Comparison of RANS Turbulence Models in Numerical Prediction of Chevron Nozzle Jet Flows

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantin Kurbatskii
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Numerical Prediction ◽  
Jet Flows ◽  
Rans Turbulence Models ◽  
Chevron Nozzle

Investigation of the Flow Structures in Supersonic Free and Impinging Jet Flows

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Chin ◽  
M. Li ◽  
C. Harkin ◽  
T. Rochwerger ◽  
L. Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Impinging Jet ◽  
Optical Methods ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Jet Flows ◽  
Shock Cell ◽  
Rans Turbulence Models

A numerical study of compressible jet flows is carried out using Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) turbulence models such as k-ɛ and k-ω-SST. An experimental investigation is performed concurrently using high-speed optical methods such as Schlieren photography and shadowgraphy. Numerical and experimental studies are carried out for the compressible impinging at various impinging angles and nozzle-to-wall distances. The results from both investigations converge remarkably well and agree with experimental data from the open literature. From the flow visualizations of the velocity fields, the RANS simulations accurately model the shock structures within the core jet region. The first shock cell is found to be constraint due to the interaction with the bow-shock structure for nozzle-to-wall distance less than 1.5 nozzle diameter. The results from the current study show that the RANS models utilized are suitable to simulate compressible free jets and impinging jet flows with varying impinging angles.

EVALUATING RANS TURBULENCE MODELS TO PREDICT THE AIRFLOW IN A DUCT BEND

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Batistella Lopes ◽  
Viviana Mariani ◽  
katia cordeiro ◽  
Claudine BEGHEIN
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Rans Turbulence Models

scholarly journals Prediction of Liner Metal Temperature of an Aeroengine Combustor with Multi-Physics Scale-Resolving CFD

Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 901
Author(s):  
Davide Bertini ◽  
Lorenzo Mazzei ◽  
Antonio Andreini
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Metal Temperature ◽  
Lean Burn ◽  
Turbulence Scale ◽  
Ansys Fluent ◽  
Multi Scale ◽  
Assessment Tests ◽  
Rans Turbulence Models

Computational Fluid Dynamics is a fundamental tool to simulate the flow field and the multi-physics nature of the phenomena involved in gas turbine combustors, supporting their design since the very preliminary phases. Standard steady state RANS turbulence models provide a reasonable prediction, despite some well-known limitations in reproducing the turbulent mixing in highly unsteady flows. Their affordable cost is ideal in the preliminary design steps, whereas, in the detailed phase of the design process, turbulence scale-resolving methods (such as LES or similar approaches) can be preferred to significantly improve the accuracy. Despite that, in dealing with multi-physics and multi-scale problems, as for Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT) in presence of radiation, transient approaches are not always affordable and appropriate numerical treatments are necessary to properly account for the huge range of characteristics scales in space and time that occur when turbulence is resolved and heat conduction is simulated contextually. The present work describes an innovative methodology to perform CHT simulations accounting for multi-physics and multi-scale problems. Such methodology, named U-THERM3D, is applied for the metal temperature prediction of an annular aeroengine lean burn combustor. The theoretical formulations of the tool are described, together with its numerical implementation in the commercial CFD code ANSYS Fluent. The proposed approach is based on a time de-synchronization of the involved time dependent physics permitting to significantly speed up the calculation with respect to fully coupled strategy, preserving at the same time the effect of unsteady heat transfer on the final time averaged predicted metal temperature. The results of some preliminary assessment tests of its consistency and accuracy are reported before showing its exploitation on the real combustor. The results are compared against steady-state calculations and experimental data obtained by full annular tests at real scale conditions. The work confirms the importance of high-fidelity CFD approaches for the aerothermal prediction of liner metal temperature.

scholarly journals Assessment of Numerical Methods for Plunging Breaking Wave Predictions

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 264
Author(s):  
Shanti Bhushan ◽  
Oumnia El Fajri ◽  
Graham Hubbard ◽  
Bradley Chambers ◽  
Christopher Kees
Keyword(s):  
Solitary Wave ◽  
Wave Breaking ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Wave Crest ◽  
Breaking Wave ◽  
Rans Turbulence Models ◽  
Run Up ◽  
Better Than

This study evaluates the capability of Navier–Stokes solvers in predicting forward and backward plunging breaking, including assessment of the effect of grid resolution, turbulence model, and VoF, CLSVoF interface models on predictions. For this purpose, 2D simulations are performed for four test cases: dam break, solitary wave run up on a slope, flow over a submerged bump, and solitary wave over a submerged rectangular obstacle. Plunging wave breaking involves high wave crest, plunger formation, and splash up, followed by second plunger, and chaotic water motions. Coarser grids reasonably predict the wave breaking features, but finer grids are required for accurate prediction of the splash up events. However, instabilities are triggered at the air–water interface (primarily for the air flow) on very fine grids, which induces surface peel-off or kinks and roll-up of the plunger tips. Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) turbulence models result in high eddy-viscosity in the air–water region which decays the fluid momentum and adversely affects the predictions. Both VoF and CLSVoF methods predict the large-scale plunging breaking characteristics well; however, they vary in the prediction of the finer details. The CLSVoF solver predicts the splash-up event and secondary plunger better than the VoF solver; however, the latter predicts the plunger shape better than the former for the solitary wave run-up on a slope case.

scholarly journals An integral validation technique of RANS turbulence models

2017 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 150-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Pond ◽  
Alireza Ebadi ◽  
Yves Dubief ◽  
Christopher M. White
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Rans Turbulence Models ◽  
Validation Technique

Temperature Corrected Turbulence Model for High Temperature Jet Flow

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 844-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled S. Abdol-Hamid ◽  
S. Paul Pao ◽  
Steven J. Massey ◽  
Alaa Elmiligui
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Mixing Layer ◽  
Supersonic Jet ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Jet Flows ◽  
Viscosity Term ◽  
Mixing Layer Flows

It is well known that the two-equation turbulence models under-predict mixing in the shear layer for high temperature jet flows. These turbulence models were developed and calibrated for room temperature, low Mach number, and plane mixing layer flows. In the present study, four existing modifications to the two-equation turbulence model are implemented in PAB3D and their effect is assessed for high temperature jet flows. In addition, a new temperature gradient correction to the eddy viscosity term is tested and calibrated. The new model was found to be in the best agreement with experimental data for subsonic and supersonic jet flows at both low and high temperatures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document