scholarly journals Preliminary Examination of a Proposed Treatment-Based Classification System for Patients Receiving Physical Therapy Interventions for Neck Pain

2007 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 513-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M Fritz ◽  
Gerard P Brennan
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Classification Methods ◽  
Therapy Interventions

Background and PurposeNeck pain frequently is managed by physical therapists. The development of classification methods for matching interventions to subgroups of patients may improve clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe a proposed classification system for patients with neck pain by examining data for consecutive patients receiving physical therapy interventions.Subjects and MethodsStandardized methods for collecting baseline and intervention data were used for all patients receiving physical therapy interventions for neck pain over 1 year. Outcome variables were the Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric pain rating, and number of visits. Treatment was provided at the discretion of the physical therapist. After the completion of treatment, each patient was classified by use of baseline variables. The interventions received by the patient were categorized as being matched or not matched to the classification. Outcomes for patients who received matched interventions were compared with those for patients who received nonmatched interventions. The interrater reliability of the classification algorithm was examined with a subset of 50 patients.ResultsA total of 274 patients were included in this study (74% women; age [X̄±SD]=44.4±16.0 years). The most common classification was centralization (34.7%); next were exercise and conditioning (32.8%) and mobility (17.5%). The interrater reliability for classification decisions was high (kappa=.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.87–1.0). A total of 113 patients (41.2%) received interventions matched to the classification. Receiving matched interventions was associated with greater improvements in the NDI (mean difference=5.6 points, 95% CI=2.6–8.6) and in pain ratings (mean difference=0.74 point, 95% CI=0.21–1.3) than receiving nonmatched interventions.Discussion and ConclusionThe development of classification methods for patients with neck pain may improve the outcomes of physical therapy intervention. This study was done to examine a previously proposed classification system for patients receiving physical therapy interventions for neck pain. Receiving interventions matched to the classification system was associated with better outcomes than receiving nonmatched interventions. Although the design of this study prohibited drawing conclusions about the effectiveness of the system, the results suggest that further research on the system may be warranted.

scholarly journals Does Continuing Education Improve Physical Therapists’ Effectiveness in Treating Neck Pain? A Randomized Clinical Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua A Cleland ◽  
Julie M Fritz ◽  
Gerard P Brennan ◽  
Jake Magel
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Continuing Education ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Educational Outreach ◽  
Final Visit ◽  
Pain Rating

Background and PurposePhysical therapists often attend continuing education (CE) courses to improve their overall clinical performance and patient outcomes. However, evidence suggests that CE courses may not improve the outcomes for patients receiving physical therapy for the management of neck pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an ongoing educational intervention for improving the outcomes for patients with neck pain.ParticipantsThe study participants were 19 physical therapists who attended a 2-day CE course focusing on the management of neck pain. All patients treated by the therapists in this study completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and a pain rating scale at the initial examination and at their final visit.MethodsTherapists from 11 clinics were invited to attend a 2-day CE course on the management of neck pain. After the CE course, the therapists were randomly assigned to receive either ongoing education consisting of small group sessions and an educational outreach session or no further education. Clinical outcomes achieved by therapists who received ongoing education and therapists who did not were compared for both pretraining and posttraining periods. The effects of receiving ongoing education were examined by use of linear mixed-model analyses with time period and group as fixed factors; improvements in disability and pain as dependent variables; and age, sex, and the patient's initial NDI and pain rating scores as covariates.ResultsPatients treated by therapists who received ongoing education experienced significantly greater reductions in disability during the study period (pretraining to posttraining) than those treated by therapists who did not receive ongoing training (mean difference=4.2 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.69, 7.7). Changes in pain did not differ for patients treated by the 2 groups of therapists during the study period (mean difference=0.47 point; 95% CI=−0.11, 1.0). Therapists in the ongoing education group also used fewer visits during the posttraining period (mean difference=1.5 visits; 95% CI=0.81, 2.3).Discussion and ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrated that ongoing education for the management of neck pain was beneficial in reducing disability for patients with neck pain while reducing the number of physical therapy visits. However, changes in pain did not differ for patients treated by the 2 groups of therapists. Although it appears that a typical CE course does not improve the overall outcomes for patients treated by therapists attending that course, more research is needed to evaluate other educational strategies to determine the most clinically effective and cost-effective interventions.

