawaslu dalam rangka mewujudkan keadilan pemilu, khususnya dalam penanganan pelanggaran dan sengketa pemilu. Masalah tersebut dijawab menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan mengandalkan bahan hukum berupa putusan pengadilan dan putusan Bawaslu Propinsi dan Bawaslu Kabupaten/Kota. Dalam kajian ini disimpulkan bahwa sistem keadilan pemilu telah dijalankan dalam proses penanganan pelanggaran dan sengketa oleh Bawaslu di Sumatera Barat. Hal itu ditandai dengan diprosesnya setiap laporan pelanggaran administrasi, dugaan tindak pidana dan sengketa pemilu berdasarkan prosedur yang ditentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Walaupun demikian, beberapa kelemahan yang ditemui masih mengganjal cita perwujudan keadilan pemilu secara lebih optimal.The electoral justice system has been established in Law Number 7 of 2017. It is marked the electoral justice system has been established in Law Number 7 of 2017. It is marked by the regulation of all procedures for implementing the election stages and the mechanism for handling election violations or disputes. The settlement of violations and election disputes is carried out by Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu). In resolving violations and conflicts, Bawaslu has the authority to issue final decisions. With this authority, the role of Bawaslu is strengthened in the framework of law enforcement for election justice. This study would like to examine how this authority is exercised, especially in West Sumatra. West Sumatra has chosen because this province has become one of the most vulnerable areas in terms of organizing free and fair elections. Furthermore, there has also been an increase in the number of cases handled by Bawaslu in the 2019 elections compared to 2014 in West Sumatera. Therefore, how election law enforcement is carried out by Bawaslu to realize electoral justice, particularly in handling election violations and disputes. This article using normative legal research methods by relying on legal materials in the form of court decisions and decisions of the Bawaslu in province and city. In this study, it was concluded that the electoral justice system had implemented in the process of handling violations and disputes by Bawaslu in West Sumatra. All complaint report indicated it, i.e., administrative offenses, alleged criminal acts, and election disputes have been passed based on procedures determined by statutory regulations. However, there are still some weaknesses that must be evaluated because the election justice can not maximize. 

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34
Author(s):  
Syailendra Anantya Prawira

General Elections are the embodiments of the mandate stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 1 paragraph (2) which affirms that "sovereignty is in the hands of the people and carried out according to the Constitution". The Formulation Document that will be formulated in the research are: (1) What is the violation in the general election? And (2) What is law enforcement in general election. The method used in this study is normative legal research, normative legal research methods or library law research methods are methods or procedures that are used in legal research by examining existing library material. Election violations constitute acts prohibited by the Election Law against election organizers resulting in the imposition of sanctions for violations. The enactment of Law Number 7 Year 2017 on General Elections provides for different types of violations, disputes, criminal offenses and electoral disputes. The crime of elections is a criminal offense punishable by a particular punishment based on the criminal justice system. The purpose of election is to carry out popular sovereignty and the realization of the political rights of the people to produce leaders who will occupy important positions in the government.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-154
Author(s):  
Edi Tuahta Putra Saragih ◽  
Muhammad Citra Ramadhan ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini

This research aimed to: (a) obtain the forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); (b) understand the role of the police, in this case the Police Precinct, in the law enforcement; (c) identify the factors that influenced the law enforcement. The research method used the normative-empirical legal research, with the initial stages of specifying norms in order to get the proper picture, and then specifying empirical events in order to get the real picture. The research results showed several matters: 1) The forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics) found included: the distribution of the works or the copies, the performances of the works, and the announcements of the works; 2) Police Precinct did notultimately carry out their role as a law enforcer for the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); and 3) The factors that influenced the law enforcement on the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics), namely: legislation factor, in the matter of complaint offenses; law enforcement factor, in terms of the capacity of members; less supportive factor of facilities and infrastructure; legal awareness factor, in the problem of the lack of legal counseling; and cultural factor, related to the differences in norms in the copyright law between those in society and those in regulations. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Haryanto Ginting ◽  
Muazzul Muazzul

<p class="1judul"><em><span>The Role of the Police in the Application of Restorative Justice to Perpetrators of Criminal Offenses Conducted by Children and Adults</span></em></p><p class="1judul"> </p><h1><span lang="EN-US">The rise of cases of brawl between high school students and even not only between high school students, but also has hit up to campuses, this often happens in big cities such as Jakarta, Surabaya, and Medan. This study aims to determine the role of the Police in implementing Restorative Justice against perpetrators of criminal acts of beating carried out by children and adults that occurred in the District of Namo Rambe District of Deli Serdang. The research method is done by using descriptive qualitative method that is normative. Based on the data obtained in the results of this study, the authors draw conclusions as follows: The criminal justice system must always promote the importance of law and justice. But there is a false view that the measure of the success of law enforcement is only marked by the success of bringing a suspect to court and then being sentenced. The measure of success of law enforcement by law enforcement officers should be characterized by the achievement of values of justice in the community. The police as a state tool that plays a role in enforcing the law is expected to be able to respond to this by implementing a Restorative Justice mechanism.<strong></strong></span></h1>


