scholarly journals Reflections on methodology for assessing campus sustainability from a Turkish perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Serhat Basak
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Critical Reflection ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Innovative Approach ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Campus Sustainability ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Critical Feedback ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
External Sustainability

Aim: The author provides a critical reflection of the questionnaire discussed at the workshop “Methodology for assessing the campus sustainability from the perspective of multi-level antifragility” held on Friday 13 May at the WSB University in Wrocław. The author reflects from the background of his experience in Turkey. Design / Research methods: The author provides his own reflections and opinions, based on the discussions at the workshop. Conclusions / findings: It is very difficult to create a set of indicators making campus sustainability internationally comparable, as well as finding proper sources of information. A starting point in creating such indicators may be mistakes threatening organizational viability and external sustainability Originality / value of the article: The article provides critical feedback on an innovative approach towards research on campus sustainability.  

scholarly journals Reflections on developing indicators for campus sustainability from a fragility perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Monika Paradowska ◽  
Santa Bukauskaitė ◽  
Gytys Rimkus ◽  
Alexander Heller ◽  
Akim Sharapov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focus Groups ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Innovative Approach ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Campus Sustainability ◽  
Individual Feedback ◽  
Critical Feedback ◽  
Multi Level

Aim: Provide a summary of the discussion at the workshop on “Methodology for assessing the campus sustainability from the perspective of multi-level antifragility” held on Friday 13 May at the WSB University in Wrocław, as well as reflection notes each of the participant wrote after the workshop. The paper shows the outcome of the process of interaction and reflections of the authors regarding the methodology of assessing campus sustainability using a fragility approach. Design / Research methods: This article contains feedback based on the experience and ideas from students from Georgia, Germany, Kazakhstan and Lithuania. Discussion took place during the workshop in focus groups. Afterwards, a discussion took place among all participating students and lecturers. After the workshop, the authors wrote individual feedback notes. These are summarized in this paper. Conclusions / findings: Although there are promising element that can be developed into a framework of assessing campus sustainability from a fragility perspective, many challenges appear. In particular challenges in defining unambiguous indicators as well as finding proper sources of information were identified. Originality / value of the article: The article provides critical feedback on an innovative approach towards research on campus sustainability.

scholarly journals Reflections on the questionnaire at the workshops: Methodology for assessing the cam-pus sustainability from the perspective of multi-level antifragility

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Robert Daniel Poskart
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Critical Reflection ◽  
External Environment ◽  
Innovative Approach ◽  
Campus Sustainability ◽  
Research Workshop ◽  
Critical Feedback ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Personal Reflections

Aim: The author provides a critical reflection of the questionnaire discussed at the workshop “Methodology for assessing the campus sustainability from the perspective of multi-level antifragility” held on Friday 13 May 2016 at the WSB University in Wrocław. The aim is to make a general diagnosis of the current situation in higher education in Poland, and to propose a direction of change than can enable its survival and improve its quality.Design / Research methods: In the article, the author gives his personal reflections regarding the research questionnaire discussed at the workshop “Methodology for assessing the campus sustainability from the perspective of multi-level antifragility” in the context of the viability of higher education in Poland.Conclusions / findings:  The author selected, in his opinion, the most important elements of the questionnaire discussed at the research workshop. The main conclusion is that significant changes seem to be necessary due to the dynamic developments in the external environment, in particular the declining number of students resulting from the deepening demographic decline.Originality / value of the article: The article provides critical feedback on an innovative approach towards research on campus sustainability.

scholarly journals Knowledge and Governance: a reflection of sustainability from campus to industry

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Vania Sarahid Flores Borboa
Keyword(s):  
Design Research ◽  
Business Practice ◽  
University Staff ◽  
Campus Sustainability ◽  
Great Responsibility ◽  
Critical Feedback ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Local Companies ◽  
High Level ◽  
The University

Aim: The author provides a critical reflection of the questionnaire discussed at the workshop “Methodology for assessing the campus sustainability from the perspective of multi-level antifragility” held in June 2016 at the University of Sonora (Hermosillo, Mexico). This paper poses a reflection of how the sustainability perspective in high level education institutions could define the stage of change of alumni and therefore has an influence on sustainability issues of local companies. Design / Research methods: In the article, the author applies ideas and reflections regarding the research questionnaire discussed at the workshop “Methodology for assessing the campus sustainability from the perspective of multi-level antifragility” held in June 2016 at the University of Sonora (Hermosillo, Mexico) to sustainability issues in local companies. Conclusions / findings:  Universities have great responsibility in preparing students for applying principles of sustainability into business practice. In particular regarding the complexity of the world, where knowledge can be applied in a quickly changing environment. University staff and students can have a completely different view on the existence of different fragilities. Originality / value of the article: The article provides critical feedback on an innovative approach towards research on campus sustainability in the context of application to business practice. 

scholarly journals Reflections on methodology for and the importance of indicators for campus sustainability – a Lithuanian case study

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Diana Cibulskiene ◽  
Vėjūnė Laurinavičiūtė ◽  
Gaivilė Nemeišytė ◽  
Renata Osockyte ◽  
Raimunda Urbelytė ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Sustainable Business ◽  
Campus Sustainability ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Critical Feedback ◽  
Good Starting Point ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The University

