Drag Reduction by Spanwise Wall Oscillation in Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows

AIAA Journal ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 842-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Il Choi ◽  
Chun-Xiao Xu ◽  
Hyung Jin Sung
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Wall Oscillation

Drag reduction by spanwise wall oscillation in wall-bounded turbulent flows

AIAA Journal ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 842-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-I. Choi ◽  
C.-X. Xu ◽  
H. J. Sung
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Wall Oscillation

Drag reduction capability of uniform blowing in supersonic wall-bounded turbulent flows

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukinori Kametani ◽  
Ayane Kotake ◽  
Koji Fukagata ◽  
Naoko Tokugawa
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Turbulent Flows

scholarly journals Non-sinusoidal wall oscillation for drag reduction

PAMM ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 565-566
Author(s):  
Andrea Cimarelli ◽  
Bettina Frohnapfel ◽  
Yosuke Hasegawa ◽  
Elisabetta De Angelis ◽  
Maurizio Quadrio
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Wall Oscillation ◽  
Sinusoidal Wall

scholarly journals Dynamics of viscoelastic pipe flow at low Reynolds numbers in the maximum drag reduction limit

2019 ◽  
Vol 874 ◽  
pp. 699-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose M. Lopez ◽  
George H. Choueiri ◽  
Björn Hof
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Pipe Flow ◽  
Domain Size ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Weissenberg Number ◽  
Pipe Length ◽  
Low Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Maximum Drag Reduction ◽  
Low Reynolds

Polymer additives can substantially reduce the drag of turbulent flows and the upper limit, the so-called state of ‘maximum drag reduction’ (MDR), is to a good approximation independent of the type of polymer and solvent used. Until recently, the consensus was that, in this limit, flows are in a marginal state where only a minimal level of turbulence activity persists. Observations in direct numerical simulations at low Reynolds numbers ($Re$) using minimal sized channels appeared to support this view and reported long ‘hibernation’ periods where turbulence is marginalized. In simulations of pipe flow at $Re$ near transition we find that, indeed, with increasing Weissenberg number ($Wi$), turbulence expresses long periods of hibernation if the domain size is small. However, with increasing pipe length, the temporal hibernation continuously alters to spatio-temporal intermittency and here the flow consists of turbulent puffs surrounded by laminar flow. Moreover, upon an increase in $Wi$, the flow fully relaminarizes, in agreement with recent experiments. At even larger $Wi$, a different instability is encountered causing a drag increase towards MDR. Our findings hence link earlier minimal flow unit simulations with recent experiments and confirm that the addition of polymers initially suppresses Newtonian turbulence and leads to a reverse transition. The MDR state on the other hand results at these low$Re$ from a separate instability and the underlying dynamics corresponds to the recently proposed state of elasto-inertial turbulence.

Influence of active control on STG-based generation of streamwise vortices in near-wall turbulence

2012 ◽  
Vol 710 ◽  
pp. 234-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.-Q. Deng ◽  
C.-X. Xu
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Active Control ◽  
Phase Control ◽  
Transient Growth ◽  
Vortex Generation ◽  
Streamwise Vortices ◽  
Detection Plane ◽  
Near Wall ◽  
Opposition Control

AbstractNear-wall streamwise vortices are closely related to the generation of high skin friction in wall-bounded turbulent flows. A common feature of controlled, friction-reduced turbulent flows is weakened near-wall streamwise vortices. In the present study, the streak transient growth (STG) mechanism for generating near-wall streamwise vortices by Schoppa & Hussain (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 453, 2002, pp. 57–108) is employed, and the opposition control proposed by Choi, Moin & Kim (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 262, 1994, pp. 75–110) is imposed during the transient growth process of perturbations to determine how active control affects the generation of quasi-streamwise vortices. In the transient growth stage, when the detection plane is located near the wall (${ y}_{d}^{+ } = 15$), the control can suppress the production of streamwise vorticity by weakening the near-wall vertical velocity; when the detection plane moves away from the wall (${ y}_{d}^{+ } = 28$), the control has the opposite effect. In the vortex generation stage, the control cannot change the dominance of the stretching effect. Controls imposed at different stages reveal the importance of the STG stage in vortex generation. Strengthened out-of-phase control and lessened in-phase control are proposed as an extension of the original opposition-control scheme. Application in a fully developed turbulent channel flow shows that strengthened ${ y}_{d}^{+ } = 10$ control can yield an even higher drag reduction rate than the original ${ y}_{d}^{+ } = 15$ control. Moreover, lessened ${ y}_{d}^{+ } = 28$ control can also achieve drag reduction and turbulence suppression.