Author(s):  
Iwan Rois ◽  
Ratna Herawati

This study aims to analyze the need to establish a special election court which has the authority to solve various election law cases in order to realize elections with integrity; and analyzing the formulation of election special justice in order to realize the integrity of the election. The research method used is the method of normative legal research and the implementation of this research collects data from various sources in order to get an answer to the issues that have been formulated. The results of the study shows that  the purpose of the need for the formation of special judicial elections; First, to meet the growing demands of increasingly complex justice in society and more election law enforcement so as to realize the integrity of the elections; Second, To handle the election law cases quickly and simply so as to obey the integrity of the election. Formulation; First, the election special justice to be able to work quickly and simply in handling election law cases, domiciled at the central and provincial level, then entering the District Court or the High Court; Secondly, the Guidelines for the election special judicial law shall be based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 Year 2017 on Procedures for the Settlement of Administrative Offenses of the General Elections in the Supreme Court. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlunya membentuk peradilan khusus pemilu yang mempunyai kewenangan menyelesaikan berbagai perkara hukum pemilu agar terwujud pemilu yang berintegritas; dan menganalisis formulasi pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu dalam rangka mewujudkan integritas pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pelaksanaan dari penelitian ini mengumpulkan bahan hukum dari berbagai sumber guna mendapatkan suatu jawaban atas pokok-pokok permasalahan yang telah dirumuskan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tujuan perlunya pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu; Pertama, Untuk memenuhi tuntutan perkembangan akan keadilan yang semakin kompleks dalam masyarakat dan lebih penegakan hukum pemilu sehingga mewujudkan integritas pemilu; Kedua, Untuk menangani perkara hukum pemilu dengan cepat dan sederhana sehingga mewudkan integritas pemilu. Formulasi; Pertama, Peradilan khusus pemilu agar bisa bekerja cepat dan sederhana dalam menangani perkara hukum pemilu, berkedudukan di tingkat pusat dan provinsi, selanjutnya masuk pada Pengadilan Negeri atau Pengadilan Tinggi; Kedua, Pedoman beracara pada peradilan khusus pemilu berdasarkan pada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum Di Mahkamah Agung.


Author(s):  
Vincent Kazmierski

Abstract This article addresses the teaching of legal research methods and doctrinal analysis within a legal studies program. I argue that learning about legal research and doctrinal analysis is an important element of legal education outside professional law schools. I start by considering the ongoing debate concerning the role of legal education both inside and outside professional law schools. I then describe the way in which the research methods courses offered by the Department of Law and Legal Studies at Carleton University attempt to reconcile the tension between “law” and legal studies. In particular, I focus on how the second-year research methods course introduces students to “traditional” legal research and doctrinal analysis within a legal studies context by deploying a number of pedagogical strategies. In so doing, the course provides students with an important foundation that allows them to embrace the multiple roles of legal education outside professional law schools.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-143
Author(s):  
Citra

Children are the next generation of the nation, the existence of children is very important because the child is a potential fate of the nation as well as a mirror attitude of life of the nation in the future. A child who is a superior seed and has the widest hope to prepare for his future as a milestone of success of a nation in the future should not fall in the world of evil. It is unfortunate that children at an early age have been involved in criminal offenses and past their youth behind bars, increasingly contaminated with other inmates. This research was empirical legal research, that is the research on the provisions of the legislation in the national law concerning restorative approach in the imposition of action sanctions against children in conflict with law in order to keep children away from imprisonment and negative stigma in society . Addressing the issue of a child in conflict with the law should be done in a familial approach and avoiding children from prison as much as possible. The sanction of action for the child contained in Article 82 of Law Number 11 of 2012 on Criminal Justice System for Children expected to prevent the child from the negative stigma in society and keep the children from bad effects of prison. Thus the current restorative model of punishment is more applicable in handling child offenders. It is expected that law enforcement officers to pay attention to the provisions of the rules that apply to children in conflict with the law in terms of imposition of more sanctions toward education and character development of children so that the threat of imprisonment becomes the last alternative in imposing sanctions for children


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-237
Author(s):  
S. N. Baburin

The article reproduces the speech of Sergey N. Baburin at the plenary session of the inter-national scientific conference "Law Enforcement in Public and Private Law", which was held on March 26, 2021 at the Faculty of Law of the Dostoevsky Omsk State University. The conference was dedicated to the 200th anniversary of the birth of Fedor M. Dostoevsky. On the example of the law enforcement of the norms of the Treaty on the Creation of the Union Russian-Belarusian State of 1999 the speaker examines the issues of modern social choice in the development of mankind. Civilizm is proposed as a new social system, and the characteristics of its constitutionalism, political system, and justice system are described. The author argues for the necessity of establishing a moral state and creating a union state with the participation of Russia by using the mechanisms of integration constitutionalism.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-124
Author(s):  
Erie Hariyanto ◽  
Moh. Efendi ◽  
Sulistiyawati Sulistiyawati