Aim: Provide a summary of the discussion of focus group 2 at the workshop on “Methodology for assessing the campus sustainability from the perspective of multi-level antifragility” held in June 2016 at Siauliai University (Lithuania), as well as reflection notes each of the participant wrote after the workshop. The paper shows the outcome of the process of interaction and reflections of the authors. Design / Research methods: This article contains feedback based on the experience and ideas from third year students from sustainable business from the University of Siauliai (Lithuania). Discussion took place during the workshop in focus groups. Afterwards, a discussion took place among all participating students and lecturers. After the workshop, the authors wrote individual feedback notes. These are summarized in this paper. Conclusions / findings: When using a wider set of indicators of campus sustainability showing different types of fragilities, different stakeholders need to be used as a source of information. The reason is that when not possessing information on a certain aspect, as was confirmed by this focus group, an indicator tends to be considered irrelevant. A conclusion that should be treated with care is that indicators of lying and cheating, honesty, as well as indicators of mistakes may be a good starting point for creating indicators of campus sustainability focusing at threats for organizational viability and sustainability of the university’s external environment. Originality / value of the article: The article provides critical feedback on an innovative approach towards research on campus sustainability.

scholarly journals Reflections on methods for assessing campus sustainability from a Lithuanian perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Diana Cibulskiene ◽  
Alina Gogitidze ◽  
Vladimir Kuvshinov ◽  
Laura Malyševa ◽  
Kornelija Raišytė ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Design Research ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Sustainable Business ◽  
Campus Sustainability ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Individual Feedback ◽  
Critical Feedback ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
The University ◽  
Group 1

Aim: Provide a summary of the discussion of focus group 1 at the workshop on “Methodology for assessing the campus sustainability from the perspective of multi-level antifragility” held in June 2016 at Siauliai University (Lithuania), as well as reflection notes each of the participant wrote after the workshop. The paper shows the outcome of the process of interaction and reflections of the authors. Design / Research methods: This article contains feedback based on the experience and ideas from third year students of sustainable business from the University of Siauliai (Lithuania). Discussion took place during the workshop in focus groups. Afterwards, a discussion took place among all participating students and lecturers. After the workshop, the authors wrote individual feedback notes. These are summarized in this paper.  Conclusions / findings: Students may provide limited information on university viability and sustainability of the university’s external environment due to lack of information on many indicators. Many indicators on which no information was available were considered to be irrelevant, being an example of the principle “what we do not see, does not count.”  Originality / value of the article: The article provides critical feedback on an innovative approach towards research on campus sustainability.

scholarly journals Urban Sub-Center Design Framework Based on the Walkability Evaluation Method: Taking Coomera Town Sub-Center as an Example

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 6259
Author(s):  
Jizhong Shao ◽  
Minge Yang ◽  
Guan Liu ◽  
Ye Li ◽  
Dan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Low Carbon ◽  
Design Strategies ◽  
Healthy City ◽  
Quantitative Research Methods

As current society’s reflection on the rapid development of motorization and increasing emphasis on the ecological environment, the study of walkable cities has become one of the key points of urban sustainable design. Creating a walkable city is an effective way to build a low-carbon and healthy city. With the development of cities, walkability concepts and theories are constantly being given new life, and research methods and design strategies continue to be updated. A city’s walkability and walkability index have become current research hotspots. Based on prior research on walkability and related urban policies, this study selects Coomera Town on the Gold Coast of Queensland, Australia, as the research area because of Coomera Town policy regulations and environmental requirements. This study utilizes traditional qualitative and quantitative research methods, machine mining technology, and the deep learning big data analysis technology to conduct thematic design research in a real place. Its combines walkability evaluation with walkability design to construct a walkable city in a targeted manner. This provides a reference for related city design in the future.

scholarly journals Aspiration in injections: should we continue or abandon the practice?

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Yasir Sepah ◽  
Lubna Samad ◽  
Arshad Altaf ◽  
Muhammad Sohail Halim ◽  
Nithya Rajagopalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Association ◽  
Simple Procedure ◽  
Health Agency ◽  
Monitoring Network ◽  
Nursing Schools ◽  
Global Network ◽  
World Health ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Us

Aspiration during any kind of injection is meant to ensure that the needle tip is at the desired location during this blind procedure. While aspiration appears to be a simple procedure, it has generated a lot of controversy concerning the perceived benefits and indications. Advocates and opponents of aspiration both make logically sound claims. However, due to scarcity of available data, there is no evidence that this procedure is truly beneficial or unwarranted. Keeping in view the huge number of injections given worldwide, it is important that we draw attention to key questions regarding aspiration that, up till now, remain unanswered. In this review, we have attempted to gather and present literature on aspiration both from published and non-published sources in order to provide not only an exhaustive review of the subject, but also a starting point for further studies on more specific areas requiring clarification. A literature review was conducted using the US National Institute of Health’s PubMed service (including Medline), Google Scholar and Scopus. Guidelines provided by the World Health Organization, Safe Injection Global Network, International Council of Nursing, Center for Disease Control, US Federal Drug Agency, UK National Health Services, British Medical Association, Europe Nursing and Midwifery Council, Public Health Agency Canada, Pakistan Medical Association and International Organization of Standardization recommendations 7886 parts 1-4 for sterile hypodermics were reviewed for relevant information. In addition, curricula of several medical/nursing schools from India, Nigeria and Pakistan, the US pharmacopeia Data from the WHO Program for International Drug Monitoring network in regard to adverse events as a result of not aspirating prior to injection delivery were reviewed. Curricula of selected major medical/nursing schools in India, Nigeria and Pakistan, national therapeutic formularies, product inserts of most commonly used drugs and other possible sources of information regarding aspiration and injections were consulted as well.