scholarly journals Interventions Used by Physical Therapists in Home Care for People After Hip Fracture

2008 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Kline Mangione ◽  
Rosalie B Lopopolo ◽  
Nancy P Neff ◽  
Rebecca L Craik ◽  
Kerstin M Palombaro
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Balance Training ◽  
Gait Training ◽  
Therapy Interventions

Background and PurposeThe majority of older people who survive a hip fracture have residual mobility disabilities. Any attempt to systematically reduce mobility disabilities after hip fracture, however, requires knowledge of the adequacy of current management practices. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to begin to understand the nature of physical therapy home care management by describing “usual care” for people after hip fracture.Subjects and MethodsIn 2003 and 2004, a national survey was conducted of all members of the American Physical Therapy Association who identified home care as their primary practice setting (n=3,130). “Usual care” was operationally defined as when more than 50% of respondents reported that they “always” or “often” use a specific intervention.ResultsSurvey questionnaires (1,029) were returned with a response rate of 32.9%. Functional training activities, including bed mobility, transfer and gait training, balance training, safety training, and patient education, were reported very frequently. Active-range-of-motion exercises were performed much more frequently than exercises involving added resistance.Discussion and ConclusionThis study provides a detailed description of the physical therapy interventions provided in the home care setting for patients after hip fracture. The sample size and national representation increase our confidence that this description accurately depicts physical therapist practice.

scholarly journals Management of Back and Neck Pain: Who Seeks Care From Physical Therapists?

2005 ◽  
Vol 85 (9) ◽  
pp. 872-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet K Freburger ◽  
Timothy S Carey ◽  
George M Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Illness Severity ◽  
Initial Evaluation ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Health And Illness ◽  
Spine Care ◽  
Therapy Services

Abstract Background and Purpose Little information is available on factors associated with physical therapist use by people with back or neck pain. Identifying the characteristics of people who seek care from physical therapists is a useful first step in determining whether there is appropriate use of physical therapy services. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with physical therapist use by people with back or neck pain. Subjects The subjects were 29,049 people who had back pain or neck pain, or both, and who were seen for an initial evaluation at 1 of 21 US spine care centers. Each subject and evaluating physician completed a written survey at the time of the initial evaluation. Methods Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with physical therapist use. Results Several measures of health and illness severity were associated with physical therapist use. Age and being male were negatively associated with physical therapist use. Education level, having workers' compensation coverage, and being in litigation were positively associated with physical therapist use. Physical therapist use also varied by previous physician use and census region. Discussion and Conclusion The results suggest that variations in physical therapist use are associated with factors other than health and illness severity. The results also suggest that people who would benefit from physical therapy may not be receiving it or that people who would not benefit from physical therapy are receiving it, or both.

scholarly journals Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Physical Therapy Functional Measurement Tool—the Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale—in Acute Hospital Inpatients

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara A. Kimmel ◽  
Jane E. Elliott ◽  
James M. Sayer ◽  
Anne E. Holland
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Functional Change ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Measurement Tool ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Hospital Inpatients

Background Functional outcome measurement tools exist for individual diagnoses (eg, stroke), but no prospectively validated mobility measure is available for physical therapists' use across the breadth of acute hospital inpatients. The modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (mILOA), a scale measuring assistance required to achieve functional tasks, has demonstrated functional change in inpatients with orthopedic conditions and trauma, although its psychometric properties are unknown. Objective The aim of this study was to assess interrater reliability, known-groups validity, and responsiveness of the mILOA in acute hospital inpatients. Design This was a cohort, measurement-focused study. Methods Patients at a large teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia, were recruited. One hundred fifty-two inpatients who were functionally stable across 5 clinical groups had an mILOA score calculated during 2 independent physical therapy sessions to assess interrater reliability. Known-groups validity (“ready for discharge”/“not ready for discharge”) and responsiveness also were assessed. Results The mean age of participants in the reliability phase of the study was 62.5 years (SD=17.7). The interrater reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,1]=.975; 95% confidence interval=.965, .982), with a mean difference between scores of −.270 and limits of agreement of ±5.64. The mILOA score displayed a mean difference between 2 known groups of 15.3 points. Responsiveness was demonstrated with a minimal detectable change of 5.8 points. Limitations Participants were included in the study if able to give consent for themselves, thereby limiting generalizability. Construct validity was not assessed due to the lack of a gold standard. Conclusions The mILOA has excellent interrater reliability and good known-groups validity and responsiveness to functional change across acute hospital inpatients with a variety of diagnoses. It may provide opportunities for physical therapists to collect a functional outcome measure to demonstrate the effectiveness of inpatient therapy and allow for benchmarking across institutions.

