scholarly journals The Perceived Value and Utilization of Occupational Therapy Models in the United States

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhonda Davis-Cheshire ◽  
Kailey Davis ◽  
Lindsay Drumm ◽  
Sydney Neal ◽  
Emma Norris ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penny Salvatori

In the middle of the twentieth century, the role of occupational therapy assistant was introduced in North America. Although the role, utilization and training of assistant personnel have raised much controversy and debate within the profession, Canada and the United States have taken very different paths in terms of dealing with these issues. This paper focuses on the history of occupational therapy assistants in Canada, using the experience in the United States for comparison purposes. The occupational therapy literature and official documents of the professional associations are used to present a chronology of major historical events in both countries. Similarities and differences emerge in relation to historical roots; training model and standards of education; certification, regulation, and standards of practice; career laddering and career mobility; and professional affiliation. The paper concludes with a summary of issues which require further exploration, debate and resolution if the profession is to move forward in Canada.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 178-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Verdine Donoso Brown ◽  
Jaime Phillip Muñoz ◽  
Janet M. Powell

Author(s):  
Rhonda Davis-Cheshire ◽  
Carly Cogar ◽  
Dayna Collier ◽  
Whooby Deriveau ◽  
Elizabeth Kunkel ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnie Dunn ◽  
Mary Ann Boyle

This study compared data collected from two questionnaires completed by faculty in professional occupational therapy education programs in the United States. The questionnaires asked respondents to describe their funding requests over two time periods; 1985 through 1987 and 1988 through 1990. The data from the first time period was reported elsewhere (Boyle, Dunn, & Kielhofner, 1990); this article presents the data from the second inquiry and compares the data from the two time periods to show trends. Programs submitted a total of 24 requests intramurally and 194 requests extramurally for a total of 218 requests during the second time period. Programs received full or partial funding for 115 proposals, a total of nearly $15 million, which was an increase of approximately $2 million. Research was funded at $1,865,500 ( n=35), a more than $1 million increase from the first time period. Programs received $5,725,790 for training ( n=35), $28,450 for model programs ( n=2), $1,326,614 for research and demonstration ( n=6), and $5,804,689 for other activities ( n=37).


2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 306-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Brown ◽  
Jeffrey L. Crabtree ◽  
Joe Wells ◽  
Keli Mu

Background. Currently, Canada and the United States are the only two countries that mandate entry to the occupational therapy profession at the master’s level. There was a recommendation considered by the American Occupational Therapy Association that by 2025 all education programs would move to the clinical doctorate level. In August 2015, the Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education made the formal decision that for now, the entry-level qualification for occupational therapists in the United States will remain at both the master’s and clinical doctorate levels. Purpose. This article presents an overview of the types of doctorates available, the pros and cons of moving to the clinical doctorate, and some potential questions that will need to be considered. Key issues. Is the next step in the educational progression of occupational therapy in Canada the entry-level clinical doctorate? What are the potential implications for the profession, our clients, and funders? Implications. Further discourse and investigation of this issue is needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janis W Yue ◽  
Mina Delavar ◽  
Bethrese Padini ◽  
Erik Vanstrum ◽  
Tessa Milman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document