Common features between the Newtonian laminar–turbulent transition and the viscoelastic drag-reducing turbulence

2019 ◽  
Vol 877 ◽  
pp. 405-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anselmo S. Pereira ◽  
Roney L. Thompson ◽  
Gilmar Mompean
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Homoclinic Orbits ◽  
Theoretical Development ◽  
Transitional Flows ◽  
Turbulent Transition ◽  
Laminar Turbulent Transition

The transition from laminar to turbulent flows has challenged the scientific community since the seminal work of Reynolds (Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, vol. 174, 1883, pp. 935–982). Recently, experimental and numerical investigations on this matter have demonstrated that the spatio-temporal dynamics that are associated with transitional flows belong to the directed percolation class. In the present work, we explore the analysis of laminar–turbulent transition from the perspective of the recent theoretical development that concerns viscoelastic turbulence, i.e. the drag-reducing turbulent flow obtained from adding polymers to a Newtonian fluid. We found remarkable fingerprints of the variety of states that are present in both types of flows, as captured by a series of features that are known to be present in drag-reducing viscoelastic turbulence. In particular, when compared to a Newtonian fully turbulent flow, the universal nature of these flows includes: (i) the statistical dynamics of the alternation between active and hibernating turbulence; (ii) the weakening of elliptical and hyperbolic structures; (iii) the existence of high and low drag reduction regimes with the same boundary; (iv) the relative enhancement of the streamwise-normal stress; and (v) the slope of the energy spectrum decay with respect to the wavenumber. The maximum drag reduction profile was attained in a Newtonian flow with a Reynolds number near the boundary of the laminar regime and in a hibernating state. It is generally conjectured that, as the Reynolds number increases, the dynamics of the intermittency that characterises transitional flows migrate from a situation where heteroclinic connections between the upper and the lower branches of solutions are more frequent to another where homoclinic orbits around the upper solution become the general rule.

Drag Reduction in Synthetic Seawater by Flexible and Rigid Polymer Addition Into a Rotating Cylindrical Double Gap Device

2015 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafhael M. Andrade ◽  
Anselmo S. Pereira ◽  
Edson J. Soares
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Salt Concentration ◽  
Polymer Concentration ◽  
Transient Behavior ◽  
Turbulent Structures ◽  
Polymer Addition ◽  
Rigid Polymer ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Poly Ethylene

Flexible and rigid long chain polymers in very dilute solutions can significantly reduce the drag in turbulent flows. The polymers successively stretch and coil by interacting with the turbulent structures, which changes the turbulent flow and further imposes a transient behavior on the drag reduction (DR) as well as a subsequent mechanical polymer degradation. This time-dependent phenomenon is strongly affected by a number of parameters, which are analyzed here, such as the Reynolds number, polymer concentration, polymer molecular weight, and salt concentration. This last parameter can dramatically modify the polymeric structure. The investigation of the salt concentration's impact on the DR is mostly motivated by some potential applications of this technique to ocean transport and saline fluid flows. In the present paper, a cylindrical double gap rheometer device is used to study the effects of salt concentration on DR over time. The reduction of drag is induced by three polymers: poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO), polyacrylamide (PAM), and xanthan gum (XG). These polymers are dissolved in deionized water both in the presence of salt and in its absence. The DR is displayed from the very start of the test to the time when the DR achieves its final level of efficiency, following the mechanical degradations. The presence of salt in PEO and XG solutions reduces the maximum DR, DRmax, as well as the time to achieve it. In contrast, the DR does not significantly change over the time for PAM solutions upon the addition of salt.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document