Home Range and Habitat Selection of the Endangered Euphrates Softshell TurtleRafetus euphraticusin a Fragmented Habitat in Southwestern Iran

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanyeh Ghaffari ◽  
Flora Ihlow ◽  
Michael V. Plummer ◽  
Mahmood Karami ◽  
Nematollah Khorasani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Selection ◽  
Home Range ◽  
Fragmented Habitat ◽  
Southwestern Iran ◽  
Selection Of

scholarly journals Investigating Home Range, Movement Pattern, and Habitat Selection of Bar-headed Geese during Breeding Season at Qinghai Lake, China

Animals ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruobing Zheng ◽  
Lacy Smith ◽  
Diann Prosser ◽  
John Takekawa ◽  
Scott Newman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Selection ◽  
Home Range ◽  
Breeding Season ◽  
Movement Ecology ◽  
Movement Pattern ◽  
Qinghai Lake ◽  
Important Species ◽  
Central Asian ◽  
Anser Indicus ◽  
Selection Of

The Bar-headed Goose is the only true goose species or Anserinae to migrate solely within the Central Asian Flyway, and thus, it is an ideal species for observing the effects of both land use and climate change throughout the flyway. In this paper, we investigate the home range, movement pattern, and habitat selection of Bar-headed Geese (Anser indicus) during the breeding season at Qinghai Lake, which is one of their largest breeding areas and a major migration staging area in the flyway. We identified several areas used by the geese during the breeding season along the shoreline of Qinghai Lake and found that most geese had more than one core use area and daily movements that provided insight into their breeding activity. We also observed the intensive use of specific wetlands and habitats near Qinghai Lake. These data provide interesting insights into the movement ecology of this important species and also provide critical information for managers seeking to understand and respond to conservation concerns threatening Bar-headed Geese, such as landscape and habitat changes.

Breeding-Season Survival, Home-Range Size, and Habitat Selection of Female Bachman's Sparrows

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Y. Choi ◽  
Alexander C. Fish ◽  
Christopher E. Moorman ◽  
Christopher S. DePerno ◽  
Jessica M. Schillaci
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Selection ◽  
Home Range ◽  
Breeding Season ◽  
Home Range Size ◽  
Range Size ◽  
Selection Of

Anadromous Sturgeons: Habitats, Threats, and Management

2007 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Selection ◽  
Home Range ◽  
Atlantic Sturgeon ◽  
Lawrence Estuary ◽  
Early Juvenile ◽  
Salt Wedge ◽  
Sandy Substrate ◽  
Core Areas ◽  
St Lawrence Estuary ◽  
Selection Of

<em>Abstract</em>.—Space use and habitat selection of early juvenile Atlantic sturgeon <em>Acipenser oxyrinchus</em> have been little studied and remain largely unknown throughout the species’ range. In 2000–2002, survey trawling, ultrasonic telemetry, benthos sampling, and hydrodynamic modeling were used to determine the summer movement patterns, home range size, and habitat use and selection of early juvenile Atlantic sturgeon in the St. Lawrence estuary. Sonic-tagged Atlantic sturgeon, assumed to be age 2 based on their size, used a global area estimated at 76 km2 that included two main core areas. Individual summer home range sizes varied from 1 to 8 km2, but core areas were generally smaller than 1 km2. The mean daily distance traveled ranged from 0.4 to 13.5 km/d and was significantly related to sturgeon size. Fish were located mostly in freshwater relatively close to the salt wedge boundary and far from the shore, intertidal zones, and islands. They mostly used the 6–10-m depth range relatively close to a channel, in areas with low bottom current velocities, and over silt–clay substrates. Salinity and distance from the salt wedge were the two most important variables explaining their habitat selection. Age-0 Atlantic sturgeon used similar depth ranges, bottom salinities, and current velocities, but occupied mainly sandy substrate. Management implications of these results are discussed in relation to the impact of dredging and sediment disposal operations in the St. Lawrence estuary.

Home range and habitat selection of pampas deer

2008 ◽  
Vol 276 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Vila ◽  
M. S. Beade ◽  
D. Barrios Lamunière
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Selection ◽  
Home Range ◽  
Selection Of

scholarly journals Habitat selection of Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) displaying males: Case from Rila Mountain, Bulgaria

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitar Plachiyski ◽  
Georgi Popgeorgiev ◽  
Stefan Avramov ◽  
Yurii Kornilev
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Selection ◽  
Home Range ◽  
Scots Pine ◽  
Vegetation Cover ◽  
Habitat Management ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Tetrao Urogallus ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Convex Polygons ◽  
Selection Of

Current habitat management of the peripheral, regionally unique, and isolated Balkan capercaillie Tetrao urogallus rudolfi Dombrowski, 1912 meta-population in Bulgaria is based on obsolete knowledge of the spatial requirements of the species. Thus, we studied the habitat availability and the patterns of use by Capercaillie adult males, at the home range scale to inform and contribute to the conservation-oriented management of the threatened subspecies and its habitats. The field study was conducted during 2014–2015 in the northeastern part of Rila Mtn., Southwestern Bulgaria. Using GPS tags (“Bird 2A”, e-obs Digital Telemetry, Grünwald, Germany), a total of 38,640 GPS fixes from 3 displaying males, associated with one lek were gained. On this basis, we calculated annual and seasonal Minimum Convex Polygons (MCP), traditionally used as a measure of the maximum area of activity. Capercaillie habitat preference was computed using Manly’s habitat selection ratios (w), design III, combined with 90% Bonferroni simultaneous confidence intervals. To calculate habitat selection, we determined surface (Steepness and Exposure), forest stand succession and vegetation cover categorical variables. The habitat and surface layers was rasterized into 8 m square pixels. At the home range (MCP) scale, tagged roosters used vegetation cover non-randomly (annual: Khi2L=5738.89, df=14, p&lt;0.001; winter: Khi2L=3773.28, df=13, p&lt;0.001; summer: Khi2L=3646.32, df=14, p&lt;0.001), and preferred forests dominated by Scots pine and Macedonian pine, such as the annual selection of Scots pine and summer selection of Macedonian pine are significantly different. In terms of forest stage succession, roosters used forest stages non-randomly (annual: Khi2L=3492.57, df=8, p&lt;0.001; winter: Khi2L=2075.18, df=8, p&lt;0.001; summer: Khi2L=1670.1, df=6, p&lt;0.001), and demonstrated clear avoidance of forests stands in age classes: “0 to 40” and “41 to 80” years within the summer and annual ranges. The roosters demonstrated significant preference for southeastern exposure during the winter and annually, and significant overall avoidance of northern exposure, as well as avoidance of north-eastern aspect during the winter and south aspect during the summer (annual: Khi2L=4671.87, df=18, p&lt;0.001; winter: Khi2L=3909.04, df=16, p&lt;0.001; summer: hi2L=3095.84, df=18, p&lt;0.001). The slope class “63.1 to 73o” was not used. In the summer, Capercaillie males significantly preferred slopes within the class “27.1 to 36o” and avoided the classes “0 to 9o”, “9.1 to 18o” and “54.1 to 63o”. The birds also demonstrated significant avoidance of flat terrains within the “0 to 9o” class annually (annual: Khi2L=608.24, df=17, p&lt;0.001; winter: Khi2L=1148.37, df=16, p&lt;0.001; summer: Khi2L=906.54, df=17, p&lt;0.001).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document