scholarly journals Actualization of effective stratified therapy in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (clinical trial)

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-77
Author(s):  
I.N. Samartsev ◽  
◽  
S.A. Zhivolupov ◽  
E.V. Jakovlev ◽  
◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen R. Bell ◽  
Jesse R. Fann ◽  
Jo Ann Brockway ◽  
Wesley R. Cole ◽  
Nigel E. Bush ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raoul Mansukhani ◽  
Antonio Belli ◽  
Amy Brenner ◽  
Rizwana Chaudhri ◽  
Lauren Frimley ◽  
...  

Background: Each year world-wide about 65 million people sustain a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Fatigue is a common and distressing symptom after mTBI. We examine the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) on fatigue in patients with mTBI using data from the CRASH-3 trial. Methods: The CRASH-3 trial randomised 9,202 patients with traumatic brain injury and no significant extracranial bleeding to receive TXA or placebo within 3 hours of injury. The primary outcome was death from head injury within 28 days of injury. The methods and results are presented elsewhere. Fatigue was recorded as “None”, “Moderate” or “Extreme.” This study examines the effect of TXA on extreme fatigue in the 2,632 patients with mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score≥13). Our analyses were not prespecified. Results: Our study primary outcome, extreme fatigue, was reported for 10 (0.8%) of 1,328 patients receiving TXA and 19 (1.5%) of 1,288 patients receiving placebo (risk ratio [RR]=0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-1.09). Death within 28 days of injury was reported for 34 (2.6%) of 1,328 patients receiving TXA versus 47 (3.6%) of 1,288 patients receiving placebo (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.45-1.08). Among patients allocated to TXA, 44 (3.3%) patients either died or reported extreme fatigue versus 66 (5.1%) patients among those allocated to placebo (RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.94). Conclusions: Early tranexamic acid treatment may reduce fatigue in mTBI patients, but these results need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Registration: ISRCTN (ISRCTN15088122, 19/07/2011), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01402882, 26/07/2011), EudraCT (2011-003669-14, 25/07/2011), Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR20121000441277, 30/10/2012).


2016 ◽  
Vol 181 (5S) ◽  
pp. 40-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Churchill ◽  
R. Scott Miller ◽  
Kayla Deru ◽  
Steffanie H. Wilson ◽  
Lindell K. Weaver

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1394-1401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia S. Robertson ◽  
James J. McCarthy ◽  
Emmy R. Miller ◽  
Harvey Levin ◽  
Stephen R. McCauley ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1363-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Brown ◽  
Katy O'Brien ◽  
Kelly Knollman-Porter ◽  
Tracey Wallace

Purpose The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently released guidelines for rehabilitation professionals regarding the care of children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Given that mTBI impacts millions of children each year and can be particularly detrimental to children in middle and high school age groups, access to universal recommendations for management of postinjury symptoms is ideal. Method This viewpoint article examines the CDC guidelines and applies these recommendations directly to speech-language pathology practices. In particular, education, assessment, treatment, team management, and ongoing monitoring are discussed. In addition, suggested timelines regarding implementation of services by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are provided. Specific focus is placed on adolescents (i.e., middle and high school–age children). Results SLPs are critical members of the rehabilitation team working with children with mTBI and should be involved in education, symptom monitoring, and assessment early in the recovery process. SLPs can also provide unique insight into the cognitive and linguistic challenges of these students and can serve to bridge the gap among rehabilitation and school-based professionals, the adolescent with brain injury, and their parents. Conclusion The guidelines provided by the CDC, along with evidence from the field of speech pathology, can guide SLPs to advocate for involvement in the care of adolescents with mTBI. More research is needed to enhance the evidence base for direct assessment and treatment with this population; however, SLPs can use their extensive knowledge and experience working with individuals with traumatic brain injury as a starting point for post-mTBI care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document