HSCT configuration design space exploration using aerodynamic response surface approximations

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuck Baker ◽  
Bernard Grossman ◽  
William Mason ◽  
Layne Watson ◽  
Raphael Haftka
Keyword(s):  
Response Surface ◽  
Design Space Exploration ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Space Exploration ◽  
Configuration Design ◽  
Response Surface Approximations

High-Speed Civil Transport Design Space Exploration Using Aerodynamic Response Surface Approximations

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuck A. Baker ◽  
Bernard Grossman ◽  
Raphael T. Haftka ◽  
William H. Mason ◽  
Layne T. Watson
Keyword(s):  
Response Surface ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Design Space Exploration ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Space Exploration ◽  
Response Surface Approximations

scholarly journals LIMITATIONS OF DESIGN SPACE-BASED INDICATORS FOR EARLY ROBUSTNESS ASSESSMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1977-1986
Author(s):  
Herle Bagh Juul-Nyholm ◽  
Nökkvi S. Sigurdarson ◽  
Martin Ebro ◽  
Tobias Eifler
Keyword(s):  
Robust Design ◽  
Design Space Exploration ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Space Exploration ◽  
Configuration Design ◽  
Main Thrust ◽  
Conflicting Objectives ◽  
Incremental Encoder ◽  
Point Level ◽  
Robustness Assessment

AbstractThis paper seeks to address the gap between qualitative Robust Design principles and parameter optimization. The former often fails to consider the challenging amount of details in embodiment and configuration design, while the latter is the widely accepted main thrust in traditional Robust Design. The gap is addressed by exploring the value of five quantitative robustness indicators for Design Space Exploration based on variables, objectives and constraints: The set level indicators, Design Space Size and Pareto Set Dispersion, and the point level indicators, Neighbourhood Performance, Failure Rate and Distance to Failure. As a background for the discussion of the limitations of these indicators an industrial case is presented. The case is an incremental encoder and includes two configurations for comparison, five objectives, eight variables, and a range of constraints. The design spaces are sampled and they show conflicting objectives, dispersed spaces and variables dependencies. Based on this it is suggested that set level indicators are more suitable than point level indicators of early robustness evaluation, but the available indicators are limited in their considerations of design space discontinuity and conflicts.

Design Space Exploration of a 512KB STT-Assisted SOT MRAM Cache

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian G. Caburnay ◽  
Jonathan Gabriel S.A. Reyes ◽  
Anastacia P. Ballesil-Alvarez ◽  
Maria Theresa G. de Leon ◽  
John Richard E. Hizon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Design Space Exploration ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Space Exploration
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document