scholarly journals Role of Physical Therapists in Reducing Hospital Readmissions: Optimizing Outcomes for Older Adults During Care Transitions From Hospital to Community

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 1125-1134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Falvey ◽  
Robert E. Burke ◽  
Daniel Malone ◽  
Kyle J. Ridgeway ◽  
Beth M. McManus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Functional Decline ◽  
Care Transitions ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Therapy Interventions

AbstractHospital readmissions in older adult populations are an emerging quality indicator for acute care hospitals. Recent evidence has linked functional decline during and after hospitalization with an elevated risk of hospital readmission. However, models of care that have been developed to reduce hospital readmission rates do not adequately address functional deficits. Physical therapists, as experts in optimizing physical function, have a strong opportunity to contribute meaningfully to care transition models and demonstrate the value of physical therapy interventions in reducing readmissions. Thus, the purposes of this perspective article are: (1) to describe the need for physical therapist input during care transitions for older adults and (2) to outline strategies for expanding physical therapy participation in care transitions for older adults, with an overall goal of reducing avoidable 30-day hospital readmissions.

scholarly journals Patient Participation in Physical Therapy Goal Setting

2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 1118-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M Baker ◽  
Helen H Marshak ◽  
Gail T Rice ◽  
Grenith J Zimmerman
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Patient Participation ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Initial Examination ◽  
Goals And Objectives

Abstract Background and Purpose. An important part of treatment planning in physical therapy is effective goal setting. The Guide to Physical Therapist Practice recommends that therapists should identify the patient's goals and objectives during the initial examination in order to maximize outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine whether therapists seek to involve patients in goal setting and, if so, what methods they use. Therapists' attitudes toward participation and patient satisfaction with the examination were also examined. Subjects and Methods. Twenty-two physical therapists audiotaped the initial examination of 73 elderly patients (X̄=76.4 years of age, SD=7.1, range=65–94). The audiotaped examinations were then scored using the Participation Method Assessment Instrument (PMAI) to determine the frequency of attempts made by therapists to involve patients in goal setting. Therapists and patients completed surveys following the examinations. Results. Therapists' use of participation methods during examinations ranged from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 19 out of 21 possible items on the PMAI. The therapists stated that they believed that it is important to include patients in goal-setting activities and that outcomes will be improved if patients participate. Patients also indicated that participation is important to them. Discussion and Conclusion. In most cases, the therapists did not fully take advantage of the potential for patient participation in goal setting. Patient and therapist education is needed regarding methods for patient participation during initial goal-setting activities.

Contributions of Non-professional Local Physical Therapist In the Promotion of Community Health Activities in the Arsi Zone, Southeast Ethiopia (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leta Melaku
Keyword(s):  
Health Promotion ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Arsi Zone ◽  
Southeast Ethiopia ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND Physical activity is a first-line therapy and secures against persistent illnesses. Essential medical care professionals are obviously situated to advance actual action. Active recuperation mediations focused on advancement and upkeep of wellbeing, personal satisfaction, and wellness. There is, notwithstanding, a deficiency of such examination proof in Ethiopia. OBJECTIVE We planned to assess the degree of KAP of nonprofessional local physical therapists' towards wellbeing advancement in Arsi zone of Oromia, Southeast Ethiopia. METHODS Community based cross sectional study was conducted in April 2018 among 45 physical therapists. Data were collected using pre-tested, structured and self-administrative questionnaires. Participants were selected by quota sampling technique. The questionnaire was drafted specifically to test the KAP. Data were double entered and analyzed by SPSS Version 20.0 program. Descriptive statistics were used. The KAP were estimated using proportion. RESULTS In present response rate is 90.0%. Ages of respondents ranged between 24 – 87 years. 57.8% of participants got initial physical therapy knowledge from either of their parents. 53.3% of the respondents hear about health promotion from families and friends. 57.8% of them provided health promotion at their workplace. The overall percentage of all the respondents’ KAP in health promotion was 60.1%. CONCLUSIONS The respondents’ have good KAP towards health promotion. However there is still room for improvement. Also there is a lack of proper guide lines in determining the impact physical therapy.

