scholarly journals Empirical Study of the Influences of Different Types of Nostalgic Advertisements on Mechanism of Action of Purchase Intention

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongping Fei ◽  
Jianfei Hua ◽  
Rong Gong
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Study ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Purchase Intention ◽  
Different Types

Empirical Study on the Behaviours of Different Types of Hong Kong Small Investorss in Their Investment

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheung-Chi Chow ◽  
Tai-Yuen Hon ◽  
Wing-Keung Wong ◽  
Kai Yin Woo
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Different Types

Challenges in the Empirical Study of Global Governance Legitimacy

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Study ◽  
Global Governance ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Cultural Factors ◽  
Theory Building ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Political Communities

This commentary discusses three challenges for the promising and ambitious research agenda outlined in the volume. First, it interrogates the volume’s attempts to differentiate political communities of legitimation, which may vary widely in composition, power, and relevance across institutions and geographies, with important implications not only for who matters, but also for what gets legitimated, and with what consequences. Second, it examines avenues to overcome possible trade-offs from gains in empirical tractability achieved through the volume’s focus on actor beliefs and strategies. One such trade-off is less attention to evolving norms and cultural factors that may underpin actors’ expectations about what legitimacy requires. Third, it addresses the challenge of theory building that can link legitimacy sources, (de)legitimation practices, audiences, and consequences of legitimacy across different types of institutions.

scholarly journals Why don’t (or do) organizations learn from projects?

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacky Swan ◽  
Harry Scarbrough ◽  
Sue Newell
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Learning ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Organizational Context ◽  
Learning Transfer ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Learning Mechanisms ◽  
Organizational Contexts ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Management Capabilities ◽  
Innovation And Change

Many different types of organizations use projects to accomplish specific tasks, especially tasks that involve innovation and change. However, there are often problems associated with both learning within projects and learning transfer from projects to the wider organization. Previous research suggests that these problems vary according to the organizational context, in particular the extent to which the organization is centred on the delivery of projects. Also, the link between project-based learning and organizational learning may be far from seamless, and may require the deployment of a range of learning mechanisms to be effective. In this article we explore and explain these problems through an empirical study which examined project-based learning across different organizational contexts. This study highlights the limitations of learning mechanisms based on reflection and codification. It suggests that firms generally only learn from projects, if at all, via the accumulation of experience amongst groups and individuals. The study suggests, however, that the accumulation of experience is most pronounced in organizational contexts which are project centred and where project management capabilities are well developed. In contrast, in organizations where projects are more varied and occasional, the struggle to exploit the highly heterogeneous forms of learning created within projects is greater.

scholarly journals Bioassay Development for Bispecific Antibodies—Challenges and Opportunities

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 5350
Author(s):  
Ames C. Register ◽  
Somayeh S. Tarighat ◽  
Ho Young Lee
Keyword(s):  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Bispecific Antibodies ◽  
Structural Variations ◽  
Antibody Therapeutics ◽  
Regulatory Guidelines ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Target Binding ◽  
Monospecific Antibodies ◽  
Complicated Mechanism

Antibody therapeutics are expanding with promising clinical outcomes, and diverse formats of antibodies are further developed and available for patients of the most challenging disease areas. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have several significant advantages over monospecific antibodies by engaging two antigen targets. Due to the complicated mechanism of action, diverse structural variations, and dual-target binding, developing bioassays and other types of assays to characterize BsAbs is challenging. Developing bioassays for BsAbs requires a good understanding of the mechanism of action of the molecule, principles and applications of different bioanalytical methods, and phase-appropriate considerations per regulatory guidelines. Here, we review recent advances and case studies to provide strategies and insights for bioassay development for different types of bispecific molecules.

scholarly journals Matching Relation Between Consumer’s Psychology And Digital Goods Rankings

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Manyi Chen ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Hongzhi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Purchase Intention ◽  
Mobile Terminal ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Digital Goods ◽  
Digital Products ◽  
Consumption Behavior ◽  
Different Types ◽  
And Cluster Analysis ◽  
Ranking Information ◽  
Matching Relation

Abstract The development of digital goods has profoundly changed the economic relationship and trading methods. Among all the digital goods recommendation information, ranking information is of prominent significance. The rankings impact consumers positively as they make decisions on buying digital products. We serve rankings and consumer psychologies as the object of this study, and will offer references and suggestions for the customization of the mobile terminal. Combining factor and cluster analysis, we subdivide the rankings into three groups first based on consumers’ values and lifestyles: reputation ranking, consumption behavior ranking and purchase intention ranking. Then, we use a correspondence analysis method to conclude the matching relationship between different types of rankings and various consumption psychology groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document