Identifying Design Interventions in Cities for Urban Sustainability

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohit Arora ◽  
Felix Raspall ◽  
Arlindo Silva
Keyword(s):  
Built Environment ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Urban Growth ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Urban Sustainability ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Urban Systems ◽  
Demolition Waste ◽  
Material Reuse

Cities have been the focus of recent sustainability and climate change mitigation efforts primarily because of unprecedented urban growth and ever-increasing resources consumption. A worrying trend has been the ever-decreasing life of buildings in cities because of premature building obsolescence. Premature building obsolescence has been cited as the major driver of demolition waste which accounts for more than 40% of total waste generated annually. This waste stream poses a bigger challenge as the pressure on natural resources increases with urban growth. A traditional way of looking at the urban sustainability has been from the perspective of the environmental sciences and waste management methods. Analyzing urban areas with design science perspectives could provide novel insights to improve existing resource consumption patterns and transform sustainability growth in cities. This study focuses on the problem of demolition waste arising from the premature building obsolescence in cities. It applies a design research methodology framework for identifying existing problems associated with demolition waste and generating strategies to transform cities into more sustainable urban systems. In the problem clarification phase, a detailed literature review was supported with stakeholder’s interviews to identify the state-of-art for building demolition process and demolition waste. Research was further extended to descriptive study-I phase to carry out a demolition case study and generate support tools to enable transformation in the existing scenario for achieving a desired state. Singapore, a dense city state of South-East Asia has been taken as a case study in this research. Results show that applying design research methods could help open-up a new dimension to solve urban sustainability challenge for built environment. It highlights that material reuse could lead to significant improvement in the built environment sustainability but the challenge associated with realization of material reuse practice needs to be addressed. Descriptive study-I concludes with the strategies on creating a reuse market through entrepreneurial innovation and an alternative material supply chain of secondary materials for regional housing demand. These results highlight the role of design research methods for tackling complex systems level problems in cities.

scholarly journals Teoretyczne i metodyczne aspekty wyznaczania indeksów cen na rynku mieszkaniowym

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radosław Trojanek
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Housing Prices ◽  
Real Estate Market ◽  
Secondary Market ◽  
Property Right ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Single Family ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Price Indexes

In the book, an attempt was made to catalogue knowledge concerning the importance of research into the dynamics of housing prices for social and economic development. The analysis of the experience of countries with well-developed real estate markets in the aspect of building price indexes was carried out. Based on original databases of asking and transaction prices, price indexes were built, which were then subjected to numerous resistance tests. The aims of these research tasks were as follows: 1) to examine the quality of offers for sale as a source of information about changes in the real estate market, 2) to find out whether the repeat sales method can be used for building price indexes and to critically assess this method in terms of the stability of the obtained results, 3) to analyze hedonic methods and indicate the preferred one in terms of the ratio of the quality of results to how time-consuming and cost-intensive it is to build such indexes, 4) to establish the importance of methods and sources of information for building price indexes in different time horizons, 5) to identify how important it is for the fluctuation of price indexes if the cooperative property right to a flat is not taken into account. In order to perform the research tasks and accomplish the goals scopes of the work were defined. The subject followed the aim of the study and refers to prices in the secondary housing market, encompassing both the property right and cooperative property right to a flat or house. The broad scope concerns the discussion in the general part, being narrowed down to the secondary market of flats located in multi-family and single-family buildings. The time scope covers the years 2000-2015, which is connected to the range of empirical studies carried out. They focused both on actual transactions and on offers of flats for sale. On this basis, we built databases which served as the starting point for further analyses. The study involved transactions and offers in the area of Poznan.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Biomarkers in Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
Sabri Soussi ◽  
Gary S. Collins ◽  
Peter Jüni ◽  
Alexandre Mebazaa ◽  
Etienne Gayat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Statistical Methods ◽  
Perioperative Medicine ◽  
Scientific Rigor ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Novel Biomarkers

SUMMARY Interest in developing and using novel biomarkers in critical care and perioperative medicine is increasing. Biomarkers studies are often presented with flaws in the statistical analysis that preclude them from providing a scientifically valid and clinically relevant message for clinicians. To improve scientific rigor, the proper application and reporting of traditional and emerging statistical methods (e.g., machine learning) of biomarker studies is required. This Readers’ Toolbox article aims to be a starting point to nonexpert readers and investigators to understand traditional and emerging research methods to assess biomarkers in critical care and perioperative medicine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document