scholarly journals COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT DENSITY TYPE FOAM ROLLERS ON KNEE RANGE OF MOTION AND PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLD: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 474-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott W. Cheatham ◽  
Kyle R. Stull
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Xavier de Araujo ◽  
Maurício Scholl Schell ◽  
Giovanni Esteves Ferreira ◽  
Mariana Della Valentina Pessoa ◽  
Luiza Raulino de Oliveira ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 673-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jari Ylinen ◽  
Esa-Pekka Takala ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Matti Nykänen ◽  
Arja Häkkinen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Albers ◽  
Anne Jäkel ◽  
Kai Wellmann ◽  
Ulrike von Hehn ◽  
Tobias Schmidt

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of osteopathic intervention (OI) and general osteopathic treatment (GOT) in individuals with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Methods: The trial was designed as a randomized controlled trial with 2 osteopathic interventions and 1 untreated control group. The patients in the two osteopathic groups received 10 osteopathic treatments (OI or GOT) within a time period of 12 weeks. The control group did not receive any osteopathic treatment. The primary outcome was the average pain intensity (API) assessed by visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were the pressure-pain threshold rated by means of a tender point score, and disease severity, assessed by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Results: 50 patients were randomized. The primary outcome parameter API decreased from 7.2 to 4.7 in the OI group, from 6.3 to 4.3 in the GOT group, and increased slightly in the control group from 6.2 to 6.6. There were significant differences for the change in API between the OI group and the control group (VAS: 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12-4.52), and between the GOT group and the control group (VAS: 2.4, 95% CI = 0.65-4.11), but no significant differences between the OI group and the GOT group. There were no significant differences for the secondary outcome parameters between the groups. Conclusion: A series of osteopathic treatments might be beneficial for patients suffering from FMS.


Pain ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (11) ◽  
pp. 2245-2255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra I. Baeumler ◽  
Johannes Fleckenstein ◽  
Franziska Benedikt ◽  
Julia Bader ◽  
Dominik Irnich

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Alexandre Nehring ◽  
Thiago Teixeira Serafim ◽  
Elisa Raulino Silva ◽  
Fábio Sprada de Menezes ◽  
Nicola Maffulli ◽  
...  

Context: Myofascial self-release is performed using a roller to exert pressure on the soft tissues and to promote effects similar to those of traditional massage. However, there is no standardization regarding its application, mainly in relation to time. Objective: To evaluate the effects of myofascial self-release with a rigid roller on range of motion (ROM), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and hamstring strength in asymptomatic individuals following 2 different times of intervention. Design: Randomized, controlled, blind, clinical trial comparing preintervention and immediately postintervention within 2 groups. Setting: Institutional physiotherapy clinic. Participants: A total of 40 university students (18–30 y), who had no symptoms, participated. Intervention: Foam roller for 30 seconds and 2 minutes for group 2. Main Outcome Measures: Hamstring PPT, knee-extension ROM, and peak knee-flexion torque measured before and immediately after the intervention. Results: Both groups experienced a statistically significant increase in ROM compared with baseline (30 s and 2 min for group 2 P < .024). There were no statistically significant differences comparing peak knee-flexion torque or PPT. Conclusions: Hamstring myofascial self-release using a roller for 30 seconds or 2 minutes produced an increase in ROM in healthy individuals. PPT and peak knee-flexion isometric torque showed no effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document