This article aims to determine the role of judges in resolving family law cases through mediation in the Religious Courts, where judges have the position as state officials as regulated in Law Number 43 of 1999 concerning Basic Personnel, can also be a mediator in the judiciary. as regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures where judges have the responsibility to seek peace at every level of the trial and are also involved in mediation procedures. The research method used in this article uses normative legal research methods. Whereas until now judges still have a very important role in resolving family law cases in the Religious Courts due to the fact that there are still many negotiating processes with mediation assisted by judges, even though on the one hand the number of non-judge mediators is available, although in each region it is not evenly distributed in terms of number and capacity. non-judge mediator.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Rimarsha Agitta ◽  
Putu Ade Harriestha Martana

Penulisan jurnal ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta memahami perang tarif pada penyedia layanan ojek dalam jaringan dalam perspektif hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia dan juga untuk mengetahui tugas Komisi Pengawas Perlindungan Usaha dalam mengawasi kasus persaingan usaha. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam jurnal ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang dimana mengkonsepsikan hukum dalam bentuk hukum yang sudah tertulis seperti undang-undang tertulis, dan bersifat deskriptif yaitu diartikan penelitian yang dilakukan dengan cara menggambarkan secara lengkap. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perang tarif antara para penyedia layanan ojek daring yaitu PT. X dan PT. Y terdapat beberapa tanda dan pola praktik predatory pricing penetapan harga oleh perusahaan transportasi daring. Menurut UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 dikatakan bahwa PT. X dan PT. Y melawan hukum dengan tidak mengikuti aturan Pasal 5 ayat (1)  UU No. 5 tahun 1999. Berdasarkan pasal tersebut sudah terbukti bahwasanya pihak PT. X dan PT. Y melanggar karena kedua perusahaan ojek daring tersebut melakukan perjanjian antara keduanya untuk menaikkan harga pada pelanggan ojek daring. Persaingan usaha memiliki lembaga pengawas yaitu Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) yang dalam masalah persaingan usaha antara PT. X dan PT. Y ini berperan sebagai salah satu lembaga penegak hukum, dan tanggung jawabnya mengawasi perilaku persaingan usaha tidak sehat para pelaku usaha. In order to  writing this journal is to know and understand the rates war between two corps who will be start to be some perspective from business competition in Indonesia and also to determine the role of the Business Protection Supervisory Commission. The research method used in this journal is normative legal research which conceptualizes law in the form of written law such as written law, and is descriptive in nature, which is defined as research that provides data about a situation or social symptoms that develop in the midst society in accordance with the facts and without any engineering. The results show that the tariff war between online motorcycle taxis, namely X Ltd. and Y Ltd., has several signs and patterns of predatory pricing practices by online transportation companies, including discounts that reach unreasonable prices, long-term promotions that exceed standards. With that it can be said that X Ltd. and Y Ltd. violate Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law no. 5 of 1999. From this article, it has been proven that X Ltd. and Y Ltd. violated it because the two online motorcycle taxi companies entered into an agreement between the two of them to increase prices for online motorcycle taxi customers. In business competition, there is the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU), which in the business competition case between X Ltd.  and Y Ltd. plays a role as a law enforcement agency, and its responsibility is to supervise the unfair business competition behavior of business actors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1862
Author(s):  
Fithrah Fithrah

Tujuan penulisan karya ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengkaji pengaturan terkait kepemilikan tanah di Indonesia oleh orang asing melalui perjanjian nominee dan upaya penegakan hukumnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil dari penulisan karya ilmiah ini ialah penegakan hukum terhadap praktek kepemilikan tanah oleh orang asing melalui perjanjian nominee dapat dilakukan oleh kejaksaan selaku organ negara yang mewakili kepentingan publik, baik melalui sarana perdata maupun pidana. Hal ini perlu dilakukan guna melindungi tanah Indonesia dimiliki oleh orang asing dan guna mendukung upaya negara mewujudkan tugas konstitusionalnya, yakni menguasai tanah bagi sebesar-besarnya kesejahteraan rakyat tanpa harus memberikan ketidakadilan bagi Warga Negara Asing. The purpose of writing this scientific paper is to examine regulations related to land ownership in Indonesia by foreigners through nominee agreements and law enforcement efforts. The research method used is normative legal research methods using statute and conceptual approaches. The result of writing this scientific paper is that law enforcement against the practice of land ownership by foreigners through nominee agreements can be carried out by the prosecutor as the state organ representing the public interest, both through civil and criminal means. This needs to be done in order to protect Indonesian land owned by foreigners and to support the state's efforts to realize its constitutional duties, namely to control the land for the maximum welfare of the people without having to give injustice to foreign citizens.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document