Awareness and Perception of Physical Therapy Education, Role in Patient Management and Health Promotion Held by Senior Medical Practitioners

2020 ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
OJS Admin
Keyword(s):  
Health Promotion ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Patient Management ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Physical Therapy Education ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Medical Practitioners ◽  
Therapy Education

Physical therapists are integral part of health care system. In collaboration with other health providers, physical therapist can play an effective role in patient handling and well-being of individuals. The awareness and perception of senior medical practitioners is less known regarding physical therapy education, role in patient management and health promotion.

scholarly journals Value-Based Care for Musculoskeletal Pain: Are Physical Therapists Ready to Deliver?

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 621-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor A Lentz ◽  
Adam P Goode ◽  
Charles A Thigpen ◽  
Steven Z George
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Health Care Environment ◽  
Early Physical Therapy ◽  
Analytical Approaches

Abstract Early physical therapy models hold great promise for delivering high-value care for individuals with musculoskeletal pain. However, existing physical therapist practice and research standards are misaligned with value-based principles, which limits the potential for growth and sustainability of these models. This Perspective describes how the value proposition of early physical therapy can be improved by redefining harm, embracing a prognostic approach to clinical decision making, and advocating for system-wide guideline-adherent pain care. It also outlines the need to adopt a common language to describe these models and embrace new, rigorous study designs and analytical approaches to better understand where and how early physical therapy delivers value. The goal is to define a clear path forward to ensure physical therapists are aligned within health care systems to deliver on the American Physical Therapy Association’s vision of high-value care in a rapidly changing health care environment.

scholarly journals The Revised APTA Code of Ethics for the Physical Therapist and Standards of Ethical Conduct for the Physical Therapist Assistant: Theory, Purpose, Process, and Significance

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 803-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Lee Swisher ◽  
Peggy Hiller ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Codes Of Ethics ◽  
Ethical Conduct ◽  
Vision 2020 ◽  
Deliberative Process ◽  
Physical Therapist Assistant ◽  
Physical Therapist Assistants

IntroductionIn June 2009, the House of Delegates (HOD) of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) passed a major revision of the APTA Code of Ethics for physical therapists and the Standards of Ethical Conduct for the Physical Therapist Assistant. The revised documents will be effective July 1, 2010.PurposeThe purposes of this article are: (1) to provide a historical, professional, and theoretical context for this important revision; (2) to describe the 4-year revision process; (3) to examine major features of the documents; and (4) to discuss the significance of the revisions from the perspective of the maturation of physical therapy as a doctoring profession.Process of RevisionThe process for revision is delineated within the context of history and the Bylaws of APTA.Format, Structure, and Content of Revised Core Ethics DocumentsThe revised documents represent a significant change in format, level of detail, and scope of application. Previous APTA Codes of Ethics and Standards of Ethical Conduct for the Physical Therapist Assistant have delineated very broad general principles, with specific obligations spelled out in the Ethics and Judicial Committee's Guide for Professional Conduct and Guide for Conduct of the Physical Therapist Assistant. In contrast to the current documents, the revised documents address all 5 roles of the physical therapist, delineate ethical obligations in organizational and business contexts, and align with the tenets of Vision 2020.SignificanceThe significance of this revision is discussed within historical parameters, the implications for physical therapists and physical therapist assistants, the maturation of the profession, societal accountability and moral community, potential regulatory implications, and the inclusive and deliberative process of moral dialogue by which changes were developed, revised, and approved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document